Background: Adults and older adults are recommended to engage in 150 minutes of moderate (MPA) to vigorous (VPA) aerobic physical activity (MVPA) per week, with the heuristic message of 3000 steps in 30 minutes (100 steps per minute [spm]). However, this message is based on adult populations, with a paucity of research on step-rate thresholds that correspond to absolute MVPA (moderate=3 metabolic equivalents [METs], vigorous=6 METs) and relative MVPA (moderate=40% estimated METmax, vigorous=60% estimated METmax) in older persons, who have lower stride lengths and a lower exercise capacity. Also, there is a need to consider the influence of anthropometric differences when quantifying the relationship between step rate and intensity-related physical activity.
Objective: This study assessed absolute and relative MVPA step-rate thresholds and anthropometric factors (ie, height, leg length, and body mass index [BMI]) in older adults.
Methods: Nineteen older adults (7 females; age 69 years, SD 2, BMI 26 kg/m2, SD 4) completed a staged treadmill walking protocol: six minutes at 2.4, 3.2, 4.0, 5.6, and 6.4 km/h. Steps were manually counted and volume rate of oxygen consumed (VO2) was measured via indirect calorimetry. Aerobic fitness was estimated via the submaximal single-stage treadmill protocol.
Results: When BMI was considered, mixed effects modeling revealed absolute and relative MPA step-rate thresholds of 108 spm and 117 spm, respectively. Absolute and relative VPA corresponded to step rates of 135 spm and 132 spm, respectively. Neither height nor leg length improved the ability of the model to predict stepping cadence from METs.
Conclusions: In general, older adults need to walk faster than 100 spm (ie, approximately 110 spm) to reach MPA and in excess of approximately 130 spm to achieve VPA, depending on BMI status. Health care professionals and researchers should adjust cadence-based recommendations for differences in BMI in their older patients and consider using relative intensity to most appropriately tailor their physical activity recommendations.
Leading a physically active lifestyle is associated with numerous health benefits among older adults that include improved cardiovascular and metabolic health and a reduction in all-cause mortality [- ]. When objectively measured, only 12% of Canadian older persons achieve the national physical activity guidelines that recommend 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic physical activity (MVPA) per week [ ]. Older adults report walking as the most common form of physical activity [ ], with research showing that MVPA is attainable in this population [ ].
Initially, 3000 steps in 30 minutes (or 100 steps per minute [spm]) has been proposed as a heuristic cadence-based recommendation to achieve moderate-intensity physical activity (MPA) (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) in adults . More recent studies have validated this public message [ - ]; however, most research has been conducted in samples of young adults with few studies investigating this relationship in older adults [ , ]. Older adults experience physiological and biomechanical changes that decrease their exercise capacity and stride length [ , ]. These age-related processes limit the generalizability of cadence-based MVPA thresholds that are based on young adult samples.
Many studies have quantified MVPA in terms of absolute intensity, where MPA and vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA) are defined as 3 METs and 6 METs, respectively. However, the Canadian Society of Exercise Physiology (CSEP)  and American College of Sport Medicine [ ] recommend using individualized intensities for exercise prescription, where MPA is 40% of maximal aerobic fitness (VO2max) and VPA is 60% of VO2max. Relative metabolic intensities may have greater applicability to older adults who, on average, are less aerobically fit and benefit from individualized exercise prescriptions [ - ].
As highlighted in a recent narrative review on the topic , there are only two studies that have examined MPA step-rate thresholds in older populations, and they report conflicting findings. Serrano et al [ ] observed that 40% VO2reserve (mean 3.3 METs, SD 0.8) was associated with approximately 115 spm and that body weight and self-selected walking cadence best predicted (R2=0.34) the cadence required to reach relative MPA. However, Peacock et al [ ] observed that absolute MPA step-rate thresholds were lower in older adults than their previously published sample of young adults [ ] when matched for height (at 170 cm: young=104 spm; older=91 spm) and that METs were best predicted (R2=0.50) when step rate, height, and age were predictor variables. Interestingly, both studies analyze the cadence–intensity relationship using linear methods, whereas this relationship has been shown to be curvilinear [ , , - ]. Despite the inconsistency in the existing literature, both studies clearly demonstrate that anthropometrics (ie, height or body weight) alter MVPA step-rate thresholds in that shorter and/or lighter individuals generally need to take more steps to reach the same intensity as their taller and/or heavier counterparts.
Given the disagreement in the current literature regarding appropriate MPA step cadences for older persons as well as the lack of consideration for VPA, there is a need to investigate step-rate recommendations for both absolute and relative MPA and VPA in an aged population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to use mathematical modeling with anthropometric factors as predictor variables to calculate older adults’ individualized step rate. Using these models, we will determine step-rate thresholds that define both absolute and relative MPA and VPA in our sample of older adults.
Nineteen older adults (7 females) aged mean 68.8 (SD 2.3; 65-74) years volunteered to participate in this study. All participants were initially screened for age (over 65 years) and cleared for MVPA using the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire Plus (PAR-Q+) . All participants completed a CSEP Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (PASB-Q), a valid and reliable measure of weekly MVPA [ ]. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at Acadia University (REB#15-20), and all subjects provided written informed consent before participating. All participants were recruited via a community-wide email and by word of mouth in Wolfville, Nova Scotia, from May 2015 to September 2015.
Height and weight were measured without shoes using a calibrated stadiometer and scale (Health-O-Meter, Sunbeam Products Inc) to the nearest 0.5 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively. Leg length was measured with participants in the seated position using a tape measure (cm) as the distance from the greater trochanter to the floor without footwear.
Aerobic fitness was estimated using the validated Ebbeling walking treadmill protocol . The Ebbeling consists of two 4-minute walking stages. The first stage is designed to reach a speed that elicits approximately 60% of the participants’ estimated heart rate maximum (ie, 220–age), and the second stage involves increasing the treadmill grade by 5%. Treadmill speed and steady-state heart rate are used to estimate VO2max [ ]. A submaximal test was chosen over a maximal test for safety reasons and to minimally influence the subsequent walking assessment. Furthermore, the time frame of this particular test (8 minutes) corresponds to the time restraints experienced by qualified exercise professionals to counsel, assess patients’ physical fitness, and produce an optimal exercise program. Following the submaximal aerobic test, a resting period of 20 to 30 minutes was allotted to ensure participants returned to a rested state.
The study design and protocol were adapted from our previous investigation in young adults . Prior to testing, the metabolic cart (TrueOne 2400, Parvo Medics) was calibrated using nitrogen and 2 primary standard gas mixtures to an error of 0.01%. The pneumotachometer was calibrated using a 3-L syringe that delivered fixed volumes at different flow rates. Volume calibration was verified to a value less than 0.1 L. Heart rate was monitored using a telemetry transmitter attached across the sternum (T31, Polar Electro). Participants were familiarized with the Borg scale and asked to estimate their rating of perceived exertion (RPE) on a scale of 6 to 20 [ ]. Participants were fitted with a headpiece, a 2-way nonrebreathing valve (Hans-Rudolph Inc), a noseclip, and a mouthpiece.
Participants performed up to five 6-minute walking bouts on a calibrated, level treadmill at 2.4, 3.2, 4.0, 5.6, and 6.4 km/h (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.0 mph, respectively). Each bout was separated by a 4-minute standing rest period to ensure minimal drift of metabolism between stages. The order of treadmill bouts was progressive because of concerns that some participants would be unable to walk at the higher speeds due to limitations in fitness. Considering the relationship between step rate and metabolic activity is likely altered at jogging and running paces in comparison to walking, only walking was permitted.
Steps were manually counted by two researchers during minutes 2 to 3 and 4 to 5 of each stage in order to obtain the gold standard step counts per minute for each stage. A video camera filmed the feet of the participant in case the researchers recorded greater than 1 step difference during a stage. The steps counted during minutes 2 to 3 and 4 to 5 of each stage were averaged and multiplied by a factor of 6 to determine the number of steps for each 6-minute stage. Of relevance, the steps counted during minutes 2 to 3 and 4 to 5 were always within 2 spm. The test was terminated by completing the protocol of all 5 stages, volitional fatigue, or if the participant reached 85% of their estimated heart rate maximum or RPE was greater than 17 . An appropriate cooldown was administered by the researcher while monitoring the participant’s heart rate recovery.
Steady-state volume rate of oxygen consumed (VO2) for each 6-minute walking bout was obtained using indirect calorimetry, where steady state was defined as a heart rate change of less than 5 beats per minute, consistent with previous research . VO2 and heart rate data were recorded at 15-second intervals for the duration of the protocol. Steady-state VO2 for each participant was recorded as an average of the last 4 minutes of each bout to limit the variability introduced by oxygen kinetics at the onset of each protocol stage.
Data and Statistical Analysis
Statistics were completed in R version 3.4.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and SPSS Statistics for Mac version 23.0 (IBM Corp). Descriptive statistics are presented in the text as mean and standard deviation or proportion (%). Statistical significance was accepted as P<.05.
Participants’ relative estimated VO2max was divided by 3.5 mL/kg/min to calculate their maximum METs. For absolute intensity, MPA and VPA were classified as 3.00 to 5.99 METs and >6.00 METs, respectively. For relative intensity, MPA and VPA were classified as 40% to 59% METmax and >60% METmax, respectively. For each stage, METs were calculated by dividing steady-state VO2 by 3.5 mL/kg/min. Stepping rate was computed as the average between manually counted steps during minutes 2 to 3 and 4 to 5 of each stage. Step length (meters per step) was determined by dividing treadmill speed (meters per minute) by step rate.
Multiple regression, mixed effects models, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to differentiate step-rate cut points for both MPA and VPA. The multiple regression approach was used to develop an equation that predicts step rate using metabolic activity and a combination of body mass index (BMI), height, and/or leg length, consistent with previous research [, ]. However, multiple data points from each individual were used in the current analysis, thus violating the assumption of data independence. Therefore, mixed effects modeling was used to overcome this limitation by incorporating random intercepts to account for the data-dependence structure. ROC curves were used to evaluate optimal step-rate cut points that resulted in the highest sensitivity (true positives) and specificity (true negatives) for intensity-related physical activity as derived via Youden’s index. For ROC area under the curve (AUC) analysis, below 0.70 was considered poor, 0.70 to 0.80 considered fair, 0.80 to 0.90 considered good, and 0.90 to 1.00 considered excellent [ ].
Subject-level plots of step rates as a function of METs indicated that the relationship between these variables was curvilinear. The model presented by Beets and colleagues , which used METs, METs2, BMI, leg length, and BMI×METs as predictors of step rate, was used as the starting model. Parameters were added or removed (eg, height, body weight, METs3) according to relative goodness of fit and model complexity and based on a priori knowledge regarding the relationship among the variables of interest and the objective of this study. Of the candidate models, relative Akaike information criterion (AIC) scores (a model comparison measure) were used to determine which among them were most probable to minimize the information loss (ie, which model was closer to the true model or the data-generating model). AIC comparisons were used to identify which models are best at trading off bias versus variance among the fitted model parameters [ ]. As such, AIC comparisons were used to identify which models were expected to maximize predictive accuracy. Model diagnostics were run for the best mixed model for each height, body weight, BMI, and/or leg length as predictors. The inclusion of height, leg length, or body weight as predictor variables did not improve the predictive capabilities of the model, whereas BMI alone drastically increased the ability of model to predict step rates from metabolic activity. Assumptions of normality, homoscedasticity, and independence were assessed via residual plots. The relationship among predictors was assessed via scatter plots.
On average, participants self-reported 234 (SD 157) minutes of MVPA per week. Most participants (13/19) reported at least one yes to a question on the PAR-Q+. The mean (SD; range) values of leg length, height, and BMI were 96.2 (SD 7.6; 82-108) cm, 169.8 (SD 7.3; 160-187) cm, 26.3 (SD 3.5; 20.6-31.2) kg/m2, respectively, with participants being classified as healthy BMI (18.6-24.9 kg/m2; 6/19) overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2; 9/19), or obese class one (30.0-34.9 kg/m2; 4/19). Median values for leg length, height, and BMI were 95.0 cm, 168 cm, and 26.2 kg/m2, respectively. The average estimated VO2max of the sample was 31.0 ml/kg/min (SD 2.9; 25.7-35.7). Participants were classified as fair (7/19), good (7/19) or very good (5/19).
As demonstrated in, all outcome variables progressively increased with faster walking speeds. Subject relative moderate METs and relative vigorous METs were 3.5 (SD 0.3) METs (median 3.5 METs) and 5.3 (SD 0.5) METs (median 5.3 METs), respectively.
The multiple regression model generated to predict MVPA step rates from METs and BMI is presented in. Step rates were accurately predicted when BMI was a predictor variable (R2=0.774; P<.001). Predicted absolute and relative intensity-related physical activity step-rate thresholds using the median values for BMI (26.2 kg/m2) are presented in .
|Stage (speed)||Value, n||Step rate (spma), mean (SD)||METsb, mean (SD)||VO2c (mL/kg/min), mean (SD)||Step length (meters), mean (SD)||Heart rate (bpmd), mean (SD)||RPEe (6-20), mean (SD)|
|Stage 1 (2.4 km/h)||19||91 (9)||2.4 (0.2)||8.4 (0.8)||0.45 (0.05)||83 (10)||8.5 (1.0)|
|Stage 2 (3.2 km/h)||19||104 (8)||2.7 (0.3)||9.5 (0.9)||0.52 (0.04)||85 (11)||9.5 (1.1)|
|Stage 3 (4.0 km/h)||19||110 (7)||3.1 (0.2)||10.7 (0.8)||0.61 (0.04)||88 (11)||10.7 (1.5)|
|Stage 4 (5.6 km/h)||18||125 (6)||4.4 (0.5)||15.2 (1.9)||0.75 (0.03)||105 (12)||12.2 (1.8)|
|Stage 5 (6.4 km/h)||14||133 (6)||5.7 (0.6)||19.9 (2.0)||0.81 (0.04)||117 (11)||13.5 (2.4)|
aspm: steps per minute.
bMETs: metabolic equivalents.
cVO2: volume rate of oxygen consumed (mL/kg/min).
dbpm: beats per minute.
eRPE: rating of perceived exertion (6-20).
|Analysis||Model||Adjusted R2 (P value)|
|Multiple regression||–50.768 + (71.707×METsa) – (9.650×METs2) + (0.543×METs3) + (1.775×BMIb) – (0.394×BMI×METs)||0.774 (<.001)|
|Mixed methodsc||–84.321 + (91.209×METs) – (12.968×METs2) + (0.772×METs3) + (2.211×BMI) – (0.549×BMI×METs)||—d|
aMETs: metabolic equivalents.
bBMI: body mass index (kg/m2).
cRecommended model to predict step rate.
dAn R2 value is presented for the multiple regression but not the mixed method model.
|Analysis||Intensity-related physical activity step rates|
|Absolute MPAa (3 METsb)||Absolute VPAc (6 METs)||Relative MPA (40% METmaxd)||Relative VPA (60% METmax)|
aMPA: moderate-intensity physical activity.
bMETs: metabolic equivalents.
cVPA: vigorous-intensity physical activity.
dMETmax: estimated VO2max divided by 3.5 mL/kg/min.
eROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Mixed Effects Modeling
Similar to previous research , intercepts were allowed to vary among participants (ie, random intercept modeling was used). Regardless of intensity, the mixed effects model yielded similar step rates compared to the multiple regression model when BMI was used as a predictor (see ). demonstrates the curvilinear relationship between step rate and metabolic activity with the mixed effects model as the reference line (median BMI 26.2 kg/m2). The influence of BMI on the relationship between step rate and metabolic activity is further presented in . Due the interaction effect between BMI and METs, a greater BMI was associated with faster step rates at 3 METs but with slower step rates at higher METs (ie, 5 METs and 6 METs). Likewise, the positive BMI coefficient (2.111×BMI) and the negative BMI*MET interaction (–0.549×BMI×METs) cancel out at 4 METs, resulting in no influence of BMI on step-rate thresholds at this intensity (see ).
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves
Data used for absolute MVPA and relative MVPA calculations were dependent upon the average MET values for the respective walking stages. The absolute MPA (3 METs) ROC curve was generated based on stages 1 to 3 (mean ranging from 2.4 to 3.1 METs). The optimal step rate was 104.3 spm, with 83.3% correctly classified as achieving MPA and 71.1% correctly classified as not achieving MPA (AUC 0.791 [95% CI 0.658-0.923], SE 0.07, P=.002). The relative MPA (3.54 METs) ROC curve was generated based on stages 2 to 4 (mean ranging from 2.7 to 4.4 METs). The optimal step rate was 118.5 spm, with 83.3% correctly classified as achieving MPA and 86.8% correctly classified as not achieving MPA (AUC 0.939 [95% CI 0.878-0.999], SE 0.03, P<.001).
|BMIa (kg/m2)||Step rate (steps per minute)|
|3 METsb||4 METs||5 METs||6 METs|
aBMI: body mass index (kg/m2).
bMETs: metabolic equivalents.
For both relative and absolute VPA (5.31 METs and 6.00 METs), the ROC curve was generated based on stages 4 and 5 (mean ranging from 4.4 to 5.7 METs). The optimal step rate for relative VPA was 127.3 spm with 75.0% correctly classified as achieving VPA and 70.0% correctly classified as not achieving VPA (AUC 0.804 [95% CI 0.655-0.953], SE 0.004, P=.004). The absolute VPA ROC curve corresponded to a step rate of 140.0 spm with a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 100% but did not reach statistical significance (AUC 0.793 [95% CI 0.453-1.000], SE 0.17, P=.10).
The primary purpose of this study was to determine the step-rate thresholds associated with MPA and VPA in both absolute and relative terms for older adults. The most accurate model included BMI but not height or leg length as predictor variables in this diverse sample of older adults. In absolute terms, MPA (ie, 3 METs) and VPA (ie, 6 METs) corresponded to approximately 110 spm and approximately 135 spm, respectively. Unlike the previously established 100 spm required to achieve MPA in adults, the results of this study demonstrate that older adults need to walk faster to achieve the same intensity; however, this relationship is altered by BMI status. The sample’s relative MPA (ie, 3.5 METs) and relative VPA (ie, 5.3 METs) equated to approximately 117 spm and approximately 132 spm, respectively.
Recent reviews [, ] discussing the cadence required to achieve MPA and VPA demonstrate the need for more evidence regarding the recommended walking intensity in older populations. Our observed results highlight the importance of considering participants’ physical characteristics when prescribing cadences in older persons. For MPA in absolute terms, older adults who have greater BMI need to take slightly more steps than those with a lower BMI (approximately 5 spm difference between 20 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2). However, this relationship is reversed and magnified at higher MET values (eg, 5 to 6 METs) with older individuals who have higher BMIs needing to take fewer steps per minute to equate to the same intensity as individuals with lower BMIs (approximately 11 spm difference between 20 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2). The observation that BMI influences MPA step-rate thresholds has been previously observed in young adults [ ], in which they also observed negative interaction effects between BMI and METs (BMI*METs*–0.52) in their proposed model (R2=0.68). Contrary to their model, this study’s proposed equation (R2=0.77) was not improved by adding leg length or height as predictor variables, suggesting that BMI impacts the metabolic requirements of walking more than leg length and height in elderly individuals.
The existing studies in older persons have demonstrated that the relationship between cadence and MPA is influenced by either height  or body weight [ ]. Of relevance, BMI and body weight were not explored as predictor variables by Peacock et al [ ]. One limitation of the previous literature is that they modeled the relationship between step cadence and metabolic activity as linear, whereas we clearly demonstrate that it is curvilinear (see ), which would alter step rate predictions. Additionally, the model proposed by Serrano et al [ ] uses body weight and self-selected walking cadence to predict MPA in relative terms; using self-selected cadence as a predictor variable decreases the practicality of their model in comparison to using height or BMI. The model proposed by Peacock et al [ ] uses step rate as a predictor variable and METs as the outcome variable, requiring a back calculation of the required cadence for a given MET value. Consistent with some [ , ], but not all [ , ] previous research, we used step rate as the outcome variable because it does not require a back calculation of MET values making it is much easier to use by health care and exercise professionals in calculating their patients’ MVPA step-rate thresholds. As well, both methods produce almost identical values. We do acknowledge that metabolic intensity is a function of stepping cadence but we opted for an equation that is simpler, performs just as well, and is easier to use.
A systematic review by Slaght and colleagues  calls for more evidence regarding the prescription of walking cadence as a means of increasing physical activity in practical settings. Whether older adults achieve MPA at higher cadences than their younger counterparts (eg, 100 spm) is controversial in the literature; however, our results demonstrate that 3 METs is reached at 105 to 110 spm in older adults, depending on BMI status. Certainly, there is merit to the heuristic public health recommendation of 3000 steps in 30 minutes (ie, 100 spm). However, individualizing step-rate thresholds would minimize the potential error associated with not considering BMI. This is of particular importance when recommending cadences that equate to higher intensity physical activity as VPA step-based thresholds are more affected by BMI status (128 to 141 spm between 20 and 30 kg/m2; see ). To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate VPA step-rate thresholds in older adults. Given the practicality of the 3000 steps in 30 minutes message for MPA, providers may consider recommending 4000 steps in 30 minutes (approximately 133 spm) as a general message to help their patients achieve VPA. However, the study’s reference equation is provided so that providers can individually tailor step rates when deemed appropriate (ie, a physical activity monitor study), based on a patient’s personal level of fitness and calculated moderate and vigorous MET targets. Of importance, our population is representative of a typical older Canadian adult with an average VO2max of fair to good (ie, approximately 7 to 9 METs) [ , ], self-reported MVPA of approximately 30 minutes per day (or 210 minutes per week) [ ], and a BMI in the overweight category (eg, average Canadian approximately 28 kg/m2) [ ], which highlights the generalizability of this study’s results.
This study may be limited by our laboratory evaluations across a defined set of walking speed in that the proposed models are limited to step rates between approximately 90 to 135 spm. Although a broad range of walking conditions were used, more stages in the vigorous zone would have improved our predictions of VPA cadences. However, to our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate VPA step-rate thresholds in older populations. Furthermore, the findings of our study may be limited to BMI status’ as the range of BMIs in this sample was 20.6 to 31.2 kg/m2 and there were only 4 participants in the obese class 1 (30.0 to 34.9 kg/m2) category. However, the overall trend of lower VPA step-rate thresholds as BMI increases would likely not change if a greater proportion of obese persons were studied. Regardless, future research incorporating older adults of a broader range of BMI status’ (ie, obese class 2, obese class 3) are warranted. There may be differences in applicability to free-living conditions, although walking on a treadmill is kinetically and kinematically equivalent to walking over ground in healthy subjects . As well, our sample size may be considered a limitation, but it is reflective of similar studies investigating MVPA step-rate thresholds [ , , , , ], and participants completed up to 5 walking stages that resulted in multiple data points per subject. We do acknowledge that a larger sample size would likely corroborate the findings of this study and anticipate that the results from the forthcoming Cadence-Adults study will further strengthen recommendations for MVPA step-rate thresholds in young and older adults [ ]. Lastly, the use of a submaximal assessment of aerobic fitness may be considered a limitation; however, the single stage treadmill protocol is a valid indicator of aerobic fitness [ ] and the most practical for exercise professionals to adopt given their limited time allotted to assess patient fitness and provide an exercise program. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of pedometer-based goals (ie, 3000 or 4000 steps in 30 minutes) in helping more of the older adult population achieve the national physical activity guidelines and reduce their risk of chronic disease.
Walking is the most common form of leisure-time physical activity among older adults but the cadences required to achieve MPA and VPA in this population are understudied. This study provides evidence that older adults achieve absolute MPA and VPA at approximately 110 spm and approximately 135 spm, respectively, which is higher than the public health recommendation of 100 spm required to reach MPA previously reported. Further, anthropometric factors such as BMI significantly influence the curvilinear relationship between step rate and intensity-related physical activity. The findings of this study support that health care professionals and researchers should individualize MVPA step-rate thresholds based on their elderly patients’ body sizes and, when possible, use relative MPA and VPA values.
MWO and WRW were supported by the Acadia University Research Fund.
Conflicts of Interest
Support was provided by the Acadia Research Support Fund and an unrestricted research grant from StepsCount Inc (grant #12-054). JRF is the Chair of Exercise for Medicine Canada, which has received in-kind contributions of product and marketing from StepsCount. StepsCount had no influence on the design of the study, the analysis of the results, or the writing of the paper.
- Blair SN. Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem of the 21st century. Br J Sports Med 2009 Jan;43(1):1-2. [Medline]
- Brown JC, Harhay MO, Harhay MN. Walking cadence and mortality among community-dwelling older adults. J Gen Intern Med 2014 Sep;29(9):1263-1269 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- American College of Sports Medicine, Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone SMA, Minson CT, Nigg CR, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand: exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 Jul;41(7):1510-1530. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Health Fact Sheet: Directly measured physical activity of adults, 2012 and 2013.: Statistics Canada URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-625-x/2015001/article/14135-eng.pdf [accessed 2018-11-20] [WebCite Cache]
- Tremblay MS, Warburton DER, Janssen I, Paterson DH, Latimer AE, Rhodes RE, et al. New Canadian physical activity guidelines. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2011 Feb;36(1):36-47 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- McLellan AG, Slaght J, Craig CM, Mayo A, Sénéchal M, Bouchard DR. Can older adults improve the identification of moderate intensity using walking cadence? Aging Clin Exp Res 2018 Jan;30(1):89-92. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Marshall SJ, Levy SS, Tudor-Locke CE, Kolkhorst FW, Wooten KM, Ji M, et al. Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based step goal: 3000 steps in 30 minutes. Am J Prev Med 2009 May;36(5):410-415. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Abel M, Hannon J, Mullineaux D, Beighle A. Determination of step rate thresholds corresponding to physical activity intensity classifications in adults. J Phys Act Health 2011 Jan;8(1):45-51. [Medline]
- Beets MW, Agiovlasitis S, Fahs CA, Ranadive SM, Fernhall B. Adjusting step count recommendations for anthropometric variations in leg length. J Sci Med Sport 2010 Sep;13(5):509-512. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Tudor-Locke C, Sisson SB, Collova T, Lee SM, Swan PD. Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Can J Appl Physiol 2005 Dec;30(6):666-676. [Medline]
- Peacock L, Hewitt A, Rowe DA, Sutherland R. Stride rate and walking intensity in healthy older adults. J Aging Phys Act 2014 Apr;22(2):276-283. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Serrano F, Slaght J, Sénéchal M, Duhamel T, Bouchard DR. Identification and prediction of the walking cadence required to reach moderate intensity using individually-determined relative moderate intensity in older adults. J Aging Phys Act 2017 Apr;25(2):205-211. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Georgiopoulou VV, Kalogeropoulos AP, Chowdhury R, Binongo JNG, Bibbins-Domingo K, Rodondi N, Health ABC Study. Exercise capacity, heart failure risk, and mortality in older adults: the Health ABC Study. Am J Prev Med 2017 Feb;52(2):144-153 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Nagasaki H, Itoh H, Hashizume K, Furuna T, Maruyama H, Kinugasa T. Walking patterns and finger rhythm of older adults. Percept Mot Skills 1996 Apr;82(2):435-447. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology—Physical Activity Training for Health (CSEP-PATH). Ottawa: Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology; 2013.
- American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2013.
- Kimura T, Kobayashi H, Nakayama E, Kakihana W. Seasonality in physical activity and walking of healthy older adults. J Physiol Anthropol 2015 Oct 02;34:33 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Hall KS, Morey MC, Dutta C, Manini TM, Weltman AL, Nelson ME, et al. Activity-related energy expenditure in older adults: a call for more research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014 Dec;46(12):2335-2340 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Slaght J, Sénéchal M, Bouchard DR. Impact of walking cadence prescription to reach the global physical activity recommendations in older adults. J Aging Phys Act 2017 Oct 01;25(4):604-611. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Tudor-Locke C, Han H, Aguiar EJ, Barreira TV, Schuna JM, Kang M, et al. How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med 2018 Jun;52(12):776-788 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Rowe DA, Welk GJ, Heil DP, Mahar MT, Kemble CD, Calabró MA, et al. Stride rate recommendations for moderate-intensity walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 Feb;43(2):312-318. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Agiovlasitis S, Beets MW, Motl RW, Fernhall B. Step-rate thresholds for moderate and vigorous-intensity activity in persons with Down syndrome. J Sci Med Sport 2012 Sep;15(5):425-430. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Agiovlasitis S, Motl RW. Step-rate thresholds for physical activity intensity in persons with multiple sclerosis. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2014 Jan;31(1):4-18. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bredin SSD, Gledhill N, Jamnik V, Warburton DER. PAR-Q+ and ePARmed-X+: new risk stratification and physical activity clearance strategy for physicians and patients alike. Can Fam Physician 2013 Mar;59(3):273-277 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- O'Brien MW, Kivell MJ, Wojcik WR, d'Entremont G, Kimmerly DS, Fowles JR. Step rate thresholds associated with moderate and vigorous physical activity in adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018 Nov 03;15(11):E2454 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Fowles JR, O'Brien MW, Wojcik WR, d'Entremont L, Shields CA. A pilot study: validity and reliability of the CSEP-PATH PASB-Q and a new leisure time physical activity questionnaire to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviours. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2017 Jun;42(6):677-680 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ebbeling CB, Ward A, Puleo EM, Widrick J, Rippe JM. Development of a single-stage submaximal treadmill walking test. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991 Aug;23(8):966-973. [Medline]
- Heyward V, Gibson A. Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise Prescription, 7th Edition. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2014.
- O'Brien MW, Wojcik WR, Fowles JR. Medical-grade physical activity monitoring for measuring step count and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: validity and reliability study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 Sep 05;6(9):e10706 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Borg G. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982;14(5):377-381. [Medline]
- Fan J, Upadhye S, Worster A. Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. CJEM 2006 Jan;8(1):19-20. [Medline]
- Burnham K, Anderson D, Huyvaert K. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2010 Aug 18;65(1):23-35. [CrossRef]
- Health Fact Sheet: Aerobic fitness in Canada 2007 to 2009.: Statistics Canada; 2011. URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-625-x/2010001/article/11092-eng.pdf [accessed 2018-11-20] [WebCite Cache]
- Garriguet D, Colley RC. A comparison of self-reported leisure-time physical activity and measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in adolescents and adults. Health Rep 2014 Jul;25(7):3-11 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- Health Fact Sheet: Body composition of Canadian adults 2007 to 2009.: Statistics Canada; 2011. URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-625-x/2010001/article/11091-eng.pdf [accessed 2018-11-20]
- Riley PO, Paolini G, Della CU, Paylo KW, Kerrigan DC. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 2007 Jun;26(1):17-24. [CrossRef] [Medline]
|AIC: Akaike information criterion|
|AUC: area under the curve|
|BMI: body mass index|
|CSEP: Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology|
|MET: metabolic equivalent|
|METmax: relative estimated VO2max divided by 3.5 mL/kg/min|
|MPA: moderate-intensity physical activity|
|MVPA: moderate-to-vigorous physical activity|
|PAR-Q+: Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire Plus|
|PASB-Q: Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire|
|ROC: receiver operating characteristic|
|RPE: rating of perceived exertion|
|spm: steps per minute|
|VO2: volume rate of oxygen consumed|
|VO2max: maximal aerobic fitness|
|VPA: vigorous-intensity physical activity|
Edited by J Wang; submitted 29.09.18; peer-reviewed by R Pryce; comments to author 08.11.18; revised version received 15.11.18; accepted 15.11.18; published 13.12.18Copyright
©Myles William O'Brien, Matthew Jordan Kivell, William Robert Wojcik, Ghislain Richard D'Entremont, Derek Stephen Kimmerly, Jonathon Richard Fowles. Originally published in JMIR Aging (http://aging.jmir.org), 13.12.2018.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.