Search Results (1 to 10 of 1601 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 462 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 286 JMIR Research Protocols
- 145 JMIR Formative Research
- 143 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 75 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 69 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 61 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 59 JMIR Dermatology
- 47 JMIR Human Factors
- 38 JMIR Mental Health
- 25 JMIR Medical Education
- 23 JMIR Cancer
- 19 JMIR Aging
- 18 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 16 JMIR Serious Games
- 14 JMIR Cardio
- 14 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 13 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 13 Iproceedings
- 12 JMIR Diabetes
- 12 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 9 JMIR AI
- 8 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 7 JMIR Infodemiology
- 2 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 JMIR Nursing
- 2 JMIRx Med
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Large Language Model Symptom Identification From Clinical Text: Multicenter Study
With an overall α of .05, a Bonferroni adjustment for 12 comparisons (11 symptoms plus no symptoms) set the threshold at P
ICD-10 codelists (Multimedia Appendix 2) [4] for each symptom were compiled by 3 experts at BCH using online resources [43,44]. The panel collaboratively reviewed whether each candidate code met the inclusion or exclusion criteria defined in the symptom annotation guidelines. ICD-10 codes recorded at the time of ED discharge were matched against the final symptom codelists.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72984
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Capturing Community Perspectives in a Statewide Cancer Needs Assessment: Online Focus Group Study
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e63717
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Reach-Accept testing in the Chatbot arm was lower than in SMS text messaging (174/1051, 16.6% vs 555/1066, 52.1%; a RR 0.317, 98.33% CI 0.27‐0.38; P
Reach-Accept testing was higher among participants messaged every 10 days vs every 30 days (860/15,717, 5.5% vs 752/15,722, 4.8%; a RR 1.144, 97.5% CI 1.03‐1.28; P=.01; Table 2), and lower if the participants were offered access to PN compared with those in the no PN condition (680/15,718, 4.3% vs 932/15,721, 5.9%; a RR 0.729, 97.5% CI 0.65‐0.81; P
Out of 2117 participants
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e74145
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The Fisher exact test yielded P=.01, indicating a statistically significant difference.
As shown in Table 2, the average word count of the original notes was 320 words, and the average length reduction of the H-summaries and U-summaries was 22% (SD 15%) and 23% (SD 15%) words, respectively. A negative number for length reduction in Table 2 indicates that the summary generated had more words than the original text.
In our analysis, we identified 3 instances of false information in U-summaries.
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e66476
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Mean EMAs completed in the incentivized arm was 13.3 (SD 11.2, range 0‐40, average completion rate of 31.7% out of 42 total EMA prompts) and 4.7 (SD 5.8, range 0‐28, average completion rate of 11.2% out of 42 total EMA prompts) in the nonincentivized arm (P
Smoking cessation outcomes overall and by group.
a EMA: ecological momentary assessment.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67630
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A Bonferroni correction was applied to all P values by multiplying each P value by 4, the number of tests conducted, to correct for multiple comparisons; a P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant after correction.
Timelines of OARS use were also described for MOUD providers and case managers. All analyses were conducted in R (version 4.2.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing). All qualitative data were analyzed using a coding reliability thematic analysis approach [16].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69953
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
All P values for Pearson correlation coefficients
b PSS-4: Perceived Stress Scale-4.
c ACC: adversity coping capability.
d PHQ-4: Patient Health Questionnaire-4.
e Not applicable.
Figure 1 shows the distribution of perceived xingfu and happiness scores. As both perceived xingfu and happiness peaked at scores of 7 (22%) and 8 (23%); therefore, perceived xingfu ≥7 was classified as high perceived xingfu in the logistic regression model.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73350
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS