Search Results (1 to 10 of 184 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
CSV download: Download all 184 search results
(up to 5,000 articles maximum)
- 61 JMIR Research Protocols
- 36 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 19 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 17 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 12 JMIR Formative Research
- 10 JMIR Human Factors
- 6 JMIR Mental Health
- 5 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 4 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 3 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 2 JMIR Aging
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 2 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 Iproceedings
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Therefore, there is a need to create initiatives and partnerships that can enable this group to make informed decisions about their health and well-being.
In general, the development of DSTs and SDM training programs is guided by the decision-making needs of a targeted group [15]. Decision-making needs may be defined as factors that prevent people from making informed health care decisions.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e78618
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A comparison group will be included in the study. This group will be composed of all patients who undergo hip or knee replacement surgery in Iceland and who receive usual care during the same period as the intervention (eg, from approximately November 2024 to April 2025).
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e72317
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Group B scored higher than Group A, but the mean difference was not statistically significant (mean difference –0.69; P=.21). Similarly, Group C had nonsignificantly higher scores than Group A (mean difference –0.38; P=.49) and nonsignificantly lower scores than Group B (mean difference 0.31; P=.57). See Figure 4, Table S3 in Multimedia Appendix 7, Table S4 in Multimedia Appendix 8, and Figure S1 in Multimedia Appendix 9.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e70726
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Image A depicts group call discussions among physicians in personal protective equipment, while image B shows a medical technologist informing a physician of a critical potassium result via an individual call. Image C illustrates both individual and group call functionalities across disciplines, viewed from a medical technologist’s perspective during laboratory work.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67001
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The first stage is the preparatory phase, involving the formation of an expert group, collection of initial items, and discussion of these items. The second stage primarily includes 1 to 2 rounds of Delphi survey and online, face-to-face discussions, as well as multiple rounds of optimizing items. The third stage involves the publication of the checklist, as well as testing, dissemination, and promotion of the GAMER reporting guidelines.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e64640
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A technical advisory group (TAG)—comprising representatives from the Immunization Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, and the national AEFI committee (n=2), along with an interdisciplinary team of pediatricians (n=4), epidemiologists (n=4), statisticians (n=3), and pharmacovigilance experts (n=3)—provided technical guidance throughout all stages of project implementation.
We identified potential sites for inclusion in the network through a systematic, multistage process.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e64050
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The sample size calculation for the non-St UD group referred to a previous study that indicated a 0.23 probability for stimulant abstinence among non-St UD patients treated with a placebo and 0.17 for non-St UD patients treated without naltrexone [11]. A similar formula, accounting for type 1 error probability and 20% incomplete or missing data, was used for the calculation.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e64101
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The algorithm stratifies matches by blood group and balances the time spent waiting with the degree of donor-recipient matching nationally and by state of donor origin to generate a list of potential donor-recipient pairs in ranked order. In Australia, the time spent waiting is measured from initiation of dialysis to account for delays in reaching the active waiting list due to medical issues or delayed transplant suitability assessment and to ensure the sense of fairness prioritized by consumers [7,8].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e67588
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Lastly, to assess potential effect modifications of prespecified characteristics on new vaccination by target group, we included target group-by-covariate interactions in logistic models and estimated standardized prevalence ratios (SPR) within each target group. We tested for homogeneity using Wald tests.
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e60658
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS