e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 104 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 50 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 10 JMIR Research Protocols
- 10 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 6 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 5 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 5 JMIR Mental Health
- 3 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 2 JMIR Aging
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 2 JMIR Medical Education
- 2 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 2 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 1 JMIR Cardio
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025639976) and follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for reporting [83]. The PRISMA checklist has been uploaded as Checklist 1.
We retrieved a total of 482 publications from 4 databases and identified 56 records from clinical trial registration and 21 records from the reference lists of related systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e75000
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Application of Digital Tools in the Care of Patients With Diabetes: Scoping Review
This scoping review adopts the 5-step framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley [19] and is reported according to the PRISMA-Sc R (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines (see Checklist 1). During the development of the search strategy, we drew upon our in-depth understanding of the diabetes care field and preliminary investigations into research on digital tools.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72167
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This study was conducted in line with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines (the PRISMA 2020 checklist is provided in Checklist 1).
The original studies were first screened by 2 independent investigators (JN and YY) using titles and abstracts. They reviewed the entire text afterward, following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any disagreements or differing opinions would be discussed and resolved with a third party (YL).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73516
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 statement [38] and has been duly registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number CRD42024582905). As the data utilized in this research were exclusively sourced from previously published studies, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e74347
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
How AI-Based Digital Rehabilitation Improves End-User Adherence: Rapid Review
This review is in compliance with the updated recommendations for the Cochrane RR methods guidance and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations (Checklist 1) [24,26]. The Cochrane RR guidance consists of 24 specific recommendations supporting the conduct of RRs to enhance the efficiency of the review process [24].
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e69763
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement guidelines (Multimedia Appendix 1) [30]. The protocol was retrospectively registered in PROSPERO on May 25, 2025 (420251058005).
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e64754
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This systematic review was reported in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines [26] (the PRISMA checklist is provided in Checklist 1). Pub Med, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EBSCO (Elton B Stephens Company), Cochrane Library, the Chinese databases CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and WANFANG were searched from inception to April 24, 2024. This process was carried out independently by 2 researchers (LL & JNY).
Interact J Med Res 2025;14:e72231
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Applications of Ballistocardiogram in the Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease: Systematic Review
This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines [8] and conducted a systematic search of English-language literature up to April 14, 2024, across Pub Med, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library.
JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e68197
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Throughout the overview, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance was followed. The completed PRISMA checklist (Checklist 1) is included with the paper.
The search strategy was developed by the research team with the collaboration of an expert librarian. The bibliographic search was carried out without any restrictions (language, age of participants, etc).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65211
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Our systematic review follows the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook [14,15] and reports findings in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist [16]. This review systematically consolidates findings from the past 5 years to address underexplored areas of health care workers’ trust in AI-CDSSs, identifying both enablers and barriers within trust dynamics [14-16].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69678
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS