Search Results (1 to 10 of 25 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 12 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 3 JMIR Aging
- 3 JMIR Formative Research
- 3 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 2 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR Mental Health
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
Cybersecurity and Privacy Issues in Extended Reality Health Care Applications: Scoping Review
JMIR XR Spatial Comput 2024;1:e59409
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For example, Mc Ardle et al’s [8] review on the quantification of ambulatory activities in ARC reported that 26% of studies excluded people with cognitive impairment and only 17% explicitly characterized walking activities in people with cognitive impairment, despite a 65%-70% prevalence of cognitive impairment in ARC residents [17,18]. Additionally, no studies compared different levels of care.
JMIR Aging 2024;7:e53020
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
This was adapted in line with the study by Mc Ardle et al [28] for specific application in reviews of populations with cognitive impairments and digital technology; evidence was rated as poor, mediocre, or good [28,29]. The results of the quality assessment can be found in Multimedia Appendix 2.
The search identified 16,099 articles. After removing duplicates (n=9289), titles (n=6810) and abstracts (n=995) were screened, and 217 full texts were assessed for eligibility.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e45658
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
All titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened by 2 reviewers (authors RMA and KJB) using Rayyan software developed by Ouzzani et al [23], with a third reviewer settling disagreements (author MC). Information about the decision-making process can be found in Figure 1. Data extraction forms were developed on Excel (Microsoft Corp) by author RMA and refined in consultation with 2 other authors (MC and KJB).
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44352
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section