Search Results (1 to 5 of 5 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
 CSV download: Download all 5 search results
                                    (up to 5,000 articles maximum)
                                
- 3 JMIR Research Protocols
 - 2 JMIR Human Factors
 - 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
 - 0 Medicine 2.0
 - 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
 - 0 iProceedings
 - 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
 - 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
 - 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
 - 0 JMIR Serious Games
 - 0 JMIR Mental Health
 - 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
 - 0 JMIR Preprints
 - 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
 - 0 JMIR Medical Education
 - 0 JMIR Cancer
 - 0 JMIR Challenges
 - 0 JMIR Diabetes
 - 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
 - 0 JMIR Data
 - 0 JMIR Cardio
 - 0 JMIR Formative Research
 - 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
 - 0 JMIR Dermatology
 - 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
 - 0 JMIR Aging
 - 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
 - 0 JMIR Nursing
 - 0 JMIRx Med
 - 0 JMIRx Bio
 - 0 JMIR Infodemiology
 - 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
 - 0 JMIR AI
 - 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
 - 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
 - 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
 - 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
 

All health care professionals working in the preoperative geriatric clinic (n=10) who are responsible for performing the tasks of the p CGA will be approached and consented for direct observation and focus groups to provide feedback on the p CGA process map. Additional staff (n=5) engaged in the clinic (administrative leads and schedulers) will be invited to participate.
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e59428
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

We conducted 16 semistructured academic detailing interviews with emergency medicine resident physicians (n=10) and advanced practice providers (n=6) who had previously encountered our CDS tool in practice, that is, within the last month. All interviews took place between August 2020 and June 2022, with 6 of the 16 interviews occurring prior to the implementation of the CDS hard stop (Figure 1). We purposively selected a range of participants based on how frequently they responded to the CDS.
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e52592
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

This width provides sufficient precision for our study, considering that (1) a completion rate as small as 10% would be clinically meaningful and (2) we expect to observe a referral completion rate of 50% or higher—in which case, there would be nearly 100% power to reject a referral completion rate of 10% at a significance level of .05 when n=520.
JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e48128
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
 Go back to the top of the page  Skip and go to footer section 

Evaluating the Usability of an Emergency Department After Visit Summary: Staged Heuristic Evaluation
These experts include emergency medicine physicians (n=2), an ED nurse (n=1), a nurse with transitional care expertise (n=1), a primary care geriatrician (n=1), and an older adult care partner (n=1).
The type of expertise each expert provided was unique. The care partner referred to their perspective as an older adult and their lived experience having previously visited the ED with their partner 14 times over the course of 10 weeks.
JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e43729
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
