e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 2 of 2 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Companionship comes not only from humans but can also come from pets or other compassionate agents such as robots (eg, socially assistive robots, companion robots, and therapeutic robots).
Numerous studies have examined the potential health benefits of having a companion animal. For example, Gee and Mueller [18] showed that pet ownership and animal-assisted interventions for older adults led to physical and mental health benefits.
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e56669
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Gaseiger and colleagues [5] reported that older people living alone at home accepted a robot as a companion, and the functions of an aged care robot should be more personalized to meet older people’s health and social needs. A cross-sectional survey among middle-aged and older Taiwanese living in the community revealed that female participants preferred an animallike robot, while male participants favored a humanlike robot [11].
JMIR Aging 2023;6:e48646
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS