This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Assisted Living for the Elderly and Nursing Home Care (162) Internet of Things (79) Robots in Healthcare (86) Extended Reality, Virtual Reality and Virtual Worlds (560) Assistive Technologies (115) Aging in Place (283)

Published on in Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Jul-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/17286, first published .
Emerging Technologies With Potential Care and Support Applications for Older People: Review of Gray Literature

Emerging Technologies With Potential Care and Support Applications for Older People: Review of Gray Literature

Emerging Technologies With Potential Care and Support Applications for Older People: Review of Gray Literature

Authors of this article:

Sarah Abdi1 Author Orcid Image ;   Luc de Witte1 Author Orcid Image ;   Mark Hawley1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (25) Tweetations (12) Metrics

    Review

    Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

    Corresponding Author:

    Mark Hawley, PhD

    Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare

    School of Health and Related Research

    The University of Sheffield

    The Innovation Centre

    217 Portobello

    Sheffield, S1 4DP

    United Kingdom

    Phone: 44 114 222 0682

    Email: mark.hawley@sheffield.ac.uk


    Background: The number of older people with unmet care and support needs is increasing substantially due to the challenges facing the formal and informal care systems. Emerging technological developments have the potential to address some of the care and support challenges of older people. However, limited work has been done to identify emerging technological developments with the potential to meet the care and support needs of the aging population.

    Objective: This review aimed to gain an overview of emerging technologies with potential care and support applications for older people, particularly for those living at home.

    Methods: A scoping gray literature review was carried out by using the databases of 13 key organizations, hand searching reference lists of included documents, using funding data, and consulting technology experts. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyze and summarize the findings of the literature review.

    Results: A total of 39 documents were included in the final analysis. From the analysis, 8 emerging technologies were identified that could potentially be used to meet older people’s needs in various care and support domains. These emerging technologies were (1) assistive autonomous robots; (2) self-driving vehicles; (3) artificial intelligence–enabled health smart apps and wearables; (4) new drug release mechanisms; (5) portable diagnostics; (6) voice-activated devices; (7) virtual, augmented, and mixed reality; and (8) intelligent homes. These emerging technologies were at different levels of development, with some being trialed for care applications, whereas others being in the early phases of development. However, only a few documents mentioned including older people during the process of designing and developing these technologies.

    Conclusions: This review has identified key emerging technologies with the potential to contribute to the support and care needs of older people. However, to increase the adoption of these technologies by older people, there is a need to involve them and other stakeholders, such as formal and informal carers, in the process of designing and developing these technologies.

    JMIR Aging 2020;3(2):e17286

    doi:10.2196/17286

    Keywords

    artificial intelligence; internet of things; mobile phone; robotics; emerging technologies; older people; care and support 


    Background

    Many older people are likely to require care and support in their later lives due to living with limiting long-term conditions [1,2]. These include support with activities related to mobility, daily living, and social life [2]. In the United Kingdom, for instance, it is estimated that around 20% of men and 30% of women aged 65 years and above currently require care and support with at least one activity of daily living (ADL), such as bathing and dressing [3]. In addition, many older people who require care and support prefer to continue living in their own homes, which is also a priority to several local authorities in the United Kingdom [4]. However, many of those are left with unmet needs due to the challenges facing the formal and informal care systems in the United Kingdom, such as limited funding to health and social care and physical and mental burden on family carers [5-7]. For example, a recent analysis of data from wave 7 of the English Longitudinal Study of Aging revealed that 55% of older people who have difficulty with at least one ADL received no formal or informal support [6]. Addressing the care and support needs of an aging population has, therefore, become an urgent health and social care priority, given the negative impact unmet needs have on older people as well as on the care systems [5,6].

    There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the potential of technology to meet older people’s care and support challenges. For example, data from recent systematic reviews have demonstrated the positive impact of a number of technologies on the physical and mental health of older people as well as on the social aspects of their lives [8-12]. Recent reports have also shown that older people enjoy the experience of using technology, are willing to engage with technology-based interventions, and tend to acknowledge its importance as a means to facilitate daily activities and communication [13-15]. However, older people adopt technology at lower rates compared with other age groups [16,17]. For example, more than 60% of internet nonusers in the United Kingdom are adults aged 75 or above [17]. Some of the main barriers that could influence and predict technology adoption by older people include lack of confidence in digital skills and lack of understanding of perceived value and positive impact of technology on their quality of life [13,14,16,18-22]. Many older people also face physical changes, such as cognitive decline, memory problems, and motor and sensory changes, that limit their use of available technologies [16,21,22]. A possible way to facilitate successful implementation of technologies targeting the care and support challenges of older people is to address the barriers to adoption during the process of technology design and development [23-26]. To achieve this, it will be important first to gain an overview of early phase technologies with potential care and support applications for older people. These technologies are increasingly referred to as emerging technologies [27].

    Emerging technologies are early stage technological developments with high potentials that are yet to be demonstrated [27]. In recent years, the use of the term has encountered significant growth, paralleled with efforts to define what characterizes an emerging technology [28]. One of the main characteristics of emerging technologies commonly mentioned in the literature is their ability to provide investing bodies a change in status quo by exerting economic or social impact [27,29-31]. In addition, two other characteristics that have general agreement among academic scholars are growth or increase over time and novelty or newness [28,32,33]. These attributes were acknowledged in a notable definition of emerging technology in the literature by Rotolo et al [28]. Rotolo et al [28] analyzed 12 definitions from the social science domain and identified 5 key attributes of an emerging technology: (1) radically novel, (2) relatively fast growing, (3) coherence persisting over time, (4) potential to have socioeconomic impact, and (5) uncertainty and ambiguity about potential applications [25]. However, despite these efforts, the challenges of defining and operationalizing the detection of emerging technologies are well acknowledged in the literature [27,28,32,33]. For example, using traditional quantitative measures, such as patent analysis, to examine the potential socioeconomic impact is acknowledged to be challenging [28]. Similarly, operationalizing all key attributes of emerging technologies at the same time is considered to be difficult, given that the available data sources can carry different pieces of information [32]. Overall, it is acknowledged that the concept of emerging technology and methods of operationalizing the term is still evolving [27,28,32,33]. Therefore, methods to identify emerging technologies will depend on the study objectives and information and data sources. For the purpose of this review, the term emerging technologies has been operationalized as technological developments that are novel and rapidly growing and have a potential socioeconomic impact.

    Some emerging technologies may help overcome common barriers of engagement with technology for older people. For example, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI)–based conversational platforms are said to simplify end users’ engagement with digital technologies by reducing the need for complex skills to navigate websites or other interfaces [34,35]. Arguably, this could help address older people’s limited digital skills. Similarly, self-driving vehicles have seen significant advances recently and could soon help address mobility needs of older people [36]. However, despite these potential benefits, there is limited evidence synthesis that focuses on identifying emerging technologies with potential care and support applications for older people. Most of the recent works have focused on exploring the effectiveness and perceptions of specific technologies among older people [12,14,25,37-40]. In one of the few recent reviews on this topic, Sapci and Sapci [41] investigated current research evidence on elderly care technology, in particular novel remote monitoring technologies [41]. They reported an increased interest in recent years on exploring the potential of sensor-based smart homes, robotic technologies, and AI to support elderly care. They also highlighted that the latter would play an increasing role in remote monitoring technologies. However, their review focused mainly on monitoring technologies. Arguably, there is a need to gain an overview of recent technological developments, given that other technologies might play a role in elderly care in the future. An overview of emerging technologies could also help identify developments that might not be currently used to meet the care needs of older people but could potentially meet their needs in the future.

    Therefore, a scoping review was conducted to gain an overview of emerging technologies with potential care and support applications for older people, particularly for those living at home. Literature searching was restricted to gray literature documents. This is because most of the overviews and analyses around emerging technologies tend to be found in the gray literature documents, such as funding bodies and science and technology institutes’ reports [42-44]. For example, the World Economic Forum and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, renowned institutes in science, business, and technology, publish regular reports on emerging technologies [35,36]. In addition, most of these reports focus on emerging technologies with potential social or economic impact, which could provide insights into an attribute that is difficult to operationalize in empirical literature [28]. Analyzing these reports could also provide timely information about emerging areas of technological developments, given the quick nature of publishing in gray literature as opposed to research literature [45-47].


    Study Design

    A scoping review design based on the Arksey and O’Malley original and enhanced framework was used to conduct this review [48,49]. A scoping review design was deemed appropriate as this method allows to search the literature systematically and summarize and disseminate the findings of the literature search [48,49]. Following a systematic approach in searching gray literature documents was important to improve the reproducibility of the review and overcome some of the challenges encountered when conducting gray literature searches, such as lack of standard indexing and nontraditional formats of documents [50,51]. The Arksey and O’Malley original and enhanced framework recommends 6 steps in conducting a scoping review: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant documents; (3) selecting the documents; (4) charting the data; (5) organizing, summarizing, and reporting the findings; and (6) consulting stakeholders (optional). The following sections describe the methods used to conduct the first 5 steps.

    Identifying the Research Question

    This review aimed at answering the following research question: What is known from the existing gray literature about emerging technological developments that could have potential care and support applications for older people living at home?

    Identifying Relevant Documents

    Identifying information sources for gray literature review depends largely on the objective of gray literature search [45,46,50]. For this review, reports from key organizations and data on ongoing research were deemed suitable to gain an overview of emerging technologies with potential care and support applications for older people. Several strategies have been used to identify relevant documents and minimize potential bias resulting from using a single search strategy for gray literature reviews [45,50]. First, key organizations were identified by running a Google search and based on their potential to publish documents related to the investigated topic. The web pages of these organizations were then searched for relevant documents using publication databases or free text search engines. Table 1 summarizes the strategies used to search each database.

    In addition, reference lists of included documents were hand-searched to identify more relevant documents. Technology experts were also consulted to identify organizations and key publications on the topic of emerging technology. Funding data were used as a complementary resource to understand ongoing research activities and provide timely information about technology developments [28]. Data from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) were identified for this purpose. EPSRC was selected as it is the main funding body for engineering and physical sciences research in the United Kingdom [52]. Data identified included research projects currently funded in relevant research areas, including engineering, information and communication technologies, health care technologies, AI, robotics, human-computer interaction, pervasive and ubiquitous computing and sensor and instrumentations, assistive technology, rehabilitation, and musculoskeletal biomechanics. The funding amount of the key research areas and EPSRC experts’ magazine (Pioneer) were also analyzed for the last 5 years (2015-2019).

    Table 1. Search strategy conducted on websites of key organizations.
    OrganizationsSearch methodsSearch terms
    DeloitteThe website search engine was used to look for publications. The date was limited to after January 2015.“Emerging” or “new” technologies were used as search terms.
    Department of Health and Social CareThe website search engine was used to look for publications. The date was limited to after January 2015.“Emerging” or “new” technologies were used as search terms.
    NHSaThe website search engine was used to look for publications. Date was limited to after January 2015.“Emerging” or “new” technologies were used as search terms.
    Nuffield TrustSearch was limited to “Health and Social Care finances and reform,” “Older people and complex care,” and “New models of Healthcare delivery.”“Emerging” or “new” technologies were used as search terms.
    MITbAll issues of MIT’s Technology review were screened from January 2015.N/Ac
    World Economic ForumAll reports under the publication and white paper sections were screened from January 2015.N/A
    King’s FundAll publications under the publication section were screened. No restriction was made on the topic. The date was limited from January 2015.N/A
    NestaAll publications in the health, AI, data analytics, and future scoping sections were screened. The date was limited from January 2015.N/A
    GartnerAll reports in the special reports section were screened. In addition, an advanced search was conducted using the website search engine using “Hype cycles” and “Knowledge and Innovation” filters.N/A
    European Parliament and CommissionAll publications, research, and reports under the EUd publications section were screened from January 2015.N/A
    Royal SocietyAll reports under the publications section were screened from January 2015.N/A
    United NationsAll publications in the multimedia library of the Economic and Social Affairs were screened. The date was limited from January 2015.N/A
    World Health OrganizationList of publications in Health Technologies was screened from January 2015.N/A

    aNHS: National Health Service.

    bMIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    cN/A: not applicable.

    dEU: European Union.

    Selecting the Documents

    Documents were selected as per predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. In brief, documents were selected if they described an emerging technological development that could potentially be used to meet the care and support needs of older people living in their own homes. This review focused on the following care and support domains: mobility, self-care and domestic life, social life and relationships, psychological support, and access to health care. These domains were identified in recent research as important areas of care and support for older people living at home [2]. It is important to also note that the technology did not necessarily need to be developed for older people. This is because emerging technologies are in early development stages, and some ambiguity might still be associated with their potential users [28]. Textbox 1 summarizes the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    Documents were screened in 3 steps: (1) screening the headings or titles of the documents; (2) screening the summaries of the documents such as executive summaries, overviews, and key findings; and (3) screening full text of the documents. The screening process was conducted primarily by the first author (SA). An opinion from a second reviewer (LW or MH) was sought in case of uncertainty. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart was used to summarize the screening and selection process.

    The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select documents.

    Documents were included if they

    • Described an emerging technology and used the term “emerging” explicitly or mentioned attributes of an emerging technology such as fast, new, novel, rapid, or potential societal or economic impact;
    • Described a potential application of the emerging technology in one of the following care and support domains: mobility, self-care and domestic life, social life and relationships, psychological support, and access to health care;
    • Described technological development that could potentially be used to support older people in their own homes or within a community setting;
    • Were reports or reviews published by the identified key organizations;
    • Publication date between January 2015 and July 2019;
    • Were published in English

    Documents were excluded if they

    • Described technical developments without mentioning potential applications;
    • Described non care and support applications (eg, water/food security, business, and marketing);
    • Focused exclusively on technologies used in a clinical setting (eg, during surgery or in hospitals). However, technologies used in clinical practice with potential uses in home such as remote monitoring were included;
    • Were blogs or news articles;
    • Were documents with highly restrictive use policy
    Textbox 1. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select documents.

    Charting the Data

    Data were extracted from documents deemed eligible for the final analysis using a data extraction form on Microsoft Excel. The form included the following information: the name of the organization, the year and title of the publication, the purpose of the document, methods used or sources of evidence, description of the technology, and potential care and support applications for technological development.

    Organizing, Summarizing, and Reporting the Findings

    The data extracted were summarized using a narrative synthesis approach [53]. The analysis started with the development of an initial description of the key findings of the included documents. To facilitate this step, a summary table was developed listing the main emerging technologies and application areas mentioned in each document. The next phase aimed to identify the categories of emerging technologies with potential care and support applications. It involved comparing and contrasting findings within each document as well as across the full data set. This phase of analysis revealed the complexity of the topic investigated. For example, some technologies were identified as emerging breakthroughs in some documents, whereas in other documents, these were identified as use cases or application areas of other technologies. This necessitated the distinction between emerging technologies that have enabled recent technological advances (enabling technologies) and those that could be used to meet the care and support needs of older people. This review focuses on reporting the findings of the latter. A description of each of these technologies was developed. Some examples were also provided on how these technologies were enabled by the emerging enabling technologies.


    Summary of Literature Search

    A total of 2158 records were screened from organizations’ websites, of which 58 were found eligible and were included in the full-text assessment phase. In addition, 23 records were identified from other sources and were screened for eligibility (5 from hand searching-included documents, 3 from speaking to experts, and 15 from funding data). A total of 39 documents were included in the final analysis. Figure 1 summarizes the screening and selection process using a PRISMA flowchart. The characteristics of the documents included in the final analysis can be found in Multimedia Appendix 1 [54-92].

    ‎
    Figure 1. A summary of the screening and selection process using a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart.
    View this figure

    Key Findings

    The analysis identified the following 8 emerging technologies that could have potential care and support applications for older people: (1) assistive autonomous robots; (2) self-driving vehicles; (3) AI-enabled health smart apps and wearables; (4) new drug release mechanisms; (5) portable diagnostics; (6) voice-activated devices; (7) virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR); and (8) intelligent homes. These technologies were mainly enabled by advances occurring in the fields of AI and subset technologies (eg, natural language processing [NLP], computer vision, and speech recognition), robotics, sensor technology, and advances in connectivity and computing (eg, fifth-generation cellular wireless [5G] and edge computing). The following sections provide a summary of each of these emerging technologies.

    Assistive Autonomous Robots

    Assistive robotics is a field within robotics concerned with developing robots that can assist people to manage their physical and social difficulties [54]. Assistive robotics was identified in some documents as one of the main emerging robotic developments with potential care and support applications [55-58]. This increased interest could be largely attributed to advances in AI, sensors, and human-computer interfaces [56-58]. For example, robotic dexterity, or the ability to grasp or manipulate objects, has recently experienced significant development owing to improvements in AI systems’ ability to learn via trial and error [56]. If these learning abilities are significantly improved in the future, robotic dexterity might be able to support some household and self-care tasks for older people, such as getting out of bed and assembling gadgets [56]. Wearable robotics, including suits and exoskeletons, are also expected to be used for mobility needs of older people in the near future because of reductions in the cost and size of these technologies [57,59,60]. In addition, brain-computer interfaces, one of the recent advances in human-computer interfaces, are also allowing new ways to control robotic prostheses and exoskeletons by creating neural bypasses [58,61]. These interfaces could enable potential applications for assistive robots in the rehabilitation of patients with severe paralysis, although they are still in the early stages of development [58,61]. Various ongoing projects are also capitalizing on AI and other enabling technologies to improve the autonomy of robots in real-life situations as well as to improve verbal and nonverbal interactions with end users, including older people [61]. For example, one research project is currently working on improving the image sensing and vision processing and control systems of robots, whereas another project is improving robots’ ability to analyze sounds in the environment [61]. Some of these efforts could translate into more autonomous robots in the future that are adaptive to older people’s environment and needs.

    Self-Driving Vehicles

    Self-driving vehicles were described in the reviewed documents as an emerging technology that could create new models of transportation, improve road safety, and reduce traffic congestion [57-59,62-65]. This technology could, therefore, potentially contribute to some of the transportation needs of older people in the future. However, some of the potential benefits of self-driving vehicles will depend largely on the level of automation that can be achieved. To date, significant progress has been made in creating semiautonomous vehicles (eg, Tesla autopilots), where the vehicle performs some automated functions; however, the driver’s engagement is still necessary [57,63]. A significant amount of work is also ongoing to achieve higher levels of automation [57,62-64], with some progress made recently in vehicles’ capabilities to perform all driving tasks in predefined geolocations (eg, Waymo’s autonomous taxis) [62]. However, developing fully autonomous vehicles, where they can perform all driving tasks in any environment, is complex and might be difficult to achieve in the near future [57].

    AI-Based Health Apps and Wearables

    AI and other enabling technologies are driving the development of new generation of smart apps and wearables [56,66-74]. These apps and wearables can potentially support older people to meet their needs in psychological support, self-care, and access to health care domains. For example, AI-based chatbots are at the core of a new wave of smart apps designed to provide advice to support treatments of chronic conditions, such as cognitive behavioral therapy for mental health [56,63,70]. Some of these AI chatbots also offer medical triage and advice about possible disease diagnosis before seeing doctors (eg, the Babylon app and Ada Health Companion) [69,70]. In addition, wearables such as smart watches and textiles are moving from only tracking fitness and physical activities to measuring physiological parameters and vital signs such as heart rate, electrocardiogram, and blood oxygen [56,63,74]. These developments allow wearables linked to smart apps and AI-based systems to detect early signs of disease exacerbation and help prevent further health deterioration [56,74]. The role of this new generation of wearables in the remote care of long-term conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mental health, is currently being investigated in several research projects in the United Kingdom [61,75].

    New Drug Release Mechanisms

    The analysis identified emerging drug release mechanisms that could offer new ways for administering medications [76-78]. Some of these drug release mechanisms are enabled by developments in sensors, AI, and other enabling technologies. For example, digital pills have been developed to deliver drugs automatically using a system that involves biosensors, smart apps, and wearable sensors [77]. This development was identified in 2016 as a trend that could have transformative impact on health [77], although it has not been widely discussed in the subsequent years. DNA origami is another development that could have potential drug delivery applications in the future [76]. These nanolevel DNA folded structures could benefit from developments in AI and sensors to act as nanorobots that could be programmed to deliver targeted therapy [76]. However, these developments are still in the early stages.

    Portable Diagnostics

    Emerging developments of point-of-care diagnostics, particularly those using smartphones, could facilitate access to health care for older people [55,57,77,79,80]. Significant work is currently ongoing to enhance sensors’ ability to detect various metabolites in body fluids and to enable spectroscopy in diagnostic devices [79,80]. These projects are paralleled with efforts to improve the detection speed, size, cost, and accuracy of these sensors [80]. Portable diagnostics equipped with these kinds of sensors are expected to bring disease diagnosis closer to patients, for instance, in the home environment [55,57,80]. However, it was not clear from the reviewed documents whether end users of these diagnostics will include patients themselves. In addition, the need to improve the diagnostic process and link data from these devices to care services and pathways has been identified [55]. Improving the process of diagnosis is also an area where AI advances hold some promising potential [71,75].

    Voice-Activated Devices

    Voice-based interfaces are one of the main emerging user interfaces identified in the documents, enabled by advances in numerous technological fields, including AI, speech recognition, and NLP [57,81-83]. These interfaces, sometimes referred to as conversational interfaces, virtual personal assistants, chatbots, or digital helpers, use end users’ speech or voice as a means to interact with the technology [57,81-83]. Voice-based interfaces have the potential to support older people in the self-care, access to health care, and social life domains. For example, voice-activated devices, such as Google Assistant and Amazon’s Alexa, can act as home digital helpers that assist older people with tasks such as providing information, medication reminders, video calling, and home entertainment [82]. These devices can also be used as platforms to control various home appliances and contribute to creating automated home experiences [82]. Significant work is also ongoing to enable voice-based interfaces to assist with more complex tasks such as web-based medical triage and self-management of chronic conditions [58,69,71,73].

    Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality

    VR, AR, and MR are other emerging user interfaces identified from the analyzed documents [64,73,81,83-88]. These interfaces use a virtual world (VR) or a combination of virtual and real worlds (AR or MR) to enable immersive digital experiences [57,59,84-86]. VR, AR, and MR have the potential to support older people in social life, psychological health, and domestic life domains. For example, these emerging user interfaces are expected to enable more immersive experiences in various aspects of everyday life, including web-based home shopping, leisure activities, and communication, through the use of devices such as headsets, smart glasses, and new generations of smartphones [83,87,88]. An increased interest is also observed recently on the potential of VR, AR, and MR to support the management of mental health conditions [55,83]. Emerging advances in connectivity (eg, 5G mobile network) are also expected to improve users’ experience with VR, AR, and MR interfaces by enabling visual data transfer and processing without lags [81,88].

    Intelligent Homes

    Intelligent homes that are adaptive to users’ needs and preferences is an emerging technology that could have potential care and support applications for older people [61,82,85,87-90]. Intelligent homes are largely enabled by the internet of things (IoT) technology—a system that transfers and processes data from a group of internet-connected physical devices [63,91]. For example, IoT home systems enable automated home experiences by allowing home devices, such as lights, heat, voice-activated devices, and even mobile robots, to connect and exchange information with each other [76,82,85,91,92]. IoT systems could also be used for remote health monitoring in the home environment through monitoring and detecting changes in health and activity patterns [54,63,90,91]. Home automation experience is also expected to improve in the near future owing to advances seen in network connectivity and computing paradigms (eg, 5G and edge computing) [81,89]. In addition, artificial emotional intelligence, an emerging field within AI concerned with detecting emotions, could potentially enable the development of intelligent home devices that can adapt to users’ verbal and nonverbal behaviors [84].


    Principal Findings

    The aim of this review was to gain an overview of emerging technologies with potential care and support applications for older people. The analysis identified 8 emerging technologies that could potentially be used to meet older people’s care needs in self-care, domestic life, mobility, psychological support, social life, and access to health care. These emerging technologies were assistive autonomous robots; self-driving vehicles; AI-based health apps and wearables; new drug delivery systems; portable diagnostics; voice-activated devices; intelligent homes; and VR, AR, and MR. Some of these technologies are recognized in the empirical literature as emerging developments that could have care applications for older people. For example, Sapci and Sapci [41] identified smart homes as an innovative assistive technology that could support aging in place. VR, self-driving vehicles, and IoT-enabled home devices were also identified in a more recent study as emerging technologies that could support older people manage health and maintain their independence [93]. Similarly, increased interest has been observed in the literature in recent years to explore the potential of assistive robots, smart homes, and voice-activated devices to support the care of older people [94-100]. It is also worth noting that many of the care applications of the emerging technologies identified in this review were health related. This might be because of the interests of the organizations included in this review. However, it could also mean that some ambiguity is still associated with potential uses of these emerging technologies in other care domains. Ambiguity regarding potential applications is indeed one of the main characteristics of emerging technologies [28] and could have influenced the applications presented in this review.

    This review also highlighted that emerging technologies are at different levels of development. Some, for instance, are at early phases of development such as DNA origami, whereas others are being trialed for care applications such as using AI chatbots and VR for mental health management. However, despite many documents discussing the potential of these technologies to support various care and support domains, very few have mentioned the inclusion of older people in the design of these technologies. The needs and functional preferences of older people can indeed be overlooked during the development and design of technology [36,101]. This could result in the development of technology products that do not meet the care needs of older people, hindering their adoption by this population [93]. Using human-centered design principles and involving older people during the different stages of technology design and development will therefore be important to develop products that are desirable and usable by older people [25,101,102]. Emerging technologies identified in this review, in particular, offer an exceptional opportunity to achieve this, given that many are still in the early phases of development. In addition, it will be important to involve other stakeholders in the design process, such as family carers and care professionals, to ensure that the developed products are supported by older people’s formal and informal care systems [102].

    This review also highlighted the complexity of recent technological developments, requiring a distinction to be made during the analysis phase between enabling technologies and those that could potentially be used to meet care needs of older people. Recent waves of technological developments are well recognized for their interdependencies, where new innovations are often the outcome of interactions between various fields [103,104]. Self-driving vehicles and intelligent homes, identified in this review, are good examples of innovations resulting from interactions between various technological fields, including sensors, AI, robotics, and advanced network connectivity.

    These complex interactions will need to be taken into account when developing technology products targeting older people, as this could mean the need to draw on knowledge from various technological fields.

    This review has several strengths. One of the strengths is following a systematic approach to search the gray literature. This systematic approach might have overcome some of the challenges associated with searching gray literature and reduced the possibility of missing key documents. Another strength is disentangling some of the complexities associated with recent technological developments to provide an overview of emerging technologies with potential care and support applications for older people. In addition, the inclusion of technological developments that were described only with the key attributes of emerging technologies may have helped overcome some of the inconsistencies associated with defining the term in the reviewed documents.

    Finally, this review was exploratory in nature, where it aimed to identify emerging technological developments that could potentially be used to meet the care and support needs of older people. Therefore, issues around technology acceptability, feasibility, adoption, and ethical considerations were beyond the scope of this review. However, the results of this review will inform future work that will explore some of these issues and investigate which of the technologies identified in this review has most potential to meet the care and support needs of older people. It will involve working closely with a panel of technology experts to prioritize these technologies. This review also resulted in some implications for future research. It reinforced the importance of co-designing technology solutions and involving older people and other stakeholders, such as carers and care professionals, at various stages of technology design and development. In addition, research and development related to emerging technologies might need to be interdisciplinary, given the interdependencies and complexity of recent technological advances.

    Limitations

    There are some limitations that need to be acknowledged. The search and analysis processes were conducted primarily by the first author (SA). There is a possibility that this was influenced by the author’s own perceptions and interpretations. However, the process of the search and analysis was discussed regularly with the research team to minimize potential bias. There is also a possibility that the search strategies missed key literature in other languages. In addition, many of the included documents were published in the United Kingdom and the United States; therefore, there is a possibility that this review missed some technological developments occurring in other parts of the world. Finally, there might be a need to consolidate the review findings with experts’ consultations or studies from peer-reviewed literature, as some gray literature sources do not go through a rigorous review process.

    Conclusions

    In summary, this review provided an overview of emerging technologies with potential care and support applications for older people. A total of 8 emerging technologies were identified, including self-driving vehicles, assistive autonomous robots, intelligent homes, VR and AR, AI-enabled apps and wearables, voice-activated devices, portable diagnostics, and new drug release mechanisms. These technologies were at different levels of development, with some being trialed for care applications, whereas others are in the early stages of development. The results of this review can be used by researchers, designers, and developers to gain an overview of the topic investigated as well as co-design applications of some of the technologies identified with older people. Formal and informal carers might also be interested in exploring some of the technologies identified to meet the care needs of their care recipients. The findings of this review will be used by the research team to investigate which of the emerging technologies identified has the most potential to meet the care and support needs of older people.

    Acknowledgments

    The lead author (SA) is a PhD researcher at the Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Health Care at the School of Health and Related Research at the University of Sheffield. The PhD is funded by the University of Sheffield. This work has been conducted as part of the PhD program. The funding body had no active role in the design of the review, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, and writing of the manuscript.

    Authors' Contributions

    SA took the lead in developing the review protocol. MH and LW reviewed and approved the protocol. SA drafted the manuscript, and MH and LW contributed significantly to the subsequent drafts and the final manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Characteristics of the documents included in the final analysis.

    DOCX File , 47 KB
    1. Health State Life Expectancies, UK: 2014 to 2016. Office for National Statistics. 2017.   URL: https:/​/www.​ons.gov.uk/​peoplepopulationandcommunity/​healthandsocialcare/​healthandlifeexpectancies/​bulletins/​healthstatelifeexpectanciesuk/​2014to2016 [accessed 2020-07-16]
    2. Abdi S, Spann A, Borilovic J, de Witte L, Hawley M. Understanding the care and support needs of older people: a scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF). BMC Geriatr 2019 Jul 22;19(1):195 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Later Life in the United Kingdom. Age UK. 2019.   URL: https:/​/www.​ageuk.org.uk/​globalassets/​age-uk/​documents/​reports-and-publications/​later_life_uk_factsheet.​pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    4. Social Care for Older People: Home Truths. The King's Funds. 2016.   URL: https:/​/www.​kingsfund.org.uk/​sites/​default/​files/​field/​field_publication_file/​Social_care_older_people_Kings_Fund_Sep_2016.​pdf [accessed 2020-07-23]
    5. The Long-term Sustainability of the NHS and Adult Social Care. The House of Lords. 2017.   URL: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/ldselect/ldnhssus/151/151.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    6. Vlachantoni A. Unmet need for social care among older people. Ageing Soc 2017 Nov 7;39(4):657-684. [CrossRef]
    7. State of Caring. Carers UK. 2017.   URL: https://www.carersuk.org/for-professionals/policy/policy-library/state-of-caring-report-2017 [accessed 2020-07-16]
    8. Khosravi P, Ghapanchi AH. Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: a systematic literature review. Int J Med Inform 2016 Jan;85(1):17-26. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Khosravi P, Rezvani A, Wiewiora A. The impact of technology on older adults’ social isolation. Comput Hum Behav 2016 Oct;63:594-603. [CrossRef]
    10. Aarskog NK, Hunskår I, Bruvik F. Animal-assisted interventions with dogs and robotic animals for residents with dementia in nursing homes: a systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2019 May 13;37(2):77-93. [CrossRef]
    11. Brims L, Oliver K. Effectiveness of assistive technology in improving the safety of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health 2019 Aug;23(8):942-951. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Pu L, Moyle W, Jones C, Todorovic M. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist 2019 Jan 9;59(1):e37-e51. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Hill R, Betts LR, Gardner SE. Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput Hum Behav 2015 Jul;48:415-423. [CrossRef]
    14. Vaportzis E, Clausen MG, Gow AJ. Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: a focus group study. Front Psychol 2017 Oct 4;8:1687 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Kuerbis A, Mulliken A, Muench F, Moore AA, Gardner D. Older adults and mobile technology: factors that enhance and inhibit utilization in the context of behavioral health. Ment Health Addict 2017;2(2). [CrossRef]
    16. Anderson M, Perrin A. Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults. Pew Research Center. 2017.   URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/ [accessed 2020-07-28]
    17. Internet Users, UK: 2019. Office for National Statistics. 2019.   URL: https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/itandinternetindustry/bulletins/internetusers/2019 [accessed 2020-07-16]
    18. Berkowsky RW, Sharit J, Czaja SJ. Factors predicting decisions about technology adoption among older adults. Innov Aging 2018 Jan;2(1):igy002 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Peek ST, Wouters EJ, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJ. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2014 Apr;83(4):235-248 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2016 Oct;94:112-116. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Gitlow L. Technology use by older adults and barriers to using technology. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2014 Aug 12;32(3):271-280. [CrossRef]
    22. Fletcher J, Jensen R. Mobile health: barriers to mobile phone use in the aging population. Online J Nurse Inf 2015;19(3) [FREE Full text]
    23. Procter R, Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Rouncefield M, Hinder S. The day-to-day co-production of ageing in place. Comput Support Coop Work 2014;23(3):245-267 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Peek ST, Wouters EJ, Luijkx KG, Vrijhoef HJ. What it takes to successfully implement technology for aging in place: focus groups with stakeholders. J Med Internet Res 2016 May 3;18(5):e98 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Meiland F, Innes A, Mountain G, Robinson L, van der Roest H, García-Casal JA, et al. Technologies to support community-dwelling persons with dementia: a position paper on issues regarding development, usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, deployment, and ethics. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2017 Jan 16;4(1):e1 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Petrie H, Darzentas J. Older People and Robotic Technologies in the Home: Perspectives From Recent Research Literature. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 2017 Presented at: PETRA'17; June 21-23, 2017; Island of Rhodes, Greece. [CrossRef]
    27. Cozzens S, Gatchair S, Kang J, Kim K, Lee HJ, Ordóñez G, et al. Emerging technologies: quantitative identification and measurement. Technol Anal Strateg 2010 Apr;22(3):361-376. [CrossRef]
    28. Rotolo D, Hicks D, Martin BR. What is an emerging technology? Res Policy 2015 Dec;44(10):1827-1843. [CrossRef]
    29. Boon W, Moors E. Exploring emerging technologies using metaphors--a study of orphan drugs and pharmacogenomics. Soc Sci Med 2008 May;66(9):1915-1927. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Li M, Porter AL, Suominen A. Insights into relationships between disruptive technology/innovation and emerging technology: a bibliometric perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2018 Apr;129:285-296. [CrossRef]
    31. Srinivasan R. Sources, characteristics and effects of emerging technologies: research opportunities in innovation. Ind Mark Manag 2008 Aug;37(6):633-640. [CrossRef]
    32. Small H, Boyack KW, Klavans R. Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Res Policy 2014 Oct;43(8):1450-1467. [CrossRef]
    33. Carley SF, Newman NC, Porter AL, Garner JG. An indicator of technical emergence. Scientometrics 2018 Jan 27;115(1):35-49. [CrossRef]
    34. Følstad A, Brandtzæg PB. Chatbots and the new world of HCI. Interactions 2017 Jun 23;24(4):38-42. [CrossRef]
    35. Klopfenstein L, Delpriori S, Malatini S, Bogliolo A. The Rise of Bots: A Survey of Conversational Interfaces, Patterns, and Paradigms. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 2017 Presented at: DIS'17; June 10-14, 2017; Edinburgh, United Kingdom. [CrossRef]
    36. Pettigrew S, Cronin SL, Norman R. Brief report: the unrealized potential of autonomous vehicles for an aging population. J Aging Soc Policy 2019;31(5):486-496. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Wang RH, Sudhama A, Begum M, Huq R, Mihailidis A. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr 2017 Jan;29(1):67-79. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Puri A, Kim B, Nguyen O, Stolee P, Tung J, Lee J. User acceptance of wrist-worn activity trackers among community-dwelling older adults: mixed method study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017 Nov 15;5(11):e173 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Lüders M, Gjevjon ER. Being old in an always-on culture: older people's perceptions and experiences of online communication. Inf Soc 2017 Mar 8;33(2):64-75. [CrossRef]
    40. Steinert A, Haesner M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E. Activity-tracking devices for older adults: comparison and preferences. Univ Access Inf Soc 2017 Apr 8;17(2):411-419. [CrossRef]
    41. Sapci AH, Sapci HA. Innovative assisted living tools, remote monitoring technologies, artificial intelligence-driven solutions, and robotic systems for aging societies: systematic review. JMIR Aging 2019 Nov 29;2(2):e15429 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. MIT Technology Review Magazine. MIT Technology Review. 2019.   URL: https://www.technologyreview.com/magazine/2019/11/ [accessed 2020-07-16]
    43. Emerging Technologies. The World Economic Forum. 2019.   URL: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/archive/emerging-technologies/ [accessed 2020-07-16]
    44. Science and Technology Committee (Lords). UK Parliament. 2020.   URL: https:/​/www.​parliament.uk/​business/​committees/​committees-a-z/​lords-select/​science-and-technology-committee/​ [accessed 2020-07-16]
    45. Adams RJ, Smart P, Huff AS. Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. Int J Manag Rev 2016 Apr 19;19(4):432-454. [CrossRef]
    46. Enticott J, Buck K, Shawyer F. Finding 'hard to find' literature on hard to find groups: a novel technique to search grey literature on refugees and asylum seekers. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2018 Mar;27(1):e1580 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Pappas C, Williams I. Grey literature: its emerging importance. J Hosp Librariansh 2011 Jul;11(3):228-234. [CrossRef]
    48. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method 2005 Feb;8(1):19-32. [CrossRef]
    49. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010 Sep 20;5:69 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hanning RM, Leatherdale ST. Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst Rev 2015 Oct 22;4:138 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Turner AM, Liddy ED, Bradley J, Wheatley JA. Modeling public health interventions for improved access to the gray literature. J Med Libr Assoc 2005 Oct;93(4):487-494 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    52. About Us. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). 2019.   URL: https://epsrc.ukri.org/about/ [accessed 2020-05-11]
    53. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. CiteSeerX. 2006.   URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3100&rep=rep1&type=pdf [accessed 2020-07-28]
    54. Top 10 Emerging Technologies 2019. The World Economic Forum. 2019.   URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Top_10_Emerging_Technologies_2019_Report.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    55. Preparing the Healthcare Workforce To Deliver the Digital Future. The Topol Review — NHS Health Education England. 2019.   URL: https://topol.hee.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/HEE-Topol-Review-2019.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    56. Top 10 Emerging Technologies 2018. The World Economic Forum. 2018.   URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/Top10_Emerging_Technologies_report_2018.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    57. Frontier Technologies for Sustainable Development. United Nations. 2018.   URL: https:/​/www.​un.org/​development/​desa/​dpad/​wp-content/​uploads/​sites/​45/​publication/​WESS2018_full_web.​pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    58. MIT Technology Review Volume 120 Issue 2. MIT Technology Review. 2017.
    59. MIT Technology Review Volume 119 Issue 5. MIT Technology Review. 2016.
    60. Visualising our Portfolio. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). 2019.   URL: https:/​/epsrc.​ukri.org/​research/​ourportfolio/​vop/​pack/​RESEARCHAREA/​NONE/​THEME/​Information%20and%20Communication%20Technologies/​9999/​ [accessed 2019-07-16]
    61. Ethical, Social, and Political Challenges Of Artificial Intelligence in Health. Wellcome. 2018.   URL: https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/ai-in-health-ethical-social-political-challenges.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    62. MIT Technology Review Volume 121 Issue 4. MIT Technology Review. 2018.
    63. Achieving the Un Sustainable Development Goals. PA Consulting: Bringing Ingenuity to Life. 2017.   URL: https://www.paconsulting.com/insights/2018/sustainability/united-nations-global-compact/ [accessed 2020-07-16]
    64. MIT Technology Review Volume 119 Issue 6. MIT Technology Review. 2016.
    65. Deep Shift: 21 Ways Software Will Transform Global Society. The World Economic Forum. 2015.   URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Deep_Shift_Software_Transform_Society.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    66. Pionner: The Science Behind the Theory of Everything. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). 2015.   URL: https://epsrc.ukri.org/newsevents/pubs/pioneer15/ [accessed 2020-07-16]
    67. MIT Technology Review Volume 121 Issue 6. MIT Technology Review. 2018.
    68. Artificial intelligence (AI) in Healthcare and Research. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2018.   URL: https:/​/nuffieldbioethics.​org/​wp-content/​uploads/​Artificial-Intelligence-AI-in-healthcare-and-research.​pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    69. Confronting Dr Bot, Creating a People Powered Future for AI in Health. Nesta. 2018.   URL: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/confronting_dr_robot.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    70. The Promise Of Healthtech. Public. 2018.   URL: http://www.public.io/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/PUBLIC-The-Promise-of-HealthTech.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    71. Thinking On Its Own - AI In The NHS. Reform. 2018.   URL: https://reform.uk/research/thinking-its-own-ai-nhs [accessed 2020-07-16]
    72. MIT Technology Review Volume 118 Issue 4. MIT Technology Review. 2015.
    73. MIT Technology Review Volume 122 Issue 2. MIT Technology Review. 2019.
    74. What Will New Technology Mean For the NHS and Its Patients? Four Big Technological Trends. The King's Funds. 2018.   URL: https:/​/www.​kingsfund.org.uk/​sites/​default/​files/​2018-06/​NHS_at_70_what_will_new_technology_mean_for_the_NHS_0.​pdf [accessed 2020-07-23]
    75. Visualising our Portfolio. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).   URL: https:/​/epsrc.​ukri.org/​research/​ourportfolio/​vop/​pack/​RESEARCHAREA/​NONE/​THEME/​Healthcare%20Technologies/​9999/​ [accessed 2020-07-16]
    76. Health and Healthcare in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Global Future Council on the Future of Health and Healthcare 2016-2018. The World Economic Forum.   URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF__Shaping_the_Future_of_Health_Council_Report.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    77. The Digital Revolution: Eight Technologies That Will Change Health and Care. The King's Fund. 2016.   URL: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/eight-technologies-will-change-health-and-care [accessed 2020-07-16]
    78. Home Improvements: Science and Engineering for a Hi-Tech Low Carbon World. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). 2018.   URL: https://epsrc.ukri.org/newsevents/pubs/pioneer19/ [accessed 2020-07-16]
    79. Current EPSRC Support by Research Areas for the Engineering Theme. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). 2019.   URL: https://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/vop/pack/RESEARCHAREA/NONE/THEME/Engineering/9999/ [accessed 2020-07-16]
    80. Sensors and Instrumentation Research Area. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). 2019.   URL: https://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/vop/pie/THEME/NONE/RESEARCHAREA/94/9999/ [accessed 2020-07-16]
    81. Tech Trends 2019: Beyond the Digital Frontier. Deloitte. 2019.   URL: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/Tech-Trends-2019/DI_TechTrends2019.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    82. MIT Technology Review Volume 120 Issue 5. MIT Technology Review. 2019.
    83. MIT Technology Review Volume 119 Issue 2. MIT Technology Review. 2016.
    84. MIT Technology Review Volume 120 Issue 6. MIT Technology Review. 2017.
    85. MIT Technology Review Volume 119 Issue 4. MIT Technology Review. 2016.
    86. MIT Technology Review Volume 119 Issue 1. MIT Technology Review. 2016.
    87. MIT Technology Review Volume 120 Issue 4. MIT Technology Review. 2017.
    88. Tech Trends 2018: The Symphonic Enterprise. Deloitte. 2018.   URL: https:/​/www2.​deloitte.com/​content/​dam/​insights/​us/​articles/​Tech-Trends-2018/​4109_TechTrends-2018_FINAL.​pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    89. MIT Technology Review Volume 119 Issue 3. MIT Technology Review. 2016.
    90. Technological Innovations for Health and Wealth for an Ageing Global Population. The World Economic Forum. 2016.   URL: http:/​/www3.​weforum.org/​docs/​WEF_Global_Population_Ageing_Technological_Innovations_Health_Wealth_070916.​pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    91. Top 10 Emerging Technologies of 2016. The World Economic Forum. 2016.   URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GAC16_Top10_Emerging_Technologies_2016_report.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    92. Top 10 Emerging Technologies of 2015. The World Economic Forum. 2015.   URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Top10_Emerging_Technologies_2015.pdf [accessed 2020-07-16]
    93. Kadylak T, Cotten SR. United States older adults’ willingness to use emerging technologies. Inf Commun Soc 2020 Jan 20;23(5):736-750. [CrossRef]
    94. Kowalski J, Jaskulska A, Skorupska K, Abramczuk K, Biele C, Kope? W, et al. Older Adults and Voice Interaction: A Pilot Study with Google Home. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2019 Presented at: CHI EA'19; May 4-9, 2019; Glasgow, Scotland, UK. [CrossRef]
    95. Lee J. Speech and Gestures for Smart-Home Control and Interaction for Older Adults. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multimedia for Personal Health and Health Care. 2018 Presented at: HealthMedia'18; October 22-26, 2018; Seoul, Republic of Korea. [CrossRef]
    96. Khosla R, Chu M, Khaksar SM, Nguyen K, Nishida T. Engagement and experience of older people with socially assistive robots in home care. Assist Technol 2019 May 7:1-15 epub ahead of print. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    97. Łukasik S, Tobis S, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Suwalska A. Deloittecould robots help older people with age-related nutritional problems? Opinions of potential users. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018 Nov 12;15(11):2535 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    98. Penteridis L, D'Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, Giuliani F, Ricciardi F, Cavallo F, et al. Robotic and sensor technologies for mobility in older people. Rejuvenation Res 2017 Oct;20(5):401-410. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    99. Jung MM, Ludden GD. What do older adults and clinicians think about traditional mobility aids and exoskeleton technology? J Hum-Robot Interact 2019 Jun 20;8(2):1-17. [CrossRef]
    100. Al RG, Tokhi M. Fuzzy PID Control of Lower Limb Exoskeleton for Elderly Mobility. In: IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics. 2016 Presented at: AQTR'16; May 19-21, 2016; Cluj-Napoca, Romania. [CrossRef]
    101. Wang S, Bolling K, Mao W, Reichstadt J, Jeste D, Kim H, et al. Technology to support aging in place: older adults' perspectives. Healthcare (Basel) 2019 Apr 10;7(2) [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    102. Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Procter R, Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. Co-production in practice: how people with assisted living needs can help design and evolve technologies and services. Implement Sci 2015 May 26;10:75 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    103. Klaus S. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. London, UK: Portfolio Penguin; 2017.
    104. Lee M, Yun J, Pyka A, Won D, Kodama F, Schiuma G, et al. How to respond to the fourth industrial revolution, or the second information technology revolution? Dynamic new combinations between technology, market, and society through open innovation. JOItmC 2018 Jun 21;4(3):21. [CrossRef]

    ‎
    5G: fifth-generation cellular wireless
    ADL: activity of daily living
    AI: artificial intelligence
    AR: augmented reality
    EPSRC: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
    IoT: internet of things
    MR: mixed reality
    NLP: natural language processing
    PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    VR: virtual reality

    Edited by J Wang; submitted 03.12.19; peer-reviewed by L Gitlow, G Dermody, SA Steindal, S Yusif, G Goodall; comments to author 05.03.20; revised version received 18.05.20; accepted 21.06.20; published 11.08.20

    Copyright

    ©Sarah Abdi, Luc de Witte, Mark Hawley. Originally published in JMIR Aging (http://aging.jmir.org), 11.08.2020.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.