e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 10 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 5 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 2 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Developed and validated among Finnish health care professionals in 2022, the Digi Health Com (Digital Health Competence) instrument offers a more comprehensive scope than existing tools and is applicable to a wide range of health care professionals.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65373
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A Multidimensional Approach for Evaluating Reality in Social Media: Mixed Methods Study
The goal of this research was to advance the current knowledge about user evaluations of social media content and to develop and initially validate a measurement instrument for assessing social media realism. Given the pervasiveness of misinformation [1-3], our goal was to offer a general measure that can be used in diverse public health domains. These efforts aim to inform and enhance public health misinformation–countering efforts using digital media literacy. Toward this end, 2 studies were conducted.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e52058
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Participants who have responded to the survey and people in the investigators’ networks will be requested to send the survey instrument further to people who might be eligible for study participation. Additionally, the survey will also be distributed through the higher education institutes that investigators routinely collaborate with.
The survey will be distributed in the form of Google Forms. Participants are expected to take about 10-15 minutes to complete the entire questionnaire.
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e39707
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In this study, the EDLQ was developed using the 4 phases of instrument development and validation (conceptualization, item development, content validation, and a field survey) to evaluate its psychometric properties.
In accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, all procedures in this study have been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University (approval 4-2022-0396).
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e51616
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Most of the studies (n=15) aimed to adapt a certain measuring instrument to a specific client group and conduct validity and reliability testing (ie, psychometric properties and psychometric validation). The rest aimed to develop a measuring instrument (n=2), evaluate the usability of combining several instruments (n=1), and evaluate the content and response process of an instrument (n=1).
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e51450
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In the first round, the Delphi website included detailed information about each instrument with a description, number of items, link to the full text questionnaire, and references. Participants were shown all included PROMs and were asked to provide their opinion on each instrument, and if they had any experiences administering it in clinical or research settings.
JMIR Diabetes 2022;7(4):e38660
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
eHealth Literacy Instruments: Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
We included studies involving the development of an e Health literacy instrument or evaluations of its measurement properties published as full-text original articles in peer-reviewed journals written in English. If a study had utilized an e Health literacy instrument as an outcome measure and determined its measurement properties, such as Cronbach’s α, but not with the main purpose of evaluating measurement properties of an e Health literacy instrument, then the article was not included.
J Med Internet Res 2021;23(11):e30644
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
From this, an initial 10-question instrument (5 questions in each domain) was composed by PA and JSB, who have expertise in the field of aging and the internet. This list was reviewed together with a third expert, in the psychology of aging, and different aspects and formulations were discussed and agreed upon.
JMIR Aging 2021;4(2):e23591
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section