e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 604 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 152 JMIR Formative Research
- 139 JMIR Human Factors
- 75 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 50 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 31 JMIR Research Protocols
- 23 JMIR Serious Games
- 22 JMIR Aging
- 20 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 15 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 13 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 12 JMIR Cancer
- 9 JMIR Mental Health
- 8 JMIR Medical Education
- 6 JMIR Cardio
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 3 Iproceedings
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 3 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
To further enhance the algorithms and features of the AI chatbot, it is essential to test its usability among a large number of end-users using predefined metrics. Therefore, we conducted this observational study to evaluate the usability of our AI chatbot for promoting HIV testing among MSM in Malaysia.
The AI chatbot was created and embedded into the website MYHIV365.com. The description of the chatbot and the website has been published elsewhere [6].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e70034
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
After an initial build of the platform to include the functionality of an initial assessment of the caregiving situation followed by access to the safety and emotions domains of the GP4 C content, we conducted caregiver usability testing on these domains to identify additional design needs in preparation for a randomized trial.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e60143
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Conversational Systems for Social Care in Older Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review
A recent systematic review of AI conversational agents in health care identified positive or mixed evidence for effectiveness and usability [24]. Still, it highlights that qualitative perceptions of these technologies could be more guarded. Many studies lacked rigorous designs or sufficient reporting, limiting conclusive assessments of their clinical and operational impact.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e72310
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
To measure the overall usability of m Health technologies, the system usability scale (SUS) is a widely used instrument, which showed robust results in previous studies [24]. In addition, usability studies often report on ease of use, user experience, and user engagement, depending on the focus of the study [25].
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e69079
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Usability and Quality of the JoyPop App: Prospective Evaluation Study
Despite this, the majority of mental health apps available in major marketplaces have not undergone usability and quality evaluations [35,37,38].
Usability is defined as a “quality attribute that assesses how easy interfaces are to use” [39]. Evaluating mental health app usability can reveal factors (eg, functionality, feature usefulness, layout, and readability) that reduce engagement and use [35,36].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65472
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A key determinant of implementation success is an intervention’s usability [17]. Usability is the extent to which a product can be used easily, effectively, and with satisfaction to obtain specified goals [18]. Usability has been commonly referred to as a key factor in the successful implementation and sustainability of digital health apps [19], with poor usability being a primary reason for failed adoption [20].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e68297
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This study aimed to develop Joint Effort, a mobile app prototype designed to support CU self-management and reinforce PBS use among young adults, and to assess its usability.
IM is a rigorous, theory- and evidence-based approach that emphasizes the role of research and theory in the intervention development process [32]. Our process was based on IM and a co-design approach.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e71924
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Patient involvement in the development and implementation of m Health apps and its integration into EMR/EHR systems ensures that m Health apps and the integration are tailored to their needs, preferences, and concerns, thereby enhancing usability, engagement, and trust [18,23,24,26,31]. The integration of m Health app data into EMR/EHR systems provides significant benefits in several key areas [12,14,16,21,29].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e66650
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Although this is not in itself an assessment of usability, it revealed an important usability finding: a lack of digital experience did not impact overall cognitive performance scores in a sample of older game users with low digital literacy and experience. A potential reason for this result may be the cautious and simplistic design of the SASG interface, which supported usability for the target cohort.
JMIR Aging 2025;8:e65252
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility, usability, and safety of 12 weeks of daily use of a home-based biofeedback system as a preventative in adults with episodic migraine. The findings of the study are intended to lead to refinements in the feasibility and usability of Cerebri (version 0.1.0; Nordic Brain Tech AS) and guide study design choices for a future randomized controlled trial.
The study was a single-center, open-label, one-armed interventional trial conducted at St.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e59622
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS