Search Results (1 to 10 of 1739 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 460 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 318 JMIR Research Protocols
- 187 JMIR Formative Research
- 152 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 78 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 70 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 67 JMIR Mental Health
- 59 JMIR Dermatology
- 55 JMIR Human Factors
- 54 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 28 JMIR Cancer
- 28 JMIR Medical Education
- 25 JMIR Aging
- 25 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 17 JMIR Cardio
- 16 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 13 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 13 JMIR Serious Games
- 12 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 12 JMIR Diabetes
- 11 Iproceedings
- 7 JMIR AI
- 7 JMIRx Med
- 7 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 6 JMIR Infodemiology
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 2 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)

With 24 participants, a significant intervention effect (P
Primary outcome data will be analyzed using a multilevel model (R, version 4.0+; package lme4) to investigate whether there is a significant difference between the level of professional care support moments (frequency or duration) per week in the baseline phase and the effect phase. The dependent continuous variable is the frequency and duration of professional care support moments per week.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e67841
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

However, a greater proportion of veterans with (compared to without) prevalent mental health conditions reported the following considerations to be “very important”: seeing information about DHTs on social media (those with mental health conditions: 42/428, 9.8%; those without mental health conditions: 19/328, 5.8%; χ22=6.2; P=.05); having community support through Veteran Service Organizations, churches, libraries, or other organizations to use DHTs (with: 56/427, 13.1%; without: 25/327, 7.6%; χ22=7.9; P=.02
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e77113
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

The initial model demonstrated good fit and accounted for 86% of the variability in Δ-STAI-S (multiple R=0.96; adjusted R2=0.86; ANOVA of regression: P
There was no significant change in systolic or diastolic BP among participants (Table 2). Pre- versus postexperience HR recordings demonstrated a statistically significant decreased mean HR of nearly 6 beats per minute.
JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e66557
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

With 47.3% adult population with hypertension in the United States in 2021 [29], using 5% type 1 error (P=.05), the minimum sample size required to estimate participation in RBPM was 383 participants [30]. A minimum of 500 sample size has been recommended for detecting differences between the sample estimates and the population in observational studies involving logistic regression [31]. We stopped recruitment as soon as possible when we reached a sample size of 500.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71926
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Capturing Community Perspectives in a Statewide Cancer Needs Assessment: Online Focus Group Study
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e63717
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Reach-Accept testing in the Chatbot arm was lower than in SMS text messaging (174/1051, 16.6% vs 555/1066, 52.1%; a RR 0.317, 98.33% CI 0.27‐0.38; P
Reach-Accept testing was higher among participants messaged every 10 days vs every 30 days (860/15,717, 5.5% vs 752/15,722, 4.8%; a RR 1.144, 97.5% CI 1.03‐1.28; P=.01; Table 2), and lower if the participants were offered access to PN compared with those in the no PN condition (680/15,718, 4.3% vs 932/15,721, 5.9%; a RR 0.729, 97.5% CI 0.65‐0.81; P
Out of 2117 participants
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e74145
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS