Search Results (1 to 10 of 1465 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 399 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 264 JMIR Research Protocols
- 152 JMIR Formative Research
- 147 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 69 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 59 JMIR Dermatology
- 55 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 52 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 42 JMIR Human Factors
- 33 JMIR Mental Health
- 24 JMIR Cancer
- 22 JMIR Medical Education
- 20 JMIR Aging
- 17 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 15 JMIR Serious Games
- 13 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 12 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 12 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 10 JMIR Cardio
- 9 JMIR Diabetes
- 8 Iproceedings
- 7 JMIR AI
- 6 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 4 JMIR Infodemiology
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIRx Med
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
With 47.3% adult population with hypertension in the United States in 2021 [29], using 5% type 1 error (P=.05), the minimum sample size required to estimate participation in RBPM was 383 participants [30]. A minimum of 500 sample size has been recommended for detecting differences between the sample estimates and the population in observational studies involving logistic regression [31]. We stopped recruitment as soon as possible when we reached a sample size of 500.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71926
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Capturing Community Perspectives in a Statewide Cancer Needs Assessment: Online Focus Group Study
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e63717
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Reach-Accept testing in the Chatbot arm was lower than in SMS text messaging (174/1051, 16.6% vs 555/1066, 52.1%; a RR 0.317, 98.33% CI 0.27‐0.38; P
Reach-Accept testing was higher among participants messaged every 10 days vs every 30 days (860/15,717, 5.5% vs 752/15,722, 4.8%; a RR 1.144, 97.5% CI 1.03‐1.28; P=.01; Table 2), and lower if the participants were offered access to PN compared with those in the no PN condition (680/15,718, 4.3% vs 932/15,721, 5.9%; a RR 0.729, 97.5% CI 0.65‐0.81; P
Out of 2117 participants
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e74145
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The Fisher exact test yielded P=.01, indicating a statistically significant difference.
As shown in Table 2, the average word count of the original notes was 320 words, and the average length reduction of the H-summaries and U-summaries was 22% (SD 15%) and 23% (SD 15%) words, respectively. A negative number for length reduction in Table 2 indicates that the summary generated had more words than the original text.
In our analysis, we identified 3 instances of false information in U-summaries.
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e66476
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Mean EMAs completed in the incentivized arm was 13.3 (SD 11.2, range 0‐40, average completion rate of 31.7% out of 42 total EMA prompts) and 4.7 (SD 5.8, range 0‐28, average completion rate of 11.2% out of 42 total EMA prompts) in the nonincentivized arm (P
Smoking cessation outcomes overall and by group.
a EMA: ecological momentary assessment.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67630
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Gender Equality Training for Students in Higher Education: Scoping Review
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e60061
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A Bonferroni correction was applied to all P values by multiplying each P value by 4, the number of tests conducted, to correct for multiple comparisons; a P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant after correction.
Timelines of OARS use were also described for MOUD providers and case managers. All analyses were conducted in R (version 4.2.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing). All qualitative data were analyzed using a coding reliability thematic analysis approach [16].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69953
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS