e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 260 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 101 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 54 JMIR Infodemiology
- 42 JMIR Formative Research
- 20 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 11 JMIR Dermatology
- 10 JMIR Research Protocols
- 7 JMIRx Med
- 5 JMIR Cancer
- 4 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Online Interventions Addressing Health Misinformation: Scoping Review
Misinformation is defined as “false information that is spread, regardless of whether there is intent to mislead” [1]. Misinformation in health and health care contexts has emerged as a significant and growing concern, particularly in the digital age where the spread of information is rapid and often unchecked.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69618
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The crisis in the vaccination system and the resurgence of antivaccine movements are due to the increased accessibility of misinformation and the reduced credibility of health care personnel [9-11]. The internet and social media have changed the way the public accesses health information [12,13].
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e63223
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Concerns Regarding the Methodology of a Psychological Inoculation Meta-Analysis on Misinformation
The study “Psychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing Intention, and Discernment of Misinformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” [1] was published in volume 25 of the Journal of Medical Internet Research. It is the only meta-analysis we know of that aims to synthesize effects pertaining to all inoculation interventions against misinformation. It has been cited widely, including within an American Psychological Association consensus statement [2].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64430
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
E-cigarette–related misinformation is widely shared on social media, which can lower perceived health risks and undermine adolescents’ and young adults’ quit attempts [1]. As extensive social media use is associated with e-cigarette use among adolescents and young adults [2-4], and seeking information about e-cigarettes predicts future use [5], it is crucial that the information being accessed is accurate and up to date.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73193
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
As misinformation became more prevalent on social media, exacerbated by the terming of “fake news” and a global pandemic, more research was conducted on clarifying the definition of misinformation and classifying the different kinds of misinformation. The term “misinformation” is often used interchangeably with related concepts such as spam, rumors, fake news, and disinformation.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e57951
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Impact of Misinformation on Social Media in the Context of Natural Disasters: Narrative Review
This rapid onset and escalation of natural disasters can amplify the spread of misinformation on social media platforms in unique ways. For this reason, examining misinformation specifically within the context of natural disasters offers valuable insights into the role of social media in crisis communication.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e70413
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Cancer misinformation can negatively impact health outcomes and increase mortality risk if patients forgo conventional cancer treatment for unproven alternatives [7,8]. These risks demonstrate an urgency to strengthen the growing field of online cancer misinformation scholarship.
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e65887
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Efforts to address concerns and highlight the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines have been met with significant challenges, as the spread of misinformation on social media has hindered vaccine uptake [6].
As a result, multiple strategies have been implemented to identify vaccine misinformation.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65361
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Challenges such as the risk of disseminating misinformation, lack of personalization, and ethical concerns related to patient privacy have been noted [18-20].
Oncologists are at the forefront of cancer care. They serve as clinical decision makers and trusted advisors in patient education. Their role has evolved to include guiding patients through increasingly complex treatment options and emerging digital health tools.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71418
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Interventions to Counter Health Misinformation Among Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Misinformation and disinformation in health are significant issues because they undermine trust in public health authorities, scientists, and governments [1-4]. Health misinformation encompasses information that deviates from the established scientific consensus about a phenomenon [5]. Conversely, disinformation involves the intentional spread of inaccurate information with the aim of misleading or causing harm, while misinformation, although still incorrect, is shared without malicious intent [6].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e74138
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS