This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Information and Patient Education on Healthy Aging (22) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (492) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (545) Information Quality in Digital Media (318)

Published on in Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jan-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9216, first published .
A Tool That Assesses the Evidence, Transparency, and Usability of Online Health Information: Development and Reliability Assessment

A Tool That Assesses the Evidence, Transparency, and Usability of Online Health Information: Development and Reliability Assessment

A Tool That Assesses the Evidence, Transparency, and Usability of Online Health Information: Development and Reliability Assessment

Authors of this article:

Maureen Dobbins1 Author Orcid Image ;   Susannah Watson2 Author Orcid Image ;   Kristin Read1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kelly Graham2 Author Orcid Image ;   Reza Yousefi Nooraie3 Author Orcid Image ;   Anthony J Levinson4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Kim Y, Akhtar A, Natalwalla S, Goshua A, Wilson K, Busse J. Association between media attention and presentation of vaccination information on Canadian chiropractors’ websites: a prospective mixed-methods cohort study. CMAJ Open 2020;8(2):E338 View
  2. Davaris M, Dowsey M, Bunzli S, Choong P. Arthroplasty information on the internet. Bone & Joint Open 2020;1(4):64 View
  3. Davaris M, Dowsey M, Bunzli S, Choong P. Arthroplasty information on the internet. Bone & Joint Open 2020;1(4):64 View
  4. Król K, Zdonek D. The Quality of Infectious Disease Hospital Websites in Poland in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(2):642 View
  5. Davaris M, Dowsey M, Bunzli S, Choong P. Arthroplasty information on the internet. Bone & Joint Open 2020;1(4):64 View
  6. Cai H, King L, Dwyer J. Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer. Current Developments in Nutrition 2021;5(2):nzab002 View
  7. Kulkarni A, Wong M, Belsare T, Shah R, Yu Yu D, Coskun B, Holschuh C, Kakar V, Modrek S, Smirnova A. Quantifying the Quality of Web-Based Health Information on Student Health Center Websites Using a Software Tool: Design and Development Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(2):e32360 View
  8. Daraz L, Bouseh S. Developing a Quality Benchmark for Determining the Credibility of Web Health Information- a Protocol of a Gold Standard Approach. Frontiers in Digital Health 2021;3 View
  9. Thaker K, Chi Y, Birkhoff S, He D, Donovan H, Rosenblum L, Brusilovsky P, Hui V, Lee Y. Exploring Resource-Sharing Behaviors for Finding Relevant Health Resources: Analysis of an Online Ovarian Cancer Community. JMIR Cancer 2022;8(2):e33110 View
  10. Ismond K, Loch-Ismond E, Tandon P, Spiers J. An Evaluation of Online Cirrhosis-related Information Intended for Patients and Caregivers. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2023;21(3):835 View
  11. Bourdache L, Ould Brahim L, Wasserman S, Nicolas-Joseph M, Frati F, Belzile E, Lambert S. Evaluation of quality, readability, suitability, and usefulness of online resources available to cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2023;17(2):544 View
  12. Alexa J, Richter M, Bertsche T. Enhancing Evidence-Based Pharmacy by Comparing the Quality of Web-Based Information Sources to the EVInews Database: Randomized Controlled Trial With German Community Pharmacists. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e45582 View
  13. Zubiena L, Lewin O, Coleman R, Phezulu J, Ogunfiditimi G, Blackburn T, Joseph L. Development and testing of the health information website evaluation tool on neck pain websites – An analysis of reliability, validity, and utility. Patient Education and Counseling 2023;113:107762 View
  14. Egala S, Liang D, Boateng D. Social Media Health-Related Information Credibility and Reliability: An Integrated User Perceived Quality Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2024;71:5018 View