e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 49 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 14 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 11 JMIR Formative Research
- 4 JMIR Human Factors
- 4 JMIR Research Protocols
- 3 JMIR Medical Education
- 2 JMIR Mental Health
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Cancer
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Many studies did not specify the type of HCP and referred to their intended end user as “healthcare professional,” “clinician,” “clinical team,” or “healthcare provider” (8/52, 15%) [40,41,43,52,59,65,83,88].
The target settings for the DHTs also varied significantly across the included studies. The most common type of setting was primary care (12/52, 23%) [40,55,57,61-64,67,76,82,84,89].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66457
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

A clinician diagnosis of CKD has been associated with increased delivery of evidence-based care, as well as increased patient awareness of their kidney disease [9-11]. However, clinician detection of CKD and communication about kidney disease in the United States are suboptimal [12,13].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e56855
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Authors’ Reply: Advancing Digital Health Integration in Oncology
Our study underscored the critical role of clinician endorsements as external motivators that significantly influence both the intention to use and the actual usage of health care apps. However, the real-world application of digital tools in clinical settings often reveals a gap between controlled study environments and everyday clinical practice. In addressing this, we aimed to minimize such discrepancies by using commercial apps without structured reminders, thus fostering more natural user engagement.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72477
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Advancing Digital Health Integration in Oncology
To conclude, Park et al [1] have laid a solid foundation for understanding how patients with cancer adopt health care apps, emphasizing the centrality of user experience and clinician endorsement. However, broader integration of telemedicine advances, joint patient-provider acceptance, and interactive patient portal functionalities could drive higher engagement rates and better patient outcomes across diverse populations.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e70316
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Intervention: AI-powered clinician tools
Focus is on AI-powered clinician tools: the search targeted manuscript titles containing the terms (AI OR “Artificial Intelligence”).
Comparator: not applicable
There were no restrictions on eligible conditions for inclusion.
Outcome: assessment criteria
The search targeted manuscript titles also containing AND (assessment OR assess OR evaluation OR evaluating OR effectiveness OR efficacy OR quality OR efficiency OR usability OR usefulness).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67485
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

A study found that only 11% of 59 PRO questionnaires are readable by the average UK adult [15], emphasizing the need for a patient-clinician dialogue to enhance understanding and decision-making [5]. Numerical scores derived from PROs can represent a person’s health status or health-related quality of life to a limited extent because some of the narrative is lost along the way. In the representation of PRO data, there is a need to be able to give meaning to individual experiences [4].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e58077
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Participant demographics were collected, including age group, sex, facility (Gold Coast University Hospital, Robina Hospital, Varsity Lakes Day Hospital, health precinct, or community health), AH profession (audiology, clinical measurements, dietetics, medical imaging, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physiotherapy, podiatry, psychology, speech pathology, or social work), role (clinical informatics or technology, clinician, educator or clinical facilitator, governance, manager, researcher, or academic), years
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e57204
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Recognizing patients more as consumers, clinician recommendations play a crucial role in app retention, boosting confidence and adherence [60]. This underscores the potential of clinician recommendations to enhance adherence to digital health solutions.
Compared to other chronic diseases, the relationship between the patient with cancer and oncologist (surgical oncologist) is especially important in the dynamic treatment process and decision-making [61,62].
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55176
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS