Original Paper
Abstract
Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate state between normal aging and dementia, characterized by subjective cognitive decline and objective memory impairment. Cognitive training has consistently shown short-term benefits for individuals with MCI, but evidence on the long-term effectiveness is extremely limited. Given the progressive nature of MCI and the need for sustainable strategies to delay cognitive decline, research on the long-term impact of cognitive training is necessary and timely. Mobile-based platforms offer a promising solution by enhancing accessibility and adherence, but their durability of effect over extended periods remains underexplored.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of a mobile-based cognitive training app on the cognitive function of older adults with MCI.
Methods: In total, 28 older adults with MCI used Cogthera, a mobile cognitive training app based on metamemory training. Participants completed 2 training sessions daily for 3 months, and 9 (32%) continued for an additional 12 months. Cognitive function and quality of life were assessed using the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 14 and EQ-5D-5L.
Results: Cognitive function improved over 15 months, as measured by Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (F2,35.56=7.08; P=.003). EQ-5D-5L scores increased at 3 months but did not show sustained change at 15 months (F2,42.14=3.40; P=.04). Greater cognitive improvements were associated with younger age, higher functional status, and lower baseline cognitive function.
Conclusions: This study showed that long-term use of a mobile-based metamemory cognitive training app was associated with cognitive improvements over 15 months. Although limited by the small sample size and the absence of a control group, these findings suggest potential for mobile cognitive training as a sustainable intervention that warrants validation in larger trials.
doi:10.2196/81648
Keywords
Introduction
Background
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate stage between normal aging and Alzheimer disease (AD). It has emerged as a key target for early intervention to delay AD. MCI is characterized by subjective cognitive decline along with objective memory impairment without functional impairment []. The prevalence of MCI is 6.7% among individuals aged between 60 and 64 years and 25.5% among those aged between 80 and 84 years []. In addition, approximately 10% of individuals with MCI progress to AD annually [].
Nonpharmacological interventions, such as physical activity, social engagement, and cognitive training, are widely recommended to delay AD onset in MCI [-]. Cognitive training has demonstrated superior efficacy in improving cognitive function in short-term treatment [-]. Despite these short-term benefits, few studies have examined whether cognitive training produces sustained effects beyond 1 year because of methodological difficulties []. Traditional cognitive interventions also rely on in-person, paper-based sessions, which can limit accessibility and adherence []. Digital cognitive training based on a mobile app enables home-based, self-paced engagement and has demonstrated greater participation [].
We have previously reported the short-term efficacy of metamemory training (MMT) [,]. Metamemory refers to an individual’s awareness and understanding of their memory functions, including their contents and processes [,]. MMT is based on this concept and has been shown to be effective in teaching mnemonic strategies and improving cognitive function [-]. However, its long-term efficacy may need to be investigated, especially with a mobile cognitive training app.
Objectives
This study aimed to examine the long-term effects of a cognitive training app based on MMT in older adults with MCI. We hypothesized that prolonged use of the app would lead to sustained improvements in cognitive function.
Methods
Participants
Participants were recruited from 1 memory clinic. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) aged between 55 and 85 years; (2) diagnosed with MCI by trained psychiatrists or neurologists according to the criteria proposed by Petersen []; (3) ownership of a personal smartphone and no difficulties using mobile apps; (4) if taking cognitive enhancers (acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or memantine), a stable dose maintained for at least 12 weeks before randomization; (5) availability of a caregiver who spends more than 8 hours per week with the participant and agrees to assist with follow-up and clinical evaluations; (6) ability to independently make phone calls to a caregiver using a smartphone; (7) no difficulties with reading or writing in Korean; and (8) adequate vision and hearing to participate in the clinical trial. MCI diagnosis was based on the following criteria by Petersen []: (1) reported concerns regarding cognitive changes, (2) impairment in 1 or more cognitive domains, (3) preservation of independence in functional abilities, and (4) absence of dementia []. Participants underwent cognitive assessments conducted by clinical psychologists using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CERAD-NP). Eligibility criteria required a global CDR score of 0.5 and performance at least 1.0 SD below the mean in 1 or more memory domains of the CERAD-NP.
Exclusion criteria included the presence of serious physical illness or psychiatric disorders that could interfere with study procedures; the use of medications known to affect cognitive function (except those taken consistently for at least 3 months); and any neurological or medical conditions associated with cognitive decline other than MCI, such as stroke, central nervous system infection, head trauma, alcohol dependence, or depression. Of the 40 participants screened, 10 (25%) were excluded, 1 (3%) dropped out, and 1 (3%) experienced a stroke. Data from 28 (70%) participants were analyzed.
Ethical Considerations
This study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (20-2022-48). All participants provided informed consent before participation. All collected data were deidentified and stored securely, and no personally identifiable information was accessible to the research team. Participants received KRW 200,000 (US $136) as compensation for their participation.
Intervention
Participants underwent cognitive training using Cogthera, a smartphone-based app based on MMT developed by Youn et al []. The structure and content of the Cogthera intervention, including its implementation of metamemory-based strategies, have been previously described in detail. The program was designed to enhance key cognitive functions, including attention, imagery, and association, which support effective memory encoding and retrieval. Attention training helped participants focus and concentrate on target information to facilitate deeper encoding. Imagery training encouraged vivid visualization to reinforce memory consolidation and retrieval. Association training promoted the integration of new information into existing semantic memory networks. Throughout the training process, Cogthera provides personalized feedback and dynamically adjusts task difficulty, enabling users to observe and evaluate their cognitive processes independently.
A 15-month single-arm longitudinal study was conducted to investigate the long-term efficacy of mobile-based cognitive training. Participants completed a 3-month cognitive training program using Cogthera, with 9 (32%) of the 28 participants continuing an additional 12 months. The training program consisted of 2 daily sessions, 7 days per week, with each session lasting approximately 15 minutes. The first session comprised 3 core cognitive exercises targeting attention, imagery, and association. The second session included 4 additional exercises, selected from 9 available options, excluding those already used in the first session. A personalized algorithm determined daily exercise composition to optimize engagement. All participants were able to use the Cogthera program independently without external assistance. The detailed content of each exercise can be found in .
Measures
Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 14
The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 14 (ADAS-Cog 14) was used to assess the severity of cognitive dysfunction []. This measure consists of fourteen tasks: (1) word recall, (2) commands, (3) constructional praxis, (4) delayed word recall, (5) naming, (6) ideational praxis, (7) orientation, (8) word recognition, (9) maze, (10) number cancelation, (11) remembering instructions, (12) comprehension, (13) word finding difficulty, and (14) spoken language ability. The ADAS-Cog 14 subdomains were categorized into 3 cognitive domains: memory, language, and praxis []. The total ADAS-Cog 14 score ranges from 0 to 90 points, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment, as the score reflects the number of errors made across tasks.
CERAD-NP Assessment
The CERAD-NP was administered to assess cognitive function [,]. This battery included the following neuropsychological tests: (1) verbal fluency, (2) Boston Naming Test, (3) Mini-Mental State Examination, (4) word list learning, (5) constructional praxis, (6) word list recall, (7) word list recognition, (8) constructional praxis recall, (9) Trail Making Test, and (10) Stroop test. The CERAD-NP total score was calculated as the sum of raw scores, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
CDR Scale
The CDR scale was used to stage dementia severity []. This scale is informed by semistructured interviews conducted with both participants and informants, covering 6 domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem-solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Each domain is scored from 0 to 3, with the scores used in calculating the global CDR score and the CDR-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). The global CDR score is an ordinal scale ranked from 0 to 3 as follows: 0=no cognitive impairment, 0.5=questionable or MCI, 1=mild dementia, 2=moderate dementia, 3=severe dementia. The CDR-SB is a continuous measure ranging from 0 to 18, calculated by summing the individual domain scores. Higher scores on both the global CDR and CDR-SB indicate greater cognitive and functional impairment.
EQ-5D-5L Scale
The EQ-5D-5L was administered to evaluate health-related quality of life []. This measure consists of five dimensions: (1) mobility, (2) self-care, (3) usual activities, (4) pain and discomfort, and (5) anxiety and depression. Each dimension is rated on a 5-level scale, with response options ranging from no problem to extreme problem. Responses were converted into a single index score using a national-specific value set []. This value set, derived from stated preference data collected from the general population, assigns weights to each health dimension level. The index score ranges from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better overall health status. In contrast, a lower score on each subdimension reflects a higher level of health in that specific domain.
Data Collection
Participants who provided informed consent were screened using global CDR and CERAD-NP. During the initial visit, participants underwent cognitive function assessments using ADAS-Cog 14 and completed self-reported questionnaires, such as EQ-5D-5L. After completing these assessments, they were provided with a smartphone preinstalled with Cogthera. Follow-up data on ADAS-Cog 14 and EQ-5D-5L were collected after 3 months of using Cogthera. In addition, further assessments were conducted on 9 (32%) of the 28 participants who continued using Cogthera for 15 months. Training adherence was assessed using compliance, which was defined as the proportion of completed sessions relative to the total number of assigned sessions. The assigned frequency was 2 sessions per day, and compliance was calculated separately for the initial 3-month period and the 12-month extension.
Statistical Analysis
Linear mixed model analyses were performed to assess changes in ADAS-Cog 14 and EQ-5D-5L scores over time while accounting for both intraindividual and interindividual variations in longitudinal data. The models included time (baseline, 3 mo, and 15 mo) as a fixed factor and participant as a random effect, allowing individual variability in intercepts. To evaluate the overall effect of time, type Ⅲ ANOVA was conducted.
To identify explanatory variables predicting intervention effects, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used. This approach was used to identify the most relevant predictors while minimizing overfitting []. The outcome variable was the change in ADAS-Cog 14 at follow-up, with LASSO models including age, sex, education, CDR-SB, baseline ADAS-Cog 14 scores, and baseline EQ-5D-5L scores as predictors. All variables were standardized by centering each variable around the mean and scaling by the SD. The regularization parameter, λ, was optimized using 9-fold cross-validation to balance model complexity and predictive performance. The optimal λ value was then applied to estimate the coefficients of the selected predictors.
To contextualize cognitive changes observed in this study, descriptive data from the placebo cohort of EXPEDITION studies were used as a historical reference [,]. EXPEDITION and EXPEDITION-2 were multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 trials of solanezumab, including 663 patients with MCI treated with a placebo. Cognitive function was assessed using ADAS-Cog 14 at baseline and at 6 follow-up points every 3 months over 18 months. Welch t test (2-tailed) was conducted to compare data from this study with the EXPEDITION placebo cohort at baseline, 3 months, and 15 months, accounting for unequal variances and sample sizes.
All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.4.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Statistical significance was set at P<.05, with all tests being 2-tailed. For the post hoc analysis of the linear mixed model, Bonferroni-adjusted P values were reported. Effect sizes for the fixed time effects were also reported, with partial eta-squared (η2p) computed from the corresponding F statistics. Missing data were addressed through complete case analysis without imputation. To ensure analytic independence, all data access, monitoring, and statistical analyses were conducted exclusively by authors not affiliated with the company. Company-affiliated authors had no access to raw data and did not participate in data cleaning, analytic decisions, or interpretation of results.
Results
Demographic Characteristics
A total of 28 participants were included in the analysis (). The mean age of participants was 72.8 (SD 6.7) years, and the mean education level was 11.4 (SD 5.0) years. The sample comprised a higher proportion of female individuals (20/28, 71%) and was predominantly composed of nondrinkers (27/28, 96%) and nonsmokers (26/28, 93%). The mean CDR-SB score was 2.0 (SD 1.1), ranging from 0.5 to 4.0.
| Demographic characteristic | Values | |
| Age (y), mean (SD) | 72.8 (6.7) | |
| Sex, n (%) | ||
| Female | 20 (71) | |
| Male | 8 (29) | |
| Education (y), mean (SD) | 11.4 (5.0) | |
| Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (z scorea), mean (SD) | ||
| Word list learning | –0.5 (0.9) | |
| Word list recall | –1.6 (1.0) | |
| Word list recognition | –1.7 (1.4) | |
| Constructional praxis recall | –1.3 (0.9) | |
| Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (score), mean (SD) | 2.0 (1.1) | |
aA standardized score indicating how many SDs a value is from the mean.
Training Adherence
During the initial 3-month training period, participants completed an average of 85.3% (SD 23.6%) of assigned sessions. Among 9 (32%) of the 28 participants who continued for an additional 12 months, mean compliance during the extension period was 51.7% (SD 25.1%).
Intervention Effects of Cogthera
Linear mixed model analysis revealed a significant decrease in total ADAS-Cog 14 scores over time, indicating improved cognitive function (F2,35.56=7.08; P=.003; η2p=0.28; ). Specifically, a significant decrease in total ADAS-Cog 14 scores was observed over 15 months (Bonferroni-adjusted P=.001), while the change over 3 months was not significant (Bonferroni-adjusted P=.27; ).
| Baseline (n=28), mean (SD) | 3 mo (n=28), mean (SD) | 15 mo (n=9), mean (SD) | F test (df) | P value | ||
| Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscalea | ||||||
| Total score | 28.18 (8.21) | 27.07 (7.73) | 25.56 (8.28) | 7.08 (2, 35.56) | .003 | |
| Memoryb | 22.25 (6.24) | 21.86 (6.29) | 20.44 (8.56) | 2.53 (2, 35.83) | .09 | |
| Languagec | 0.86 (0.93) | 0.64 (0.83) | 0.56 (0.73) | 1.64 (2, 35.83) | .21 | |
| Praxisd | 2.32 (1.19) | 1.96 (1.10) | 1.33 (1.00) | 7.11 (2, 39.33) | .002 | |
| EQ-5D-5L | ||||||
| Index score | 0.81 (0.08) | 0.85 (0.04) | 0.84 (0.07) | 3.40 (2, 42.14) | .04 | |
aLower scores represent better performance.
bSum of word recall, delayed word recall, orientation, and word recognition task scores.
cSum of naming, remembering instructions, comprehension, word finding difficulty, and spoken language ability task scores.
dSum of commands, constructional praxis, and ideational praxis task scores.
| Estimate (SE) | t test (df) | P valuea | ||||||
| Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale | ||||||||
| Total score | ||||||||
| 3 months vs baseline | –1.11 (0.72) | –1.53 (35.06) | .27 | |||||
| 15 months vs baseline | –4.33 (1.16) | –3.74 (35.96) | .001 | |||||
| Memory | ||||||||
| 3 months vs baseline | –0.39 (0.68) | –0.58 (35.17) | .99 | |||||
| 15 months vs baseline | –2.42 (1.08) | –2.25 (36.38) | .06 | |||||
| Language | ||||||||
| 3 months vs baseline | –0.21 (0.12) | –1.81 (34.65) | .16 | |||||
| 15 months vs baseline | –0.09 (0.19) | –0.47 (36.83) | .99 | |||||
| Praxis | ||||||||
| 3 months vs baseline | –0.36 (0.23) | –1.53 (35.78) | .27 | |||||
| 15 months vs baseline | –1.35 (0.36) | –3.76 (42.63) | .001 | |||||
| EQ-5D-5L | ||||||||
| Index score | ||||||||
| 3 months vs baseline | 0.04 (0.02) | 2.58 (35.29) | .03 | |||||
| 15 months vs baseline | 0.03 (0.02) | 1.27 (49.19) | .42 | |||||
aBonferroni-adjusted P values.
In the ADAS-Cog 14 subdomain analysis, praxis scores, representing executive function, showed a significant decline over time (F2,39.33=7.11; P=.002; η2p=0.27), particularly over 15 months (Bonferroni-adjusted P=.001). The reduction in memory scores was marginal (F2,35.83=2.53; P=.09; η2p=0.12), with a trend-level decrease observed at 15 months (Bonferroni-adjusted P=.06). The overall effect of time on language scores was not significant.
A significant change in the EQ-5D-5L index score was observed over time (F2,42.14=3.40; P=.04; η2p=0.14), with a statistically significant increase from baseline to 3 months (Bonferroni-adjusted P=.03). Among the EQ-5D-5L subdimensions, mobility showed a marginal overall effect of time (F2, 39.05=2.59; P=.09; η2p=0.12), with a trend-level decrease observed at 3 months (Bonferroni-adjusted P=.06). Detailed results for the EQ-5D-5L subdimensions are provided in Tables S1 and S2 in ).
Factors Associated With Intervention Effects on Cognitive Function
According to the LASSO results, CDR-SB and baseline ADAS-Cog 14 scores predicted score changes over 3 months, while age, CDR-SB, and baseline ADAS-Cog 14 scores predicted score changes over 15 months. The multiple linear regression model, which included sex, CDR-SB, and baseline ADAS-Cog 14 scores, explained a significant proportion of the variance in score changes over 3 months (R2=0.40; adjusted R2=0.33; P=.01; ). Specifically, lower CDR-SB scores (β=–0.51; P=.02), and higher baseline ADAS-Cog 14 scores significantly predicted greater improvements (β=0.61; P=.01).
| Values, estimate (SE) | β | t test (df) | R2 (adjusted R2) | P value | ||||
| Change over 3 monthsa | 0.40 (0.33) | .01 | ||||||
| Sex | 2.60 (1.32) | 0.69 | 1.97 | .06 | ||||
| CDR-SBb | –1.78 (0.70) | –0.51 | –2.53 | .02 | ||||
| ADAS-Cog 14c | 0.28 (0.09) | 0.61 | 3.01 | .01 | ||||
| Change over 15 monthsd | 0.81 (0.70) | .03 | ||||||
| Age | –0.44 (0.14) | –0.62 | –3.23 | .02 | ||||
| CDR-SB | –4.80 (1.39) | –1.10 | –3.47 | .02 | ||||
| ADAS-Cog 14 | 0.61 (0.14) | 1.05 | 4.25 | .01 | ||||
aScore obtained by subtracting the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale score at 3 months from the baseline Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale score.
bCDR-SB: Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes.
cADAS-Cog 14: Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale.
dScore obtained by subtracting the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale score at 15 months from the baseline Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale score.
The regression model, which included age, CDR-SB, and baseline ADAS-Cog 14 scores, accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in score changes observed over 15 months (R2=0.81; adjusted R2=0.70; P=.03). Specifically, younger age (β=–0.62; P=.02), lower CDR-SB scores (β=–1.10; P=.02), and higher baseline ADAS-Cog 14 scores significantly predicted greater improvements (β=1.05; P=.01).
Comparison With Historical Placebo Data
The mean and SD data from a previously reported placebo cohort were used for comparison at each time point. No significant differences were observed between the Cogthera group and the placebo group at baseline (t29.68=0.89; P=.38; ). At 3 months, ADAS-Cog 14 scores in the Cogthera group were marginally lower than those in the placebo group (t30.63=1.81; P=.08). By 15 months, the difference became statistically significant, suggesting greater cognitive improvement in the Cogthera group (t8.55=3.01; P=.02).

Discussion
Principal Findings
This study examined the long-term effects of a mobile-based cognitive training app in older adults with MCI. ADAS-Cog 14 scores decreased over time, and EQ-5D-5L scores increased in the early phase of training. Age, CDR-SB, and baseline ADAS-Cog 14 scores were associated with the degree of cognitive change. Although comparisons with a historical placebo cohort are limited by differences in design and sample characteristics, the observed reduction in ADAS-Cog 14 scores over 15 months suggests a pattern of cognitive change associated with long-term training use.
The primary finding of this study is the reduction in ADAS-Cog 14 total, memory, and praxis scores associated with long-term use of Cogthera. While no meaningful change was observed at 3 months, a clearer reduction emerged at 15 months. This delayed pattern may reflect the cumulative effects of training, but it could also be influenced by practice effects, familiarity with test procedures, or natural fluctuations in cognitive performance. These possibilities underscore the need for cautious interpretation, particularly in the absence of a control group. Even so, the overall pattern is consistent with previous studies, suggesting that longer training durations are more likely to yield detectable cognitive improvements []. Unlike other ADAS-Cog 14 subdomains, language scores did not show meaningful change. The small numerical variation observed is likely to reflect measurement variability or stabilization rather than the true effect of the intervention. This aligns with previous research indicating that language tends to remain relatively preserved in the early stage of cognitive decline compared with other ADAS-Cog 14 subdomains [,].
Another finding is a rise in the EQ-5D-5L index score during the first 3 months of training. This early change is consistent with previous studies reporting short-term benefits in quality of life among individuals with MCI, but the effect did not persist at 15 months in this study [-]. This pattern suggests that changes in perceived well-being may be limited to the initial phase of training. Such early gains may also reflect nonspecific factors, including placebo effects or heightened engagement at the beginning of training.
Predictor analyses revealed that both short- and long-term improvements in cognitive function were associated with lower baseline cognitive function and higher functional status. Participants with higher baseline ADAS-Cog 14 scores, which indicate poorer initial cognitive performance, and those with lower CDR-SB scores, which indicate less functional impairment, tended to show larger reductions over time. Previous research has reported conflicting findings regarding the relationship between baseline cognitive performance and cognitive training effectiveness []. Two competing hypotheses have been proposed to explain this relationship: the compensation effect and the magnification effect. The compensation effect suggests that individuals with higher baseline cognitive performance benefit less from training due to limited room for improvement. In contrast, the magnification effect proposes that they benefit more by leveraging greater cognitive efficiency and plasticity. The findings of this study align with the compensation effect, as participants with lower baseline cognitive performance showed greater training-related gains. This pattern suggests that Cogthera may have provided compensatory cognitive stimulation. Such stimulation could have helped individuals with lower baseline cognitive performance make better use of their remaining cognitive resources. CDR-SB reflects the pathological progression of cognitive and functional decline and reliably differentiates MCI from very early AD while predicting future progression [-]. The association between lower CDR-SB scores and greater cognitive gains may suggest that individuals with preserved daily function but greater cognitive vulnerability were more responsive to training. These observations are broadly consistent with compensatory mechanisms, while other explanations remain possible.
Younger age was associated with modestly better cognitive outcomes over the 15-month period. One possible explanation is that younger participants may engage more consistently in long-term digital interventions. Previous research has shown that they tend to complete more training sessions and demonstrate higher adherence. Such patterns of adherence may help account for the cognitive changes observed in this group [-].
These findings suggest that MMT delivered through a mobile app may offer a scalable and accessible approach for individuals with MCI. Mobile apps provide a practical alternative to traditional cognitive training by allowing users to engage in cognitive exercises at their convenience. As memory decline has already begun in individuals with MCI, this approach may serve as a supportive digital complement to existing strategies. A potential strength of this study is the observation that cognitive changes became more evident with prolonged use, which may help inform future work on long-term digital training. Given the lack of known adverse effects, mobile-based cognitive training could represent a feasible and well-tolerated adjunctive approach for older adults with MCI. It may be particularly useful in cases where pharmacological treatments carry a higher risk of side effects.
Limitations
Despite the observational insights provided by this study, several limitations warrant careful consideration. First, the absence of a control group limits internal validity, as it is not possible to distinguish training-related changes from those that may occur naturally over time. Without contemporaneous controls, causal inferences cannot be drawn.
Second, although 28 participants initiated the study, only 9 (32%) continued to the 15-month assessment. Because long-term participation was voluntary, those who remained may differ in motivation or engagement. However, baseline comparisons between participants who continued to 15 months and those who participated only in the initial 3-month period showed no significant differences in demographic characteristics, cognitive measures, quality of life scores, or training adherence, as presented in Table S3 in . In addition, baseline-to–3-month change scores did not differ between the 2 groups, indicating that early improvement was not greater among those who remained in the study. These findings suggest that systematic baseline differences were limited, although unmeasured factors related to motivation or persistence may still have influenced long-term retention. The small number of long-term participants also restricts the generalizability of the 15-month findings.
Finally, the overall sample size was small, constraining statistical power and limiting the ability to detect subtle effects. Future studies with larger, randomized, and more diverse samples will be essential to determine whether long-term mobile-based cognitive training produces reliable and sustained effects in individuals with MCI.
Conclusions
This study suggests that a mobile-based MMT app may offer supportive benefits for cognitive function in older adults with MCI. Although methodological limitations constrain definitive interpretation, the observed patterns indicate that mobile-based cognitive training could be a feasible and accessible approach for individuals seeking strategies to maintain cognitive health. Continued evaluation in larger, controlled studies will help determine the extent and durability of these potential effects.
Funding
This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program—the bioindustry technology development; grant 20018143, development and clinical application of digital therapeutic devices user experience, untact clinical cloud platforms, and real-world evidence technologies based on the brain and body of the elderly) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (South Korea).
Data Availability
The datasets generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
YB is employed by Emocog Inc. SK was employed in the R&D department of Emocog Inc. during the conduct of the study and remained employed until August 31, 2025. JYL is the chief executive officer of Emocog Inc. LS is the chief operating officer of Cogthera GmbH, a subsidiary of Emocog Inc. Emocog Inc owns the app evaluated in this study and has a commercial interest in its future distribution. Cogthera GmbH is responsible for the commercialization and planned distribution of a modified version of this app in Germany. However, YB, SK, JYL, and LS were not involved in the data collection or analysis, which was conducted independently by other authors. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Description of the cognitive exercises included in Cogthera.
XLSX File (Microsoft Excel File), 11 KBSupplementary EQ-5D-5L subdimension results and baseline user comparisons.
DOCX File , 29 KBReferences
- Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. Mar 01, 1999;56(3):303-308. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Petersen RC, Lopez O, Armstrong MJ, Getchius TS, Ganguli M, Gloss D, et al. Practice guideline update summary: mild cognitive impairment [RETIRED]: report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. Jan 16, 2018;90(3):126-135. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Mitchell AJ, Shiri-Feshki M. Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia--meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. Apr 03, 2009;119(4):252-265. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Baker LD, Frank LL, Foster-Schubert K, Green PS, Wilkinson CW, McTiernan A, et al. Effects of aerobic exercise on mild cognitive impairment: a controlled trial. Arch Neurol. Jan 01, 2010;67(1):71-79. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Suzuki T, Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Tsutsumimoto K, et al. Effects of multicomponent exercise on cognitive function in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. Oct 31, 2012;12:128. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Li H, Li J, Li N, Li B, Wang P, Zhou T. Cognitive intervention for persons with mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. Apr 2011;10(2):285-296. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Hughes TF, Flatt JD, Fu B, Chang CC, Ganguli M. Engagement in social activities and progression from mild to severe cognitive impairment: the MYHAT study. Int Psychogeriatr. Apr 2013;25(4):587-595. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Gavelin HM, Dong C, Minkov R, Bahar-Fuchs A, Ellis KA, Lautenschlager NT, et al. Combined physical and cognitive training for older adults with and without cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ageing Res Rev. Mar 2021;66:101232. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Intzandt B, Vrinceanu T, Huck J, Vincent T, Montero-Odasso M, Gauthier CJ, et al. Comparing the effect of cognitive vs. exercise training on brain MRI outcomes in healthy older adults: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. Sep 2021;128:511-533. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Raimo S, Cropano M, Gaita M, Maggi G, Cavallo ND, Roldan-Tapia MD, et al. The efficacy of cognitive training on neuropsychological outcomes in mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis. Brain Sci. Oct 25, 2023;13(11):1510. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Hampstead BM, Stringer AY, Iordan AD, Ploutz-Snyder R, Sathian K. Toward rational use of cognitive training in those with mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. Mar 06, 2023;19(3):933-945. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Belleville S, Cuesta M, Bier N, Brodeur C, Gauthier S, Gilbert B, et al. Five-year effects of cognitive training in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). Sep 06, 2024;16(3):e12626. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Chan AT, Ip RT, Tran JY, Chan JY, Tsoi KK. Computerized cognitive training for memory functions in mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digit Med. Jan 03, 2024;7(1):1. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Rossetto F, Isernia S, Realdon O, Borgnis F, Blasi V, Pagliari C, et al. A digital health home intervention for people within the Alzheimer's disease continuum: results from the Ability-TelerehABILITation pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Med. Dec 17, 2023;55(1):1080-1091. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Youn JH, Ryu SH, Lee JY, Park S, Cho SJ, Kwon H, et al. Brain structural changes after multi-strategic metamemory training in older adults with subjective memory complaints: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav. May 27, 2019;9(5):e01278. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Youn JH, Park S, Lee JY, Cho SJ, Kim J, Ryu SH. Cognitive improvement in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: evidence from a multi-strategic metamemory training. J Clin Med. Jan 28, 2020;9(2):362. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- McDougall GJ, Kang J. Memory self-efficacy and memory performance in older males. Int J Mens Health. May 1, 2003;2(2):131-147. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. Am Psychol. Oct 1979;34(10):906-911. [CrossRef]
- Tarricone P. The Taxonomy of Metacognition. London, UK. Psychology Press; 2011.
- Kim J, Shin E, Han K, Park S, Youn JH, Jin G, et al. Efficacy of smart speaker-based metamemory training in older adults: case-control cohort study. J Med Internet Res. Feb 16, 2021;23(2):e20177. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sella E, Carbone E, Vincenzi M, Toffalini E, Borella E. Efficacy of memory training interventions targeting metacognition for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health. Apr 11, 2023;27(4):674-694. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Youn JH, Lee JY, Kim S, Ryu SH. Multistrategic memory training with the metamemory concept in healthy older adults. Psychiatry Investig. Dec 2011;8(4):354-361. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. Sep 20, 2004;256(3):183-194. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease. Focus. Jan 1, 2013;11(1):96-106. [CrossRef]
- Mohs RC, Knopman D, Petersen RC, Ferris SH, Ernesto C, Grundman M, et al. Development of cognitive instruments for use in clinical trials of antidementia drugs: additions to the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale that broaden its scope. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 2:S13-S21. [Medline]
- Verma N, Beretvas SN, Pascual B, Masdeu JC, Markey MK, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. New scoring methodology improves the sensitivity of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) in clinical trials. Alzheimers Res Ther. Nov 12, 2015;7(1):64. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC, Hughes JP, van Belle G, Fillenbaum G, et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. Sep 1989;39(9):1159-1165. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lee JH, Lee KU, Lee DY, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim JH, et al. Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. Jan 01, 2002;57(1):P47-P53. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. Nov 1993;43(11):2412-2414. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. Dec 9, 2011;20(10):1727-1736. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kim SH, Ahn J, Ock M, Shin S, Park J, Luo N, et al. The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea. Qual Life Res. Jul 10, 2016;25(7):1845-1852. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Hassan MM, Hassan MM, Yasmin F, Khan MA, Zaman S, Galibuzzaman, et al. A comparative assessment of machine learning algorithms with the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator for breast cancer detection and prediction. Decis Anal J. Jun 2023;7:100245. [CrossRef]
- Doody RS, Thomas RG, Farlow M, Iwatsubo T, Vellas B, Joffe S, et al. Phase 3 trials of solanezumab for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. Jan 23, 2014;370(4):311-321. [CrossRef]
- Liu-Seifert H, Siemers E, Price K, Han B, Selzler KJ, Henley D, et al. Cognitive impairment precedes and predicts functional impairment in mild Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;47(1):205-214. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Eggenberger P, Schumacher V, Angst M, Theill N, de Bruin ED. Does multicomponent physical exercise with simultaneous cognitive training boost cognitive performance in older adults? A 6-month randomized controlled trial with a 1-year follow-up. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1335-1349. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Raghavan N, Samtani MN, Farnum M, Yang E, Novak G, Grundman M, et al. The ADAS-Cog revisited: novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog to improve efficiency in MCI and early AD trials. Alzheimers Dement. Feb 05, 2013;9(1 Suppl):S21-S31. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Cogo-Moreira H, Krance SH, Wu CY, Lanctôt KL, Herrmann N, Black SE, et al. State, trait, and accumulated features of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in mild Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). Mar 26, 2023;9(1):e12376. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Maki Y, Yamaguchi T, Yamagami T, Murai T, Hachisuka K, Miyamae F, et al. The impact of subjective memory complaints on quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. Psychogeriatrics. Sep 21, 2014;14(3):175-181. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Giuli C, Papa R, Lattanzio F, Postacchini D. The effects of cognitive training for elderly: results from my mind project. Rejuvenation Res. Dec 2016;19(6):485-494. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Han JW, Lee H, Hong JW, Kim K, Kim T, Byun HJ, et al. Multimodal cognitive enhancement therapy for patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a multi- center, randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover trial. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;55(2):787-796. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Fu E, Compton M. Non-pharmacological interventions that improve quality of life in people with mild cognitive impairment. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. Oct 28, 2021;39(4):31543-31547. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
- Shaw J, Hosseini SH. The effect of baseline performance and age on cognitive training improvements in older adults: a qualitative review. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. Jan 2021;8(1):100-109. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Perneczky R, Hartmann J, Grimmer T, Drzezga A, Kurz A. Cerebral metabolic correlates of the clinical dementia rating scale in mild cognitive impairment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. Jun 01, 2007;20(2):84-88. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- O'Bryant SE, Lacritz LH, Hall J, Waring SC, Chan W, Khodr ZG, et al. Validation of the new interpretive guidelines for the clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes score in the national Alzheimer's coordinating center database. Arch Neurol. Jun 01, 2010;67(6):746-749. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Tzeng RC, Yang YW, Hsu KC, Chang HT, Chiu PY. Sum of boxes of the clinical dementia rating scale highly predicts conversion or reversion in predementia stages. Front Aging Neurosci. Sep 23, 2022;14:1021792. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Vaghefi I, Tulu B. The continued use of mobile health apps: insights from a longitudinal study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Aug 29, 2019;7(8):e12983. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Belleville S, Gilbert B, Fontaine F, Gagnon L, Ménard E, Gauthier S. Improvement of episodic memory in persons with mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults: evidence from a cognitive intervention program. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. Nov 3, 2006;22(5-6):486-499. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Turunen M, Hokkanen L, Bäckman L, Stigsdotter-Neely A, Hänninen T, Paajanen T, et al. Computer-based cognitive training for older adults: determinants of adherence. PLoS One. Jul 10, 2019;14(7):e0219541. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
Abbreviations
| AD: Alzheimer disease |
| ADAS-Cog 14: Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 14 |
| CDR: Clinical Dementia Rating |
| CDR-SB: Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes |
| CERAD-NP: Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Neuropsychological Assessment Battery |
| LASSO: least absolute shrinkage and selection operator |
| MCI: mild cognitive impairment |
| MMT: metamemory training |
Edited by M O'Connell; submitted 31.Jul.2025; peer-reviewed by A-S Rigaud, P Kooncumchoo; comments to author 19.Oct.2025; accepted 05.Dec.2025; published 02.Jan.2026.
Copyright©Jung-In Lim, Yeeun Byeon, Sunyoung Kang, Hyeonjin Kim, Keun You Kim, Lukas Stenzel, So Yeon Jeon, Jun-Young Lee. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 02.Jan.2026.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

