Abstract
Background: Disturbed sleep patterns are common among older adults and may contribute to cognitive and physical declines. However, evidence for the relationship between sleep duration and cognitive frailty, a concept combining physical frailty and cognitive impairment in older adults, is lacking.
Objective: This study aimed to examine the associations of sleep duration and its changes with cognitive frailty.
Methods: We analyzed data from the 2008‐2018 waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. Cognitive frailty was rendered based on the modified Fried frailty phenotype and Mini-Mental State Examination. Sleep duration was categorized as short (<6 h), moderate (6‐9 h), and long (>9 h). We examined the association of sleep duration with cognitive frailty status at baseline using logistic regressions and with the future incidence of cognitive frailty using Cox proportional hazards models. Restricted cubic splines were used to explore potential nonlinear associations.
Results: Among 11,303 participants, 1298 (11.5%) had cognitive frailty at baseline. Compared to participants who had moderate sleep duration, the odds of having cognitive frailty were higher in those with long sleep duration (odds ratio 1.71, 95% CI 1.48‐1.97; P<.001). A J-shaped association between sleep duration and cognitive frailty was also observed (P<.001). Additionally, during a mean follow-up of 6.7 (SD 2.6) years among 5201 participants who were not cognitively frail at baseline, 521 (10%) participants developed cognitive frailty. A higher risk of cognitive frailty was observed in participants with long sleep duration (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.07‐1.62; P=.008).
Conclusions: Long sleep duration was associated with cognitive frailly in older Chinese adults. These findings provide insights into the relationship between sleep duration and cognitive frailty, with potential implications for public health policies and clinical practice.
doi:10.2196/65183
Keywords
Introduction
Physical frailty and cognitive impairment are prevalent among older adults and have individually been associated with adverse health outcomes [,]. They often coincide with aging and can be bidirectionally linked to each other [,], prompting the introduction of the concept of cognitive frailty—the coexistence of both physical frailty and cognitive impairment []. The necessity is further justified by the findings that cognitive frailty poses an even greater risk of adverse outcomes compared to the isolated effects of the 2 conditions [,]. Identifying factors associated with or contributing to cognitive frailty is important and will provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
Disturbed sleep patterns, such as an increased number of awakenings, abnormal nighttime sleep duration, and poorer sleep quality, are common among older adults []. Numerous epidemiological studies identified sleep disturbances as risk factors for physical frailty and cognitive impairment, such as shorter or longer sleep duration, insomnia, and sleep apnea [,]. In addition, recent studies have linked long sleep duration to cognitive frailty, but they are from cross-sectional analyses [,]. A longitudinal study in Mexican older adults reported associations between increasing sleep duration trajectory with greater odds for mild cognitive impairment and frailty separately []. Whether sleep patterns are associated with the development of cognitive frailty as a unified concept remains to be elucidated.
To address this knowledge gap, this study aimed to assess the associations of sleep duration with cognitive frailty in a nationally representative, large cohort of older Chinese adults. By focusing on an older Chinese adult population, our findings may offer insights into the relationship between sleep duration and cognitive frailty within this demographic, with potential implications for public health policies and clinical practice.
Methods
Study Design and Participants
We used data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). As detailed previously, CLHLS is an ongoing, nationwide representative longitudinal cohort study of Chinese adults aged 65 years and older from 23 out of 31 provinces or municipalities or autonomous regions in mainland China [,]. The CLHLS started in 1998 with surveys on sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, cognitive function, psychological status, and physical function conducted every 2‐3 years.
In this study, we used data from 4 waves (2008, 2011, 2014, and 2018) of the CLHLS. To maximize statistical power and leverage the large sample size, we first examined cross-sectional associations between sleep duration and sleep quality, with cognitive frailty at baseline (ie, the 2008 wave). For this set of analyses, we included 11,303 participants who had cognition and physical frailty assessments at baseline. We then examined whether baseline sleep duration and sleep quality, as well as change in sleep duration, were associated with the future development of cognitive frailty. For these longitudinal analyses, we excluded 1298 participants who had cognitive frailty at baseline, 4780 participants who had no follow-up cognitive frailty assessment, and 24 participants who had missing value in sleep duration in the 2011 wave. As a result, 5201 participants entered the subsequent longitudinal analysis.
Assessment of Cognitive Frailty
Cognitive frailty was identified as the simultaneous presence of both physical frailty and cognitive impairment [].
Physical frailty was assessed by a modified Fried frailty phenotype, based on 5 components: shrinking, weakness, low mobility, exhaustion, and inactivity [,]. Shrinking was defined as having a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 or less. Weakness was determined if participants self-reported that they were unable to lift a bag weighing 5 kg or above. Low mobility was identified if participants self-reported that they were unable to walk 1 km or longer in a row. Exhaustion was identified if participants answered “always,” “often,” or “sometimes” to the question “Do you feel the older you get, the more useless you are?” Inactivity was defined as participants doing the following activities 1 time per week or less: housework, outside activity, garden work, raising domestic animals or pets, playing cards or mah-jongg, and social activity (organized). Participants were considered physically frail when meeting ≥3 of the 5 criteria.
Cognitive impairment was assessed by a validated Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (C-MMSE) [,]. The C-MMSE includes 24 items regarding orientation, memory, attention, calculation, and language, ranging from 0 to 30. Based on a prior study, participants were considered cognitive impairment if the C-MMSE score was ≤22 [].
Assessment of Sleep Variables
Sleep duration was estimated based on the answers to the question “How many hours do you sleep normally?” Based on their answers, participants were further categorized into short (<6 h), moderate (6‐9 h), and long (>9 h) sleep durations. This categorization aligned with previous research indicating that both short and long sleep durations are associated with poorer health outcomes []. The rate of change in sleep duration was calculated by taking the difference between sleep durations reported in the 2008 and 2011 waves (ie, sleep duration in the 2011 wave minus sleep duration in the 2008 wave) and dividing it by the individual follow-up interval in years. Sleep quality was assessed based on answers to the question “How about the quality of your sleep?” A score of “poor” was assigned if the answer was “so-so,” “bad,” or “very bad,” and a score of “good” was assigned otherwise.
Covariates
We considered the following covariates that have been identified to be associated with physical or cognitive outcomes in previous studies [,]: age, sex, education, marital status, residence, economic status, loneliness, smoking status, drinking status, and multimorbidity. Education was categorized as “Not Educated” if the participant had not attended any schools and “With Formal Education” if the participant had attended schools more than 1 year. Marital status was defined as currently married and living with a spouse, and others (eg, separated, divorced, widowed, and never married). Residence was categorized into living in urban (eg, city or town) or rural areas. Economic status was categorized into economic dependence or independence based on their income source. Loneliness was identified if participants answered “always,” “often,” or “sometimes” to the question “Do you feel lonely and isolated?” Smoking status was categorized as “Never smoked,” and “Former or current smoker.” Drinking status was categorized into “Never drank,” and “Former or current drinker.” Multimorbidity was defined from self-reports and categorized as “Yes” if having 2 or more of the following chronic diseases: hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke or cerebrovascular disease, respiratory disease, cancer, and Parkinson disease, or “No” if otherwise.
Statistical Analysis
Listwise deletion was applied to both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to handle missing data on covariates. The t tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables were used to compare the differences in the baseline characteristics.
Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to assess the associations of sleep duration and sleep quality with cognitive frailty at baseline (ie, the 2008 wave). We performed 3 models: model A was unadjusted; model B was adjusted for age, sex, and education; model C was further adjusted for marital status, residence, economic status, loneliness, smoking status, drinking status, and multimorbidity.
Cox proportional hazard (PH) models were used to test the associations between sleep duration and sleep quality with incident cognitive frailty during the follow up. Death was treated as a right-censored event at the time of occurrence. The follow-up duration was defined as the time interval in years from baseline to the date of the first occurrence of cognitive frailty, death, or the latest available data, whichever occurred first. We rounded the time to the nearest integer year to account for group-tied events. Similarly, we performed 3 models: model A was unadjusted; model B was adjusted for age, sex, and education; model C was further adjusted for marital status, residence, economic status, loneliness, smoking status, drinking status, and multimorbidity. The PH assumption of the Cox models was assessed using Schoenfeld residuals. No major violations of the PH assumption were detected for exposure variables.
Restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves were plotted to explore the nonlinear cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between sleep duration and cognitive frailty. Additionally, several sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of our findings. First, we adjusted for each chronic disease individually and for all chronic diseases simultaneously. Second, we performed stratified analyses by sex and age. Furthermore, we performed similar sets of Cox PH models to investigate the associations of changes in sleep duration and incident cognitive frailty.
All statistical analyses were performed in R (version 4.1.2; R Core Team). Statistical significance was considered at a 2-tailed ɑ level of .05.
Ethical Considerations
The CLHLS was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board (Pro00062871) and the Peking University Biomedical Ethics Committee (IRB00001052–13074). All participants provided written informed consent. The data used in this study were deidentified to protect participant privacy and confidentiality. No compensation was provided to participants.
Results
Participant Characteristics
The participant flowchart is presented in 
Figure 1. Of the 11,303 participants included in the cross-sectional analysis, 6037 (53.4%) participants were female. The mean age at baseline was 84.7 (SD 11.0) years old. Approximately 11.5% (n=1298) of all participants had cognitive frailty at baseline. The numbers of participants who reported short, moderate, or long sleep duration were 1327 (11.7%), 7207 (63.8%), and 2769 (24.5%), respectively. Poor sleep quality was found in 3796 (33.6%) participants. Baseline characteristics stratified by cognitive frailty status at baseline are summarized in 
Table 1. Additionally, baseline characteristics categorized by sleep duration are presented in . Baseline characteristics of 5201 participants included in the longitudinal analysis are summarized in .
| Overall (n=11,303) | Non-CFa (n=10,005) | CF (n=1298) | P value | |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 84.7 (11.0) | 83.3 (10.6) | 95.3 (7.2) | <.001 |
| Sex, n (%) | <.001 | |||
| Male | 5266 (46.6) | 4966 (49.6) | 300 (23.1) | |
| Female | 6037 (53.4) | 5039 (50.4) | 998 (76.9) | |
| Education, n (%) | <.001 | |||
| Not educated | 6548 (57.9) | 5457 (54.5) | 1091 (84.1) | |
| With formal education | 4755 (42.1) | 4548 (45.5) | 207 (15.9) | |
| Marital status, n (%) | <.001 | |||
| Married and living with spouse | 4098 (36.3) | 3979 (39.8) | 119 (9.2) | |
| Others | 7205 (63.7) | 6026 (60.2) | 1179 (90.8) | |
| Current residence, n (%) | .12 | |||
| Urban | 4647 (41.1) | 4140 (41.4) | 507 (39.1) | |
| Rural | 6656 (58.9) | 5865 (58.6) | 791 (60.9) | |
| Economic status, n (%) | <.001 | |||
| Dependence | 7929 (70.2) | 6716 (67.1) | 1213 (93.5) | |
| Independence | 3374 (29.9) | 3289 (32.9) | 85 (6.5) | |
| Loneliness, n (%) | <.001 | |||
| Yes | 3581 (31.7) | 2943 (29.4) | 638 (49.2) | |
| No | 7722 (68.3) | 7062 (70.6) | 660 (50.8) | |
| Smoking status, n (%) | <.001 | |||
| Never smoked | 7271 (64.3) | 6230 (62.3) | 1041 (80.2) | |
| Former or current smoker | 4032 (35.7) | 3775 (37.7) | 257 (19.8) | |
| Drinking status, n (%) | <.001 | |||
| Never drank | 7670 (67.9) | 6665 (66.6) | 1005 (77.4) | |
| Former or current drinker | 3633 (32.1) | 3340 (33.4) | 293 (22.6) | |
| Multimorbidity, n (%) | .02 | |||
| Yes | 1068 (9.4) | 969 (9.7) | 99 (7.6) | |
| No | 10,235 (90.6) | 9036 (90.3) | 1199 (92.4) | |
| Sleep quality, n (%) | <.001 | |||
| Good | 7507 (66.4) | 6706 (67.0) | 801 (61.7) | |
| Poor | 3796 (33.6) | 3299 (33.0) | 497 (38.3) | |
| Sleep duration, n (%) | <.001 | |||
| Short (<6 h) | 1327 (11.7) | 1179 (11.8) | 148 (11.4) | |
| Moderate (6‐9 h) | 7207 (63.8) | 6557 (65.5) | 650 (50.1) | |
| Long (>9 h) | 2769 (24.5) | 2269 (22.7) | 500 (38.5) |
aCF: cognitive frailty.
Association Between Sleep Duration and Cognitive Frailty at Baseline
Compared to participants who had moderate sleep duration, the odds of having cognitive frailty were higher in those who had long sleep duration (odds ratio [OR] 1.71, 95% CI 1.48‐1.97; P<.001) in the initial model adjusted for age, sex, and education Table 2. The association remained statistically significant with a similar OR in the augmented model after further adjustments of marital status, residence, economic status, loneliness, smoking status, drinking status, and multimorbidity (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.46‐1.95; P<.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of having cognitive frailty between participants with short and modest sleep durations in the initial model adjusted for age, sex, and education. Compared with those who had a good sleep quality, participants who had a poor sleep quality were at a higher risk for cognitive frailty in both initial and the augmented models with further adjustments (initial model: OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.40‐1.89; P<.001; augmented model: OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21‐1.64; P<.001; Table 2). In addition, RCS analysis revealed a J-shaped association between sleep duration and cognitive frailty at baseline (P for nonlinear<.001; 
Figure 2).
The results of sensitivity analyses are summarized in and . The associations between long sleep duration and baseline cognitive frailty remained consistent when adjusting for each chronic disease individually and when accounting for all chronic diseases simultaneously (). For individuals younger than 80 years old, the association of long sleep duration with cognitive frailty became not statistically significant, whereas for individuals older than 80 years old, the association persisted. The association remained significant in sex-stratified models ().
| Model Aa | Model Bb | Model Cc | ||||
| ORd (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Age | —e | — | 1.12 (1.12‐1.13) | <.001 | 1.12 (1.11‐1.13) | <.001 |
| Sex (female) | — | — | 1.80 (1.54‐2.11) | <.001 | 1.56 (1.30‐1.87) | <.001 |
| Not educated | — | — | 1.78 (1.49‐2.13) | <.001 | 1.57 (1.31‐1.90) | <.001 |
| Married and living with spouse | — | — | — | — | 1.21 (0.97‐1.52) | .09 |
| Rural residence | — | — | — | — | 0.86 (0.75‐0.99) | .04 |
| Economic dependence | — | — | — | — | 2.24 (1.75‐2.89) | <.001 |
| Loneliness | — | — | — | — | 1.82 (1.60‐2.09) | <.001 |
| Smoker | — | — | — | — | 0.91 (0.76‐1.10) | .33 |
| Drinker | — | — | — | — | 1.03 (0.87‐1.22) | .73 |
| Multimorbidity | — | — | — | — | 1.47 (1.14‐1.87) | .002 |
| Poor sleep quality | 1.62 (1.41‐1.85) | <.001 | 1.63 (1.40‐1.89) | <.001 | 1.41 (1.21‐1.64) | <.001 |
| Sleep duration (hours) | ||||||
| Moderate (6‐9) | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| Short (<6) | 1.01 (0.82‐1.23) | .95 | 1.04 (0.83‐1.29) | .75 | 1.06 (0.85‐1.32) | .61 |
| Long (>9) | 2.47 (2.17-2.82) | <.001 | 1.71 (1.48‐1.97) | <.001 | 1.69 (1.46‐1.95) | <.001 |
aModel was unadjusted.
bModel was adjusted for age, sex, and education at baseline.
cModel was adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, residence, economic status, loneliness, smoking status, drinking status, and multimorbidity at baseline.
dOR: odds ratio.
eNot applicable.
Association Between Sleep Duration and Incident Cognitive Frailty During Follow-Up
Over a mean of 6.7 (SD 2.6) years of follow up, 521 (10%) participants out of the 5201 participants developed cognitive frailty. In the initial model adjusted for age, sex, and education, as compared with participants who had moderate sleep duration at baseline, a higher risk of cognitive frailty was observed in participants who had long sleep duration at baseline (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.07‐1.62; P=.008; Table 3). The association persisted after further adjusting for marital status, residence, economic status, loneliness, smoking status, drinking status, and multimorbidity (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06‐1.59; P=.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the hazard of incident cognitive frailty between participants with short sleep duration and moderate sleep duration in the initial model. Besides, there was no significant difference in the risk of incident cognitive frailty between participants with good and poor sleep quality. Additionally, RCS analysis showed no significant nonlinear association between sleep duration and cognitive frailty during follow up (P for nonlinear=.29; 
Figure 3).
| Model Aa | Model Bb | Model Cc | ||||
| HRd (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Age | —e | — | 1.09 (1.08‐1.10) | <.001 | 1.09 (1.08‐1.10) | <.001 |
| Sex (female) | — | — | 1.98 (1.60‐2.45) | <.001 | 1.61 (1.25‐2.08) | <.001 |
| Not educated | — | — | 1.84 (1.47‐2.31) | <.001 | 1.72 (1.36‐2.17) | <.001 |
| Married and living with spouse | — | — | — | — | 1.27 (1.01‐1.59) | .04 |
| Rural residence | — | — | — | — | 1.03 (0.86‐1.24) | .74 |
| Economic dependence | — | — | — | — | 1.47 (1.14‐1.91) | .003 |
| Loneliness | — | — | — | — | 1.22 (1.01‐1.47) | .04 |
| Smoker | — | — | — | — | 1.02 (0.80‐1.30) | .85 |
| Drinker | — | — | — | — | 0.77 (0.61‐0.97) | .03 |
| Multimorbidity | — | — | — | — | 1.33 (0.96‐1.83) | .08 |
| Poor sleep quality | 1.32 (1.08‐1.60) | .006 | 1.22 (1.00‐1.49) | .05 | 1.14 (0.93‐1.39) | .22 |
| Sleep duration (hours) | ||||||
| Moderate (6‐9) | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| Short (<6) | 0.96 (0.72‐1.27) | .76 | 0.90 (0.68‐1.21) | .49 | 0.94 (0.70‐1.25) | .66 |
| Long (>9) | 1.74 (1.42‐2.14) | <.001 | 1.32 (1.07‐1.62) | .008 | 1.30 (1.06‐1.59) | .01 |
aModel was unadjusted.
bModel was adjusted for age, sex, and education at baseline.
cModel was adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, residence, economic status, loneliness, smoking status, drinking status and multimorbidity at baseline.
dHR: hazard ratio.
eNot applicable.
The results of sensitivity analyses are summarized in and . The associations between long sleep duration and baseline cognitive frailty status were consistent when adjusting for each chronic disease individually, or when adjusting for all chronic diseases simultaneously (). For individuals younger than 80 years old, the association of long sleep duration with cognitive frailty became not statistically significant, whereas for individuals older than 80 years old, the association persisted. The association was not significant in male participants but remained statistically significant in female participants ().
Rate of Change in Sleep Duration and Cognitive Frailty
The mean annual rate of change in sleep duration was –0.02 (SD 0.87) hours/year. In the model adjusted for age, sex, education, sleep quality, and sleep duration at baseline, a faster increase in sleep duration per year was associated with a higher risk for cognitive frailty: for 1 hour/year increase in sleep duration, the HR was 1.14 (95% CI 1.03‐1.27; P=.01). The association remained significant after further adjusting for marital status, residence, economic status, loneliness, smoking status, drinking status, and multimorbidity (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03‐1.27; P=.01; ).
Discussion
Principal Findings
In this large community-based prospective study of over 10,000 Chinese older adults, we found that long sleep duration was consistently associated with cognitive frailty status at baseline, as well as an increased risk of cognitive frailty incident during follow up. We also found that a faster annual increase in sleep duration was associated with a higher risk of cognitive frailty during follow up.
The associations of sleep duration with physical frailty or cognitive decline are complex with mixed findings in prior research. A study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey demonstrated that prolonged sleep duration (ie, ≥10 h) was associated with physical frailty in older adults, while a prospective study of 309 older Mexican adults showed that participants with either short sleep duration (ie, ≤5 h) or long sleep duration (ie, ≥9 h) had a higher risk of physical frailty [,]. Likewise, a Japanese cohort study of 623 older adults reported that long sleepers (>8 h) had a higher risk of cognitive impairment, while a cohort study found that self-reported short sleepers (<7 h) had an increased risk of cognitive decline [,]. However, few studies explored the association between sleep duration and cognitive frailty, that is, the coexistence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment. Two recent cross-sectional studies reported an association of long sleep duration with cognitive frailty among community-dwelling older adults and in older adults with heart failure [,]. In this study, we confirmed such a cross-sectional association between long sleep duration and cognitive frailty. More intriguingly, we showed consistent evidence from longitudinal analyses that participants with long sleep duration at baseline had an increased risk of developing cognitive frailty in the future. Of note, we did not find a significant association between short sleep duration and cognitive frailty in this study.
We also used the annual rate of change in sleep duration to assess the relationship between sleep duration changes and cognitive frailty. The results showed that a faster annual increase in sleep duration was associated with a higher risk of cognitive frailty, independent of the baseline sleep duration category. Notably, this study accounted for variations in follow-up years by using the annual rate of sleep duration change instead of the absolute change in sleep duration, minimizing classification bias and providing a more accurate representation of the relationship between sleep duration trajectories and cognitive frailty.
The mechanisms underlying the association of sleep duration with incident cognitive frailty remain unclear. However, several potential pathways can be suggested. First, inappropriate sleep duration (either shorter or longer than ideal) has been linked to cardiovascular health [], which has been reported as a risk factor for both physical frailty and cognitive decline [,]. Second, increased sleep duration has also been linked with elevations in C-reactive protein, a marker for systemic inflammation, and interleukin-6, a proinflammatory biomarker [,]. Prior studies have shown that even low-level inflammation may pose an increased risk for the development of physical frailty and cognitive impairment [,]. Finally, long sleep duration may also be an indicator of or linked to disturbances in circadian control, the internal biological clock that prepares bodily responses to environmental light-dark changes. Circadian disturbances have been previously reported to be associated with both physical frailty and cognitive impairment or decline [-].
Several previous studies showed that sleep quality is closely related to impairments in both physical and cognitive domains [,]. In addition, 2 recent cross-sectional studies reported that poor sleep quality was associated with cognitive frailty in older Chinese adults living in nursing homes, and among Thai community-dwelling older adults during the COVID-19 restrictions [,]. Our observed cross-sectional association between sleep quality and cognitive frailty aligns with these previous findings. However, we did not find evidence of an association between sleep quality and the development of cognitive frailty in this study. It is important to note that the assessment of sleep quality in this study relied on a single question, which may be overly simplistic and may not fully capture the complexity of sleep behaviors. Future studies should use more comprehensive approaches to assess sleep health, considering its multidimensional nature, which includes factors such as duration, timing, efficiency, satisfaction, and alertness [].
Strengths and Limitations
To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first to assess the association between sleep duration and incident cognitive frailty in a nationally representative sample of older Chinese adults. Strengths of this study include its longitudinal design and a large sample size. This study also has several limitations. First, the sleep duration and sleep quality were from self-reports and may be subjected to recall biases, especially in older adults and individuals with cognitive impairment. Future studies, ideally with an objective sleep monitoring approach (such as combining actigraphy and sleep diary or polysomnography), are warranted. Second, a growing body of studies have linked daytime napping behaviors with physical frailty, cognitive decline, Alzheimer dementia, or cognitive frailty [,,]. Similarly, sleep disorders, such as sleep apnea, have been consistently linked with physical frailty, cognitive impairment, and dementia [,]. However, these potential sleep-related influences were not collected in the CLHLS. Future studies may consider incorporating these multidimensional structs when assessing sleep health and its relationships with physical and cognitive outcomes. Finally, the participants in this study were, on average, older than 80 years at baseline. In subgroup analyses, the association between long sleep duration and cognitive frailty was not statistically significant in participants younger than 80 years. This may be due to the limited number of cognitive frailty events in this subgroup, which could have resulted in insufficient statistical power to detect a significant association. Therefore, caution should be taken when translating our findings into younger populations.
Conclusions
In this large cohort study of over 10,000 older Chinese adults, long sleep duration was consistently associated with an increased risk of cognitive frailty, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. These findings underscore the importance of sleep monitoring in aging populations. Future research using objective sleep assessments and investigating the underlying biological mechanisms is warranted to inform more effective prevention strategies.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the Key Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (2022SJZD141 to JC) and the BrightFocus Foundation Alzheimer’s Research Program (A2020886S to PL). PL is additionally supported by the Funds to Sustain Research Excellence from the Brigham Research Institute and a start-up fund from the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital. CG is additionally supported by Alzheimer’s Association (AARFD-22‐928372). KH is additionally supported by the National Institute on Aging (RF1AG064312; R01AG083799) and a start-up fund from the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital. LG is additionally supported by the Alzheimer’s Association (AACSF-23‐1148490).
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Multimedia Appendix 1
Baseline characteristics of participants by sleep duration groups
DOCX File, 20 KBMultimedia Appendix 2
Baseline characteristics of participants by incident cognitive frailty status during follow-up.
DOCX File, 20 KBMultimedia Appendix 3
Association between sleep and cognitive frailty at baseline with individual chronic disease adjustments.
DOCX File, 19 KBMultimedia Appendix 4
Association between sleep and baseline cognitive frailty stratified by age and sex.
DOCX File, 19 KBMultimedia Appendix 5
Association between sleep and incident cognitive frailty with individual chronic disease adjustments.
DOCX File, 19 KBMultimedia Appendix 6
Association between sleep and incident cognitive frailty stratified by age and sex.
DOCX File, 19 KBReferences
- Bae JB, Han JW, Kwak KP, et al. Impact of mild cognitive impairment on mortality and cause of death in the elderly. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(2):607-616. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. Mar 2, 2013;381(9868):752-762. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Boyle PA, Buchman AS, Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA. Physical frailty is associated with incident mild cognitive impairment in community-based older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. Feb 2010;58(2):248-255. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Nontraditional risk factors combine to predict Alzheimer disease and dementia. Neurology (ECronicon). Jul 19, 2011;77(3):227-234. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kelaiditi E, Cesari M, Canevelli M, et al. Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) International Consensus Group. J Nutr Health Aging. Nov 2013;17(9):726-734. [CrossRef]
- Feng L, Nyunt MSZ, Gao Q, et al. Physical frailty, cognitive impairment, and the risk of neurocognitive disorder in the Singapore longitudinal ageing studies. GERONA. Mar 24, 2016:glw050. [CrossRef]
- Solfrizzi V, Scafato E, Lozupone M, et al. Additive role of a potentially reversible cognitive frailty model and inflammatory state on the risk of disability: the Italian longitudinal study on aging. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. Nov 2017;25(11):1236-1248. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Li J, Vitiello MV, Gooneratne NS. Sleep in normal aging. Sleep Med Clin. Mar 2018;13(1):1-11. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bubu OM, Brannick M, Mortimer J, et al. Sleep, cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep. Jan 1, 2017;40(1). [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sun R, Xie Y, Jiang W, Wang E, Li X. Effects of different sleep disorders on frailty in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Sleep Breath. Mar 2023;27(1):91-101. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zhao Y, Lu Y, Zhao W, et al. Long sleep duration is associated with cognitive frailty among older community-dwelling adults: results from West China Health and Aging Trend study. BMC Geriatr. Oct 27, 2021;21(1):608. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Seo EJ, Son YJ. The prevalence of cognitive frailty and its association with sleep duration and depression among older adults with heart failure. Clin Gerontol. 2024;47(3):416-425. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Salinas-Rodríguez A, Manrique-Espinoza B, Moreno-Tamayo K, Guerrero-Zúñiga S. Trajectories of sleep duration and quality and their association with mild cognitive impairment, frailty, and all-cause mortality. Sleep Health. Apr 2024;10(2):240-248. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zeng Y. Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey and some research findings. Geriatrics Gerontol Int. Sep 2004;4(s1). [CrossRef]
- Zeng Y, Feng Q, Hesketh T, Christensen K, Vaupel JW. Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study. Lancet. Apr 2017;389(10079):1619-1629. [CrossRef]
- Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. Mar 2001;56(3):M146-M156. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wang HY, Lv X, Du J, Kong G, Zhang L. Age- and gender-specific prevalence of frailty and its outcomes in the longevous population: the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:719806. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Yi Z, Vaupel JW. Functional capacity and self–evaluation of health and life of oldest old in China. J Soc Issues. Jan 2002;58(4):733-748. [CrossRef]
- Li J, Cao D, Huang Y, et al. Sleep duration and health outcomes: an umbrella review. Sleep Breath. Sep 2022;26(3):1479-1501. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Vatanabe IP, Pedroso RV, Teles RHG, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on cognitive frailty in community-dwelling older adults: risk and associated factors. Aging Ment Health. Mar 4, 2022;26(3):464-476. [CrossRef]
- Yuan C, Zhang Y. Modifiable risk factors of cognitive frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Knowl. Apr 2024;35(2):177-185. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Baniak LM, Yang K, Choi J, Chasens ER. Long sleep duration is associated with increased frailty risk in older community-dwelling adults. J Aging Health. 2020;32(1):42-51. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Moreno-Tamayo K, Manrique-Espinoza B, Morales-Carmona E, Salinas-Rodríguez A. Sleep duration and incident frailty: the rural frailty study. BMC Geriatr. Jun 16, 2021;21(1):368. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Keil SA, Schindler AG, Wang MX, et al. Longitudinal sleep patterns and cognitive impairment in older adults. JAMA Netw Open. Dec 1, 2023;6(12):e2346006. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kinoshita K, Otsuka R, Takada M, et al. Dietary amino acid intake and sleep duration are additively involved in future cognitive decline in Japanese adults aged 60 years or over: a community-based longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr. Oct 11, 2023;23(1):653. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lloyd-Jones DM, Allen NB, Anderson CAM, et al. Life’s essential 8: updating and enhancing the American Heart Association’s construct of cardiovascular health: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Aug 2, 2022;146(5):e18-e43. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Palta P, Griswold M, Ranadive R, et al. Midlife cardiovascular health and robust versus frail late-life status: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. Jun 1, 2022;77(6):1222-1229. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Cho S, Yang PS, Kim D, et al. Association of cardiovascular health with the risk of dementia in older adults. Sci Rep. Sep 19, 2022;12(1):15673. [CrossRef]
- Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Carroll JE. Sleep disturbance, sleep duration, and inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and experimental sleep deprivation. Biol Psychiatry. Jul 1, 2016;80(1):40-52. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Patel SR, Zhu X, Storfer-Isser A, et al. Sleep duration and biomarkers of inflammation. Sleep. Feb 2009;32(2):200-204. [CrossRef]
- Singh-Manoux A, Dugravot A, Brunner E, et al. Interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein as predictors of cognitive decline in late midlife. Neurology (ECronicon). Aug 5, 2014;83(6):486-493. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wang J, Maxwell CA, Yu F. Biological processes and biomarkers related to frailty in older adults: a state-of-the-science literature review. Biol Res Nurs. Jan 2019;21(1):80-106. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Cai R, Gao L, Gao C, et al. Circadian disturbances and frailty risk in older adults. Nat Commun. Nov 16, 2023;14(1):7219. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Gao L, Li P, Gaykova N, et al. Circadian rest-activity rhythms, delirium risk, and progression to dementia. Ann Neurol. Jun 2023;93(6):1145-1157. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Li P, Gao L, Gaba A, et al. Circadian disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease progression: a prospective observational cohort study of community-based older adults. Lancet Healthy Longevity. Dec 2020;1(3):e96-e105. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Li P, Hu K. Circadian disturbances and age-related disorders. Adv Biol (Weinh). Nov 2023;7(11):e2300405. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Gildner TE, Liebert MA, Kowal P, Chatterji S, Snodgrass JJ. Associations between sleep duration, sleep quality, and cognitive test performance among older adults from six middle income countries: results from the Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE). J Clin Sleep Med. Jun 15, 2014;10(6):613-621. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wai JT, Yu DF. The relationship between sleep-wake disturbances and frailty among older adults: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. Jan 2020;76(1):96-108. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Griffiths J, Seesen M, Sirikul W, Siviroj P. Malnutrition, depression, poor sleep quality, and difficulty falling asleep at night are associated with a higher risk of cognitive frailty in older adults during the COVID-19 restrictions. Nutrients. Jun 23, 2023;15(13):2849. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Liu S, Hu Z, Guo Y, Zhou F, Li S, Xu H. Association of sleep quality and nap duration with cognitive frailty among older adults living in nursing homes. Front Public Health. Aug 25, 2022;10:963105. [CrossRef]
- Buysse DJ. Sleep health: can we define it? Does it matter? Sleep. Jan 1, 2014;37(1):9-17. [CrossRef]
- Li P, Gao L, Yu L, et al. Daytime napping and Alzheimer’s dementia: a potential bidirectional relationship. Alzheimers Dement. Jan 2023;19(1):158-168. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zhang Y, Zhou L, Ge M, Lin X, Dong B. Association between daytime nap duration and risks of frailty: findings from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1098609. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bubu OM, Andrade AG, Umasabor-Bubu OQ, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea, cognition and Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review integrating three decades of multidisciplinary research. Sleep Med Rev. Apr 2020;50:101250. [CrossRef] [Medline]
Abbreviations
| C-MMSE: Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination |
| CLHLS: Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey |
| HR: hazard ratio |
| OR: odds ratio |
| PH: proportional hazard |
| RCS: restricted cubic spline |
Edited by Frank Puga; submitted 13.08.24; peer-reviewed by I-Chien Wu, Wei-Qi Song; final revised version received 10.03.25; accepted 20.03.25; published 23.04.25.
Copyright© Ruixue Cai, Jianqian Chao, Chenlu Gao, Lei Gao, Kun Hu, Peng Li. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 23.4.2025.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.