Search Results (1 to 10 of 3624 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1006 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 701 JMIR Research Protocols
- 376 JMIR Formative Research
- 297 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 163 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 126 JMIR Mental Health
- 125 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 96 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 89 JMIR Human Factors
- 76 JMIR Aging
- 71 JMIR Cancer
- 68 JMIR Serious Games
- 51 JMIR Medical Education
- 49 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 44 JMIR Dermatology
- 41 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 38 JMIR Cardio
- 35 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 32 JMIR Diabetes
- 27 Iproceedings
- 25 JMIRx Med
- 24 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 16 JMIR Infodemiology
- 14 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 13 JMIR AI
- 10 JMIR Nursing
- 4 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 2 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Digital Health, Telehealth and e-Innovation in Clinical Settings E-Health / Health Services Research and New Models of Care
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e70414
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The rise of internet use for health information and self-diagnosis fueled a movement of e-patients [5] even as medical professionals raised concerns regarding the impact of “Dr. Google” on patient-clinician relations. The ship is sailed: as many as half of Americans seek health care information online for themselves or others, without evidence of negative effects on health outcomes or the patient-clinician relationship [3,6,7].
J Particip Med 2025;17:e68146
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This finding could be related to a lack of integration of the e-mental health tools in the workplace, resulting in reduced effectiveness [64].
Indicated prevention using digitally supported tools appeared to be cost-effective [54], dominant (ie, better health outcomes at lower costs) [55,56,59,63], or cost-saving [60] (Figure 3).
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e72458
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Perotti et al [39] evaluated an e-learning to promote PHR competence and found how e-learning enhanced knowledge of PHRs, skill acquisition to use PHRs, and improved task completion. PHR providers are encouraged to develop and provide a publicly accessible e-learning for PHR users [39].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71915
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Patient Perspectives on Open-Door Policies in Psychiatry: Mixed Methods Study
The deliberate decision to forego locked doors fosters closer therapeutic relationships with severely ill patients and necessitates a high degree of creativity, vigilance, and professional commitment to de-escalate potentially volatile situations. Naturally, the successful application of such an approach is contingent upon adequate staffing levels and appropriate personnel resources [50].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73610
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Guidelines for Rapport-Building in Telehealth Videoconferencing: Interprofessional e-Delphi Study
Building upon previous descriptive studies [9,10,13,20,28-31], this project aimed to use an e-Delphi study to explore what relationship-based care elements are important to include in a telehealth curriculum. This will provide a strong foundation for the future curricula development of interprofessional students and clinicians across disciplines while closing a crucial gap in our practice and pedagogical knowledge.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e76260
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Participants were emailed a US $25 Amazon e-gift code.
Study procedure flowchart. GSR: galvanic skin response; HR: heart rate; HRV: heart rate variability.
The study was approved by the UCLA Institutional Review Board (#21‐000705), and the Clinical Trials.gov registry number was NCT0498465. Written informed consent was obtained. The privacy and confidentiality of research participants’ data and identity were maintained. Participants were compensated with US $25 Amazon gift cards.
JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e66557
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The participants received a US $25 e-gift card as compensation for completing the full survey. To prevent fraud, provided emails were compared to those on the mailing and membership lists, and data from unknown individuals were not included. In the case of duplicates, only the first completed survey was included in the analysis. Deidentified survey responses, with all personally identifiable information removed, are available for secondary data analysis.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e70813
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS