e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 8 of 8 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 2 JMIR Formative Research
- 2 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The root cause description associated with each recall event was used to characterize the particular recall. Some recall events may be associated with more than one root cause.
In 21 CFR 7.46 (firm-initiated recall), when the initiating firm decides to remove or correct distributed products, reasons for removal or correction must be provided.
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e67552
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Though the manufacturer (Prophet Premium Blends, LLC) initiated a recall of these products on June 27, 2024, and agreed to cease production and distribution of the Diamond Shruumz product line, assessing if there was continued online availability and whether retailers were compliant with recall requirements has not been adequately studied [6,7].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64820
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Health information recall refers to the participant’s ability to remember and recall the information provided by the animation video immediately after receiving it or during a follow-up period. Therefore, all studies that aimed to measure information recall, knowledge gain, or acquisition of information about the specific disorders as a primary or secondary outcome were included.
This review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were peer-reviewed.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58306
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The quality of data gathered is contingent upon a patient’s recall capacity. Studies consistently show recall of medical information is low. Patients remember between 20% and 60% of the information provided by health care practitioners immediately after an encounter [1], dropping to 12.8% a month later [2]. In a seminal study of patient recall in a routine clinical setting by Anderson et al [3], of the 40% of medical information recalled by patients, 48% of it was misconstrued.
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e52096
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
User Requirements in Developing a Novel Dietary Assessment Tool for Children: Mixed Methods Study
Parental lunch dietary intake data gathered in the questionnaire were used as the criterion to assess successful recall by the children, instead of more objective direct lunch observation, to be able to create a study environment that is comfortable and engaging for children. Testing order for Food Bear and my Bear was alternated across participants.
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e47850
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Participants with MCI or mild AD completed fewer remote assessments than CU participants (adherence for immediate recall: 64.5% vs 77.5%; delayed recall: 61.5% vs 77.3%; Figure 2). Group differences were confirmed by mixed logistic regression analyses (immediate recall estimate=−0.97; P=.01 and delayed recall estimate=−0.84; P=.02).
JMIR Aging 2022;5(3):e37090
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Effects of Interactivity on Recall of Health Information: Experimental Study
The measure of recall was based on the construction integration model [41] that distinguishes between two levels of comprehension: the text base level (ie, literal recall of information) and the situation model level (ie, to make inferences to situations based on the information) comprehension.
J Med Internet Res 2020;22(10):e14783
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The four strategies were applied for each of the 28,313 Me SH descriptors, and their respective performance was assessed by computing standard metrics (precision, recall, and F-measure).
Figure 1 depicts how the metrics were computed. Precision was defined as the fraction of relevant citations among the retrieved citations. Recall was defined as the fraction of relevant citations retrieved from the total number of relevant citations.
JMIR Med Inform 2020;8(6):e12799
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS