e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 8 of 8 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 JMIR Research Protocols
- 2 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
In clinical practice, it is vital for physicians to effectively communicate with patients using verbal and nonverbal behaviors to improve health outcomes and the overall patient-physician dyadic encounter [4]. Physicians who can appropriately interpret patients’ nonverbal cues lead to increased patient satisfaction, and patients are more likely to return for follow-up visits than physicians who are less likely to read patients’ nonverbal cues correctly [5].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59328
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Design of Digital Mental Health Platforms for Family Member Cocompletion: Scoping Review
Such DMHIs have shown promise in reaching underserved populations [21], leading to improved management of symptoms in individuals [22], particularly youth aged
Beyond DMHIs designed for individuals, 2 first-generation reviews of dyadic (caregiver and care recipient) [27] and couple-targeted DMHIs [28] suggest that DMHIs can decrease barriers and improve timely access and outcomes for distressed relationships. However, research into DMHIs for families to access together is as yet undeveloped.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e49431
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Evidence suggests that psychologically based dyadic interventions may reduce caregiver burden [12-14] and improve quality of life among persons living with dementia [13]. Dyadic interventions that target the person with dementia, the caregiver, and their interpersonal relationship can have synergistic effects on individual interventions and maximally benefit both members of the dyad [15,16].
Several barriers exist to engaging caregivers and persons with dementia in psychosocial interventions.
JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e52799
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Dyadic behavioral interventions are designed to support both the patient and their caregivers in coping with emotional and practical challenges [4]. Well-designed, dyadic programs can improve patients’ adherence to self-management recommendations, quality of life, and self-efficacy while reducing hospitalization rates [5,6]. Most [7] dyadic interventions require real-time communication between intervention recipients and health coaches or facilitators, either in person or via telephone.
JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e43903
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Few studies of MBIs use a dyadic approach in which both the person with dementia and their caregiver engage together in a mindfulness activity [15-19]. Dyadic MBI approaches have shown benefits, such as improved well-being, quality of life, depressive symptoms, relaxation, awareness, acceptance, and resilience [15,16,18]. Although studies reveal positive benefits for dyadic MBIs, there is a lack of focus on how the interventions are designed for the stakeholders.
JMIR Aging 2022;5(4):e40360
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Evidence to the contrary proves that although youth, particularly males, tend to engage in extra-dyadic sex (sex with someone other than their partners) [6] and have higher tendencies toward concurrency and serial monogamy [19], STI in AYA is more nuanced and complex, often occurring in the context of committed relationships with or without concurrency.
JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(5):e29389
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
There are several examples of dyadic interventions that aim to address HIV risk among same-sex male couples.
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020;6(1):e15078
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS