This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Cognitive Training for the Elderly (98) Cognitive and Neurorehabilitation (267)
Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/12031, first published .
The Impact of the Virtual Cognitive Health Program on the Cognition and Mental Health of Older Adults: Pre-Post 12-Month Pilot Study

The Impact of the Virtual Cognitive Health Program on the Cognition and Mental Health of Older Adults: Pre-Post 12-Month Pilot Study

The Impact of the Virtual Cognitive Health Program on the Cognition and Mental Health of Older Adults: Pre-Post 12-Month Pilot Study

Authors of this article:

Shefali Kumar1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jennifer LA Tran1 Author Orcid Image ;   Heidi Moseson1 Author Orcid Image ;   Caroline Tai1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jordan M Glenn2 Author Orcid Image ;   Erica N Madero2 Author Orcid Image ;   Caitlyn Krebs2 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicholas Bott2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Jessie L Juusola1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (22) Tweetations (3) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1Evidation Health, San Mateo, CA, United States

    2Neurotrack Technologies, Inc, Redwood City, CA, United States

    3Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States

    4PGSP-Stanford PsyD Consortium, Department of Clinical Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, United States

    Corresponding Author:

    Shefali Kumar, MPH

    Evidation Health

    167 2nd Avenue

    San Mateo, CA, 94401

    United States

    Phone: 1 8606708250

    Email: skumar@evidation.com


    Background: Face-to-face multidomain lifestyle interventions have shown to be effective for improving or maintaining cognitive function in older adults at risk for dementia. Remotely delivered interventions could increase access to such solutions but first require evidence to support that these programs can successfully impact health outcomes.

    Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a remotely delivered multidomain lifestyle intervention, the virtual cognitive health (VC Health) program, on the cognitive function and mental health of older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD).

    Methods: A 52-week, prospective, single-arm, pre-post, remote nationwide clinical trial was conducted to measure the change in cognitive function, depression, and anxiety levels for older adults at risk of developing dementia who participated in the VC Health program. A Web-based study platform was used to screen, consent, and enroll participants across the United States. Participants completed the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) test and Web-based assessments (which included the Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7] surveys) at baseline and weeks 12, 24, and 52; all data were collected remotely. Changes in RBANS, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 were assessed using 2-tailed paired t tests and nonparametric signed-rank tests.

    Results: Participants (N=82) were, on average, aged 64 years (range 60.0-74.9 years), 74% (61/82) female, 88% (72/82) white, and 67% (55/82) had a college degree or higher. At baseline, participants had a mean and median RBANS Total Index score of 95.9 (SD 11.1) and 95.5 (interquartile range, IQR=13). Participants experienced a mean and median increase of 5.8 (SD 7.4) and 6 (IQR=11) in RBANS Total Index score from baseline to week 52 (P<.001). Participants had a mean and median PHQ-9 score of 8.5 (SD 4.9) and 8 (IQR=6) at baseline and experienced a mean and median decrease of 3.8 (SD 4.1) and 4 (IQR=6) units in PHQ-9 score from baseline to week 52 (P<.001). At baseline, participants had a mean and median GAD-7 score of 6.2 (SD 4.5) and 5.5 (IQR=6) and experienced a mean and median decrease of 2.9 (SD 4.1) and 2 (IQR=5) units in GAD-7 score from baseline to week 52 (P<.001). Participants were engaged and very satisfied with various program components.

    Conclusions: In this study, older adults with SCD who were at risk for dementia experienced statistically significant improvements in their cognitive function, depression, and anxiety levels. These findings serve as initial evidence for the overall feasibility and effectiveness of the VC Health program to improve or maintain cognitive function in older adults who are experiencing SCD. Further research should be conducted to understand the degree to which the improvements are attributable to specific components of the intervention.

    Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02969460; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02969460 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73XOph9Qm)

    JMIR Aging 2018;1(2):e12031

    doi:10.2196/12031

    Keywords

    cognitive impairment; dementia; Alzheimer disease; mental health 


    Background

    By 2035, the number of individuals older than 65 years in the United States is projected to outnumber those younger than 18 years [1]. With age, many individuals begin to experience cognitive changes that affect memory, learning, language, and judgment, all of which can impact the ability to perform daily tasks [2]. In the early stages of cognitive change, individuals may experience subjective cognitive decline (SCD), in which subjective changes in memory and cognition are perceived but are not associated with clinically measurable abnormalities [3,4]. These individuals are considered at-risk for developing dementia, particularly Alzheimer disease (AD) [5-7]. If cognitive decline continues to worsen, SCD can progress to mild cognitive impairment, an intermediate state between normal cognition and dementia, in which there are clinically observable changes in measures of cognitive function [4-8].

    Dementia places a significant burden on the health care system in terms of cost and caregiver hours. With a lifetime cost of care estimated at US $341,000 per individual, dementia is considered to be one of the world’s costliest health conditions [9]. Total health care expenditures for AD and other dementias in 2018 was estimated at US $277 billion, and this cost is expected to be more than US $1 trillion by 2050 [9]. In addition, family and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.4 billion hours of care (valued at over US $232 billion) to individuals with dementia [9]. Given the high burden of dementia and current lack of efficacious pharmaceutical agents, there is significant value in developing early interventions to help prevent or delay the onset and progression of disease.

    Multidomain interventions that target modifiable lifestyle-related risk factors (eg, nutritional intake, physical activity, and cognitive engagement) can be useful prevention tools, as many studies have linked vascular and lifestyle-related risk factors to an increased risk of cognitive impairment and dementia [10-12]. The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) found that a 2-year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, vascular risk monitoring, and cognitive training could help at-risk older individuals improve or maintain their cognitive functioning [13,14]. Following the success of the FINGER study, numerous replication studies have been launched globally, including the Singapore Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability, Multimodal Intervention to Delay Dementia and Disability in Rural China, and United States Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk studies [15-17]. However, many challenges related to access, cost, and other logistical constraints remain for these multidomain programs. In the current format, individuals are required to visit an office for in-person coaching and assessment, limiting the scalability and reach of the intervention. As new technological developments change the way health care services are delivered, digitally administered lifestyle programs can be an effective and efficient way to help older individuals at risk for developing dementia improve or maintain their cognitive function [18].

    The Virtual Cognitive Health Program

    The Virtual Cognitive (VC) Health program, which was modeled after the FINGER study, is a commercially available, multidomain digital lifestyle intervention for the prevention or delay of cognitive impairment in at-risk aging adults. The year-long digital intervention includes exercise and nutritional guidance, cognitive training, social engagement, and personalized health coaching. The VC Health study aimed to understand the feasibility and effectiveness of the VC Health program, specifically examining the long-term impact this program may have on cognitive function and mental health.


    Study Overview

    The VC Health study was a 52-week, prospective, intention-to-treat (ITT), single-arm, pre-post, remote nationwide clinical trial that aimed to evaluate change in cognitive function and mental health of individuals at-risk for dementia with SCD. A Web-based study platform (Achievement Studies, Evidation Health; San Mateo, CA) was used to screen, consent, and enroll study participants across the United States. The platform was also used to collect study data and monitor completion of study tasks. Participants were able to complete all study procedures from their own homes using a computer with internet access and a webcam. The full details of the study design have been published previously [19], and the study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02969460). The trial was reviewed and approved by the Solutions institutional review board (Little Rock, AR).

    Recruitment and Screening

    Various digital platforms (eg, online patient communities, social media, and targeted advertisements) were utilized to recruit study participants. All interested candidates were asked to complete a Web-based screener via the study platform to assess eligibility. Eligible individuals were aged between 60 and 75 years and showed signs of SCD as assessed by scoring ≥1 on the Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-9) [20] and endorsing the 1-item subjective cognitive decline with worry item (“Do you feel like your memory is becoming worse?” Possible responses were “No,” “Yes, but this does not worry me,” or “Yes, this worries me”) [21]. Individuals also needed to have the ability to make and receive phone calls and text messages; have access to a desktop computer with video teleconferencing and a reliable internet connection, which were required to access the intervention and complete the study procedures; and be motivated to use a daily coaching program, as assessed by self-reported willingness (on a 5-point scale from extremely willing to not at all willing) to participate in the virtual cognitive training coaching program. Individuals were excluded if they had a significant history of dementia, mental illness, substance abuse, learning disability, or neurologic conditions, had ophthalmologic or visual problems (eg, legal blindness, detached retinas, and occlusive cataracts) that prevented them from viewing a computer screen at a normal distance, were currently participating in a formal cognitive-training coaching program, or were currently pregnant.

    Enrollment and Study Procedures

    All eligible participants completed an electronic informed consent form through the Web-based study platform and were asked to complete a Web-based baseline assessment that included questions about demographics, average nightly sleep hours, and weekly diet and exercise habits. Depression and anxiety severity scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) survey were also assessed at baseline [22-24]. Upon completion of the baseline assessment, participants were scheduled to complete a 30-min baseline Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) test [25]. A licensed psychologist used video teleconferencing to administer the RBANS test to qualified candidates (the Echelon Group; Woodstock, GA). The validity of digitally administered neuropsychological tests, including RBANS, has been supported by multiple studies [25-28]. After completing the RBANS test, participants began an initial VC Health coaching session over the phone with a program coach. Individuals were considered enrolled in the VC Health study once this initial coaching session was complete.

    Throughout the study, the participants were asked to complete follow-up RBANS tests and Web-based assessments at weeks 12, 24, and 52. To reduce practice effects due to repeated testing over time, alternate forms of the RBANS test were used at each time point. The Web-based assessments included questions about sleep, activity levels, depression and anxiety symptom severity (PHQ-9 and GAD-7, respectively), and experience with the VC Health program. Participants also completed coaching sessions focused on nutrition, physical activity, and cognitive training as part of the VC Health program during the first 6 months of the study.

    Intervention: Virtual Cognitive Health Program

    The VC Health program is a multidomain lifestyle intervention designed to prevent or delay cognitive decline and impairment in older at-risk adults and comprises 2 phases. The first 6 months of the program (active phase) emphasize lifestyle change, whereas the last 6 months of the program (maintenance phase) emphasize habit reinforcement. The program consists of individually tailored coaching sessions focused on nutrition, physical exercise, and cognitive training. The cognitive training program (provided by MindAgilis; London, England) focused on processing speed, executive function, working memory, episodic memory, and mental speed, which are tasks shown to be associated with improved cognitive ability and less difficulty with instrumental activities of daily living [29,30].

    All program coaches were certified as personal trainers with mastery of exercise physiology safety and nutritional health practices. Coaches were available via telephone, email, and text messaging. To promote social engagement, participants were encouraged to participate in an internal social network with communal support and directed life review prompts adapted from life review protocols moderated by a licensed clinical psychologist.

    Study Outcomes

    The primary outcome of the VC Health study was change in RBANS Total Index score from baseline to week 24 and week 52. The RBANS test has demonstrated strong efficacy as a dementia assessment tool and can also detect cognitive impairment associated with AD [31-33]. Secondary outcomes included change in PHQ-9 depression severity scores and change in GAD-7 anxiety severity scores from baseline to week 24 and week 52, as both depression and anxiety are risk factors for AD [34,35]. RBANS, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 data were also collected at week 12 to allow for interim nonprimary analysis. Exploratory analyses assessed the association between various engagement measures with the VC Health program and change in RBANS, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 scores.

    Sample Size and Statistical Analyses

    Due to its preliminary nature, the VC Health study was not powered to detect any specific difference in RBANS score. On the basis of the overall capacity of the VC Health program, 85 participants were enrolled in the study.

    Baseline sociodemographic characteristics were collected for all individuals in the ITT population. For the primary analysis, mean and median change in RBANS Total Index score from baseline to week 24 and baseline to week 52 were compared using a 2-tailed paired t test and a nonparametric signed-rank test. Similar analyses were conducted to evaluate the mean and median changes in RBANS Total Index score and the 5 RBANS Sub-Index scores (immediate memory, visuospatial, language, attention, and delayed memory) across various time points (baseline to week 24, baseline to week 52, and week 24 to week 52).

    For the secondary analysis, mean and median change in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 from baseline to week 24 and baseline to week 52 were assessed using a 2-tailed paired t test and a nonparametric signed-rank test. Similar analyses were conducted to measure the mean and median changes in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 across additional time points (baseline to week 24, baseline to week 52, and week 24 to week 52).

    We also conducted an unadjusted repeated measures analysis using a linear mixed model with a random intercept specific for each participant to account for intraparticipant correlation. The model used baseline; weeks 12, 24, and 52 RBANS; PHQ-9; and GAD-7 scores for the repeated measures analysis. This analysis included all individuals in the analysis set and was not limited to those individuals with complete data at baseline and week 52. Results for RBANS Total Index score, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 were stratified by key participant characteristics, including sex (female vs male), ethnicity (white vs nonwhite), and education level (college degree or higher vs less than college degree). Supplemental analyses used a linear regression model to explore the relationship between various user engagement metrics such as number of coaching calls and changes in RBANS, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 scores. All analyses were conducted in Stata version 14.2 or R version 3.5.0, with an alpha of .05 for assessment of statistical significance.


    Study Sample

    Of the 4255 individuals who initiated the Web-based screening process, 28.08% (1195/4255) did not complete the screener, 62.40% (2655/4255) completed the screener but were deemed ineligible for the study, and 9.52% (405/4255) completed the screener and were eligible for the study. Among all 3060 individuals who completed the screener, the top reasons for study ineligibility included not endorsing the 1-item subjective cognitive decline with worry question (80.03%, 2449/3060), not willing to use a virtual coaching program (14.28%, 437/3060), and an SCD-9 score <1 (11.96%, 366/3060). Of the 405 individuals who completed the screener, 57.8% (234/405) did not complete the informed consent process. Of the 171 individuals who completed informed consent, the majority (95.3%, 163/171) completed the baseline survey. A total of 68 individuals (41.7%, 68/163) of the 163 participants who completed the baseline survey did not schedule or complete the initial RBANS test. Of the 95 individuals who completed the initial RBANS test, 11% (10/95) never scheduled or completed their initial VC Health program coaching session. A total of 85 individuals completed all of the required steps, including the initial coaching session, and enrolled in the study. A total of 3 participants withdrew from the study because they no longer wanted to participate in the program or study. As such, 82 participants were included in the analysis set (Figure 1).

    Table 1 details the characteristics of the study population. A majority of the study population was female (74%, 61/82), white (88%, 72/82), and had a college degree or higher (67%, 55/82). Mean age of the population was 64 years (range 60-74.9 years). The ITT population represented a geographically diverse population comprising 29 different states in the United States [19].

    Primary Outcome: Cognition

    At the 24-week time point, RBANS Total Index score decreased from baseline, but the change was not statistically significant (P=.15). Among the 72 participants who completed both their baseline and week 24 RBANS test, mean and median RBANS Total Index score was 96.3 (SD 11.2) and 96 (IQR=13) at baseline, and 95.0 (SD 9.3) and 95 (IQR=13) at week 24, respectively, for an unadjusted mean and median change of −1.4 (SD 8.1) and 0 (IQR=10) units (Table 2). Of the 5 Sub-Index scores, participants experienced a statistically significant change (a slight decrease) in the immediate memory domain (P=.02; Table 2).

    ‎
    Figure 1. Study diagram. RBANS: Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.
    View this figure
    Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study population (N=82).
    Characteristics at baselineStatistics
    Age in years, mean (SD)64 (4)
    Gender, n (%)

    		Male20 (24)

    		Female61 (74)

    		Other1 (1)
    Education, n (%)

    		High school graduate or general education development degree3 (4)

    		Trade, technical or vocational training2 (2)

    		Some college, no degree22 (27)

    		College graduate, associate’s or bachelor’s29 (35)

    		Graduate degree19 (23)

    		Doctorate degree7 (9)
    Race/ethnicity, n (%)

    		African American5 (6)

    		Asian1 (1)

    		White72 (88)

    		Hispanic3 (4)

    		Other1 (1)
    BMIa, n (%)

    		Underweight, <18.5 kg/m20 (0)

    		Healthy weight, 18.5-24.9 kg/m216 (20)

    		Overweight, 25.0-29.9 kg/m224 (29)

    		Obese, 30-34.9 kg/m225 (30)

    		Very obese, ≥35 kg/m215 (18)
    Average nightly sleep duration, n (%)

    		<3 hours1 (1)

    		4 to 5 hours4 (5)

    		5 to 6 hours18 (22)

    		6 to 7 hours35 (43)

    		7 to 8 hours16 (20)

    		8 to 9 hours6 (7)

    		9 to 10 hours0 (0)

    		>10 hours2 (2)

    aBMI: body mass index.

    At the 52-week time point, participants experienced a statistically significant increase in RBANS Total Index score from baseline (P<.001). Among the 66 participants who completed both their baseline and week 52 RBANS test, mean and median RBANS Total Index score was 96.9 (SD 10.7) and 97 (IQR=15) at baseline, and 102.7 (SD 9.9) and 101.5 (IQR=13) at week 52, respectively, for an unadjusted mean and median increase of 5.8 (SD 7.4) and 6 (IQR=11) units (P<.001; Table 2). Of the 5 Sub-Index scores, participants experienced a statistically significant increase from baseline to week 52 in immediate memory, language, and delayed memory Sub-Index scores (P<.001; Table 2).

    Comprehensive mean and median RBANS Total Index scores for all individuals who completed the RBANS test at each study time point are shown in Table 3 and Figure 2.

    Table 2. Change in mean and median Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) scores.
    MetricNMean (SD)aMedian (IQRb)c
    Total Index score

    		Baseline to week 24 change72−1.4 (8.1)0 (10)

    		Baseline to week 52 change665.8 (7.4)d6 (11)d

    		Week 24 to week 52 change646.8 (6.3)d6 (8)d
    Immediate memory

    		Baseline to week 24 change72−3.7 (12.7)f−3.5 (14.5)e

    		Baseline to week 52 change667.8 (11.4)d8 (15)d

    		Week 24 to week 52 change6412.2 (11.3)d12 (17)d
    Visuospatial

    		Baseline to week 24 change72−0.5 (14.9)0 (21.5)

    		Baseline to week 52 change660.5 (13.7)0 (22)

    		Week 24 to week 52 change640.3 (11.1)0 (16)
    Language

    		Baseline to week 24 change720.9 (11.0)2 (11.5)

    		Baseline to week 52 change665.7 (12.5)d5.5 (15)d

    		Week 24 to week 52 change644.5 (9.7)d5 (11.5)d
    Attention

    		Baseline to week 24 change72−1.5 (12.1)−3 (13)

    		Baseline to week 52 change662.0 (12.6)0 (16)

    		Week 24 to week 52 change643.5 (9.7)e3 (13)e
    Delayed memory

    		Baseline to week 24 change720.9 (10.5)0 (9.5)

    		Baseline to week 52 change665.4 (12.5)d4 (14)d

    		Week 24 to week 52 change643.6 (9.0)e4 (7)d

    aP values in the mean column are calculated using 2-sided paired t tests to compare means at the 2 time points.

    bIQR: interquartile range.

    cP values in the median column are calculated using 2-sided nonparametric signed-rank tests to compare distributions at the 2 time points.

    dP<.001.

    eP<.01.

    fP=.02.

    Secondary Outcomes: Mental Health

    Depression symptom levels (as measured by PHQ-9) decreased from baseline to week 24. Among the 69 participants who completed both their baseline and week 24 PHQ-9 tests, mean and median PHQ-9 was 8.6 (SD 4.8) and 8 (IQR=6) at baseline and 5.5 (SD 5.2) and 4 (IQR=6) at week 24, respectively, for a statistically significant unadjusted mean and median PHQ-9 change of −3.1 (SD 4.7) and −3 (IQR=6) units (P<.001; Table 4). At the 52-week time point, depression symptom levels also decreased from baseline. Among the 59 participants who completed both their baseline and week 52 PHQ-9 test, mean and median PHQ-9 were 8.3 (SD 5.0) and 8.0 (IQR=6) at baseline and 4.5 (SD 4.5) and 3.0 (IQR=5) at week 52, respectively, for a statistically significant unadjusted mean and median PHQ-9 change of −3.8 (SD 4.1) and −4 (IQR=6) units (P<.001; Table 4).

    Similar results were observed with anxiety symptom levels (as measured by GAD-7). Among the 69 participants who completed both their baseline and week 24 GAD-7 tests, mean and median GAD-7 were 6.2 (SD 4.4) and 6 (IQR=6) at baseline and 3.9 (SD 4.6) and 3 (IQR=4) at week 24, respectively, for a statistically significant unadjusted mean and median GAD-7 change of −2.3 (SD 4.3) and −2 (IQR=4) units (P<.001; Table 4). Among the 59 participants who completed both their baseline and week 52 GAD-7 test, mean and median GAD-7 were 6.0 (SD 4.7) and 5 (IQR=7) at baseline and 3.1 (SD 4.1) and 2 (IQR=4) at week 52, respectively, for a statistically significant unadjusted mean and median GAD-7 change of −2.9 (SD 4.1) and −2 (IQR=5) units (P<.001; Table 4).

    Comprehensive mean and median PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores for all individuals who completed the assessments at each study time point are shown in Table 5 and Figures 3 and 4.

    Primary and Secondary Outcomes: Mixed-Effects Model Analysis

    In the repeated measures analysis using a mixed-effects model with a random intercept specific for each participant in the study population (N=82), we found that the marginal mean change in RBANS Total Index score was consistent with our results from the primary analysis. Using a mixed-effects model, we found that the marginal mean change in RBANS Total Index score was −1.3 (95% CI −3.0 to 0.4) from baseline to week 24 (P=.14) and 5.7 (95% CI 3.9 to 7.5) from baseline to week 52 (P<.001).

    Table 3. Mean and median Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) scores.
    MetricNMean (SD)Median (IQRa)
    Total Index score

    		Baseline8295.9 (11.1)95.5 (13)

    		Week 1273100.8 (11.7)100 (18)

    		Week 247295.0 (9.3)95 (13)

    		Week 5266102.7 (9.9)101.5 (13)
    Immediate memory

    		Baseline8299.4 (12.5)103 (22)

    		Week 1273100.8 (13.0)103 (19)

    		Week 247295.4 (13.2)97 (21)

    		Week 5266107.4 (10.8)109 (11)
    Visuospatial

    		Baseline8290.4 (14.3)87 (19)

    		Week 127395.5 (13.2)96 (16)

    		Week 247290.1 (12.1)89 (18.5)

    		Week 526691.2 (12.2)92 (21)
    Language

    		Baseline8297.2 (10.2)96 (9)

    		Week 1273104 (10.7)104 (13)

    		Week 247298.9 (8.1)98 (10.5)

    		Week 5266103.8 (9.3)101 (12)
    Attention

    		Baseline82102.8 (14.8)101.5 (24)

    		Week 1273103.3 (16.5)103 (21)

    		Week 2472102.1 (12.7)103 (19.5)

    		Week 5266107.1 (14.7)106 (18)
    Delayed memory

    		Baseline8296.6 (12.5)98 (20)

    		Week 1273100.8 (13.3)102 (15)

    		Week 247297.6 (9.4)98 (7)

    		Week 5266102.2 (10.4)102 (12)

    aIQR: interquartile range.

    ‎
    Figure 2. Change in mean Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Index score over time.
    View this figure
    Table 4. Change in mean and median Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 survey (GAD-7) scores.
    MetricNMean (SD)aMedian (IQRb)c
    PHQ-9 total score

    		Baseline to week 24 change69−3.1 (4.7)d−3 (6)d

    		Baseline to week 52 change59−3.8 (4.1)d−4 (6)d

    		Week 24 to week 52 change56−0.8 (3.6)−1 (4)e
    GAD-7 total score

    		Baseline to week 24 change69−2.3 (4.3)d−2 (4)d

    		Baseline to week 52 change59−2.9 (4.1)d−2 (5)d

    		Week 24 to week 52 change56−0.8 (3.7)0 (3.5)

    aP values in the mean column are calculated using two-sided paired t tests to compare means at the 2 time points.

    bIQR: interquartile range.

    cP values in the median column are calculated using two-sided nonparametric signed-rank tests to compare distributions at the 2 time points.

    dP<.001.

    eP=.01.

    We conducted similar analyses for PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores. Using a mixed-effects model, we found that the marginal mean change in PHQ-9 score was −3.0 (95% CI −4.1 to −2.0) from baseline to week 24 (P<.001) and −3.8 (95% CI −4.8 to −2.9) from baseline to week 52 (P<.001). The marginal mean change in GAD-7 score was −2.3 (95% CI −3.3 to −1.4) from baseline to week 24 (P<.001) and −3.0 (95% CI −4.0 to −2.1) from baseline to week 52 (P<.001). These marginal mean changes in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 from the mixed-effects model were similar to the mean changes from our primary analysis.

    Primary and Secondary Outcomes: Stratified by Key Characteristics

    Baseline RBANS, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 scores were similar across all demographic subgroups analyzed (Table 6). Mean change in RBANS Total Index score from baseline to week 24 was similar between each respective cohort (Table 7). The increase in RBANS score between baseline and week 52 was significantly higher for females (mean change 7.2 [SD 6.9]) compared with males (mean change 1.1 [SD 7.0]; Table 7); however, the difference in mean change was not significant when stratified by race or education. Stratification did not show any differences when looking at difference in mean change in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores from baseline to week 24 and baseline to week 52.

    Exploratory Analyses: Lifestyle Factors, Program Satisfaction, and Program Engagement

    Participants reported high satisfaction rates with the program. Of study participants who completed the study end questionnaire at 52 weeks (n=59), 86% (51/59) reported that the VC Health program was at least moderately helpful in improving their cognitive ability. Almost 69% (41/59) of participants felt the VC Health program was at least moderately helpful in improving their sleep habits. At baseline, participants reported sleeping on average 6.5 hours (SD 1.3) per night, whereas at week 52, participants reported sleeping 6.6 hours per night (SD 1.2; P=.50).

    Table 5. Mean and median Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 survey (GAD-7) scores.
    MetricNMean (SD)Median (IQRa)
    PHQ-9 score

    		Baseline828.5 (4.9)8 (6)

    		Week 12544.8 (4.0)3.5 (5)

    		Week 24695.5 (5.2)4 (6)

    		Week 52594.5 (4.5)3 (5)
    GAD-7 score

    		Baseline826.2 (4.5)5.5 (6)

    		Week 12543.0 (3.4)2 (5)

    		Week 24693.9 (4.6)3 (4)

    		Week 52593.1 (4.1)2 (4)

    aIQR: interquartile range.

    ‎
    Figure 3. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores over time.
    View this figure

    A total of 86% (51/59) and 80% (47/59) of participants reported that the VC Health program was at least moderately helpful in improving their diet and eating habits, and physical activity levels, respectively. At baseline, participants reported exercising an average of 2.8 days per week (SD 2.4), whereas at week 52, participants reported exercising 3.9 days per week (SD 1.8; P=.01). A total of 93% (55/59) of study participants reported that the program made at least some impact on their daily food decisions. Average body mass index (BMI; based on self-reported height and weight) also decreased in the 52-week study period, but this change was not statistically significant; at baseline, BMI was 29.9 kg/m2 (SD 6.3), and at the end of the study, BMI was 29.2 kg/m2 (SD 5.7; P=.07). A majority of participants (75%, 44/59) reported that the VC Health program at least moderately improved their stress levels.

    ‎
    Figure 4. Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores over time.
    View this figure
    Table 6. Change in mean Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 survey (GAD-7) scores stratified by sex, race, and education level.
    OutcomeStratification by sexaStratification by raceStratification by education level

    		FemaleMaleWhiteNonwhiteCollege degree or aboveBelow college degree

    		NMean change (SD)NMean change (SD)NMean change (SD)NMean change (SD)NMean change (SD)NMean change (SD)
    Total Index score

    		Baseline to week 24 change53−0.9 (8.4)18−3.1 (7.4)64−1.1 (7.8)8−3.5 (10.8)48−0.6 (7.7)24−2.8 (8.8)

    		Baseline to week 52 change507.2b (7.1)151.1b (7.0)596.1 (7.0)72.6 (10.7)456.8 (7.0)213.6 (8.0)
    PHQ-9 total score

    		Baseline to week 24 change52−2.8 (5.0)16−4.1 (3.2)60−3.2 (4.4)9−2.9 (6.3)46−3.1 (5.1)23−3.1 (3.6)

    		Baseline to week 52 change45−3.6 (4.3)13−4.3 (3.7)54−3.9 (4.2)5−2.6 (3.6)42−4.0 (4.2)17−3.2 (4.0)
    GAD-7 total score

    		Baseline to week 24 change52−2.0 (4.6)16−2.9 (2.8)60−2.0 (4.3)9−4.4 (3.7)46−2.5 (4.8)23−1.8 (2.8)

    		Baseline to week 52 change45−2.7 (4.4)13−3.5 (3.0)54−2.8 (4.1)5−4.0 (4.1)42−3.0 (4.4)17−2.6 (3.5)

    aOne participant identified as other sex; thus, we do not report data for the other category.

    bP=.005 when comparing the difference between females and males.

    Table 7. Mean Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 survey (GAD-7) scores stratified by sex, race, and education level.
    OutcomeStratification by sexaStratification by raceStratification by education level

    		FemaleMaleWhiteNonwhiteCollege degree or aboveBelow college degree

    		NMean (SD)NMean (SD)NMean (SD)NMean (SD)NMean (SD)NMean (SD)
    Total Index score

    		Baseline6196.4 (11.0)2093.7 (11.1)7295.9 (10.6)1096.1 (14.9)5596.2 (11.2)2795.2 (10.9)

    		Week 1255102.4 (11.2)1795.6 (12.2)66101.3 (11.1)796.1 (16.4)48101.8 (12.2)2599.0 (10.5)

    		Week 245395.8 (9.2)1891.8 (8.7)6495.2 (9.0)893.1 (12.1)4896.0 (9.6)2492.9 (8.6)

    		Week 5250103.9 (10.4)1598.1 (6.8)59102.5 (10.1)7104.4 (8.7)45103.6 (10.1)21100.8 (9.5)
    PHQ-9 total score

    		Baseline618.4 (5.1)209.0 (4.4)728.8 (5.1)106.6 (3.0)558.4 (5.0)278.8 (4.8)

    		Week 12394.5 (3.4)145.6 (5.5)475.1 (4.1)73.0 (2.7)384.5 (3.6)165.5 (5.0)

    		Week 24525.9 (5.7)164.3 (3.0)605.8 (4.9)93.6 (6.7)465.3 (5.2)235.9 (5.3)

    		Week 52454.7 (4.8)133.8 (3.5)544.8 (4.5)52.2 (3.8)424.4 (3.9)174.9 (5.7)
    GAD-7 total score

    		Baseline616.0 (4.7)206.7 (3.9)726.2 (4.7)106.3 (2.8)556.2 (4.8)276.1 (4.1)

    		Week 12393.1 (3.4)143.0 (3.7)473.2 (3.5)72.0 (2.1)382.7 (3.0)163.9 (4.1)

    		Week 24523.9 (4.8)163.8 (3.9)604.2 (4.7)91.7 (2.4)463.5 (4.6)234.6 (4.5)

    		Week 52453.0 (4.3)132.9 (3.6)543.2 (4.2)52.0 (2.8)423.0 (4.0)173.3 (4.3)

    aOne participant identified as other sex; thus, we do not report data for the other category.

    Overall, the mean and median numbers of coaching calls completed by study participants over the 12-month study period were 16.5 (SD 9.6) and 16.0 (IQR=12.3), respectively. The mean and median call length was 12.9 min (SD 5.9) and 11.7 min (IQR=6.9), respectively. When comparing program engagement and change in RBANS Total Index score, we found no statistically significant association between change in Total RBANS Index score and number of phone calls, number of interactions with the program’s social media platform, or number of participant food and exercise logs. We found a statistically significant inverse association with the number of completed phone calls and change in PHQ-9 (beta=−.16, P=.01) and GAD-7 (beta=−.17, P=.008) between baseline and week 52. For each additional call, PHQ-9 scores improved by 0.16 units and GAD-7 scores improved by 0.17 units. Lower PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores correspond to lower levels of depression and anxiety; therefore, a negative change in average PHQ-9 and GAD-7 score from baseline to week 52 indicates an improvement in mental health status. There was also an inverse association between the number of food and exercise logs entered by the participant and change in PHQ-9 (beta=−.01, P=.03) and GAD-7 (beta=−.01, P=.002). For each additional day that a participant logged their food or exercise, the average PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores improved by 0.01 units.


    Principal Findings

    This study provides a number of key insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of the VC Health program, a remotely delivered multidomain lifestyle intervention designed for the prevention or delay of cognitive impairment in older adults at risk of developing AD. One of the strengths of this study was the 52-week study duration, which allowed us to examine the long-term impact of the VC Health program. Participants did not experience a statistically significant change in cognitive ability from baseline to week 24, but cognitive function was significantly increased from baseline to week 52. On the basis of RBANS scoring guidelines, participants at baseline had an Average RBANS Total Index score (scores between 90 and 109 are considered to be Average) [36]. By the end of the study, participants experienced an average increase in RBANS Total Index score of 5.8 units, remaining in the Average category. It is possible that the full impact of the VC Health program on cognitive ability may completely manifest in the longer term, over the course of multiple years. Future longitudinal studies should assess whether this increase in cognitive function can be sustained or further improved after 1 year, as well as how cognitive function would be expected to change in the absence of an intervention (in a control group).

    Study participants also experienced statistically and clinically significant improvements in symptoms of depression and anxiety, as measured by PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores. At baseline, participants were considered on average to have Mild Depression and Mild Anxiety based on PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scoring guidelines [22,24]. By the end of the study, their PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores decreased on average by 3.8 and 2.9 points, respectively, moving participants into the Minimal or No Depression and Minimal or No Anxiety categories [22,24]. Participants experienced the largest improvement in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 from baseline to week 24, after which they did not experience any additional statistically significant benefits between week 24 and 52. This suggests that the VC Health program’s impact on mental health is more immediate than its impact on cognitive function. At the beginning of the program, the immediate exposure to psychoeducation, cognitive stimulation, and/or frequent coaching sessions may have had an instant positive impact on a participant’s daily life, resulting in improved mental health. Given that depression and anxiety symptoms are known risk factors for AD, mitigating these symptoms in the first half of the program may play a role in the observed long-term improvements in cognitive function. Future longitudinal studies should be conducted to further understand the longer-term effects of the program on depression and anxiety.

    When we examined various components of program engagement, there was no association between the number of coaching calls a participant completed and change in RBANS Total Index score over time, but there was an association between number of calls completed and improvement in both PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores. Coaching calls are only 1 component of the overall program experience, and different participants may require various levels of attention and frequency of interactions with their coach to gain the same benefit in cognitive function from the program. This finding that more calls completed correlates to mental health improvements further supports the hypothesis that coaching sessions may have a positive impact on an individual’s daily life. Change in depression and anxiety symptoms did not differ by sex, race, or education levels. Given that the sample size of 82 individuals was relatively small for this subgroup analysis, this finding should be further explored in future larger studies.

    The results from this study indicate that participants had overall high satisfaction with the program. The majority of study participants reported the VC Health program improved their diet and eating habits, physical activity, cognitive ability, sleep habits, and stress levels. In addition, despite this being a year-long program, participants were engaged with the VC Health program throughout the study and averaged 16.5 coaching sessions over the 12-month period with an average of 12.9 min per coaching session.

    A number of prospective clinical studies have been previously conducted to measure the impact of digital solutions on chronic disease prevention and management [37-40]; however, there have been a limited number of studies and solutions focused on older adults. In this study, we observed high compliance and engagement with study-related activities (eg, completion of RBANS tests, Web-based assessments) and high engagement and satisfaction with the digital technology–based VC Health program for a population of older at-risk adults with SCD. This suggests that older adults may also enjoy and benefit from new technology-based health solutions, such as the VC Health program, and can successfully participate in remote studies.

    Limitations

    This study had a number of limitations, some of which have been previously discussed in the publication detailing this study’s methods and design [19]. First, given that this was a pre-post study design and there was no control arm, we were unable to compare the changes in cognitive ability and mental health experienced by individuals using the VC Health program with individuals who did not use the program. Therefore, we are unable to fully attribute the observed changes in cognitive ability and mental health to the VC Health program. However, previously conducted observational and longitudinal studies have shown that over a course of a 52-week period, older community-dwelling adults experienced a decline in cognitive ability (as measured by RBANS) over time [32,41]. This suggests that study participants’ cognitive ability may have declined over time in the absence of the VC Health program. Even if participants in the VC Health program just maintained cognitive ability over the course of the 52-week period, this would still be considered a better outcome than what would be seen in the absence of an intervention.

    As a pilot study, the sample size was relatively small, primarily female, white, and well-educated. Although we did stratify results based on sex, race, and education levels in our analyses to explore differences in subgroups, sample sizes for each subpopulation were fairly small; therefore, conclusions based on stratified results are limited.

    Conclusions

    In this pilot study, older adults at risk of developing AD experienced statistically significant improvements in their cognitive function and mental health after participating in the VC Health program. These results serve as initial evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of this fully digital multidomain lifestyle change program (consisting of health coaching, diet, exercise, cognitive training, and social engagement components) to delay or prevent cognitive impairment in older adults at risk for developing AD. This initial evidence can be used to inform future longitudinal randomized controlled studies measuring the impact of the VC Health program on the prevention or delay of cognitive impairment.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank all participants in the VC Health study and all of the study collaborators for their cooperation and hard work. Abigail Levine and Maggie Sandoval provided integral project management and support for this project. Amy Stathakopoulos and her team provided timely and knowledgeable support to study participants as needed throughout their time in the study. Peter Stradinger and his team provided his engineering expertise to help us leverage the Achievement Studies study platform. Hannah Rasmussen helped prepare this manuscript for submission.

    Conflicts of Interest

    Neurotrack makes and owns the VC Health program examined in this study. NB, KC, JMG, and ENM are employed by Neurotrack and receive a salary and stock options. Evidation Health collected and analyzed all study data. SK, JT, HM, CT, and JLJ are employed by Evidation Health and have no financial interest in Neurotrack.

    1. US Census Bureau. Older People Projected to Outnumber Children for First Time in US History   URL: https:/​/web.​archive.org/​web/​20180821001827/​https:/​/www.​census.gov/​newsroom/​press-releases/​2018/​cb18-41-population-projections.​html [accessed 2018-11-01] [WebCite Cache]
    2. World Health Organization and Alzheimer's Disease International. 2012. Dementia: A Public Health Priority   URL: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75263/1/9789241564458_eng.pdf?ua=1 [WebCite Cache]
    3. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, Breteler M, Ceccaldi M, Chételat G, Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) Working Group. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2014 Nov;10(6):844-852 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Jenkins A, Tales A, Tree J, Bayer A. Are we ready? The construct of subjective cognitive impairment and its utilization in clinical practice: a preliminary UK-based service evaluation. J Alzheimers Dis 2015 Sep 24;48(Suppl 1):S25-S31. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Levey A, Lah J, Goldstein F, Steenland K, Bliwise D. Mild cognitive impairment: an opportunity to identify patients at high risk for progression to Alzheimer's disease. Clin Ther 2006 Jul;28(7):991-1001. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Jessen F, Wolfsgruber S, Wiese B, Bickel H, Mösch E, Kaduszkiewicz H, German Study on Aging‚ CognitionDementia in Primary Care Patients. AD dementia risk in late MCI, in early MCI, and in subjective memory impairment. Alzheimers Dement 2014 Jan;10(1):76-83. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Mitchell AJ, Beaumont H, Ferguson D, Yadegarfar M, Stubbs B. Risk of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in older people with subjective memory complaints: meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2014 Dec;130(6):439-451. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Hugo J, Ganguli M. Dementia and cognitive impairment: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin Geriatr Med 2014 Aug;30(3):421-442 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Alzheimer's Association. 2018. 2018 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures   URL: https://www.alz.org/media/HomeOffice/Facts%20and%20Figures/facts-and-figures.pdf [WebCite Cache]
    10. Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Brayne C. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer's disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol 2014 Aug;13(8):788-794. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Meng XF, Yu JT, Wang HF, Tan MS, Wang C, Tan CC, et al. Midlife vascular risk factors and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis 2014;42(4):1295-1310. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Kivipelto M, Mangialasche F, Ngandu T. Lifestyle interventions to prevent cognitive impairment, dementia and Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2018 Nov;14(11):653-666. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Kivipelto M, Solomon A, Ahtiluoto S, Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Antikainen R, et al. The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER): study design and progress. Alzheimers Dement 2013 Nov;9(6):657-665. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levälahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015 Jun 06;385(9984):2255-2263. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Chen C, Xu X, Chew E, Henry C, Koo E. Singapore Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (SINGER) Initiative. 2017 Presented at: Alzheimer's Association International Conference; July 19, 2017; London. [CrossRef]
    16. World Wide Fingers. China-FINGER Project: MIND-CHINA   URL: http://wwfingers.com/mind-china/ [accessed 2018-07-18] [WebCite Cache]
    17. Alzheimer's Assocation. 2017. Announcing US POINTER: A Lifestyle Intervention Trial to Support Brain Health and Prevent Cognitive Decline   URL: https://alz.org/us-pointer/overview.asp [accessed 2018-07-18] [WebCite Cache]
    18. Rosa C, Campbell AN, Miele GM, Brunner M, Winstanley EL. Using e-technologies in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):41-54 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Bott N, Kumar S, Krebs C, Glenn J, Madero E, Juusola J. A Remote Intervention to Prevent or Delay Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Design, Recruitment, and Baseline Characteristics of the Virtual Cognitive Health (VC Health) Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2018 Aug 13;7(8):e11368 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Gifford K, Liu D, Romano R, Jones RN, Jefferson AL. Development of a subjective cognitive decline questionnaire using item response theory: a pilot study. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2015 Dec 01;1(4):429-439 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Jessen F, Wiese B, Bachmann C, Eifflaender-Gorfer S, Haller F, Kölsch H, German Study on Aging‚ CognitionDementia in Primary Care Patients Study Group. Prediction of dementia by subjective memory impairment: effects of severity and temporal association with cognitive impairment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010 Apr;67(4):414-422. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001 Sep;16(9):606-613 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    23. Cameron IM, Crawford JR, Lawton K, Reid IC. Psychometric comparison of PHQ-9 and HADS for measuring depression severity in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2008 Jan;58(546):32-36 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-1097. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Galusha-Glasscock JM, Horton DK, Weiner MF, Cullum CM. Video teleconference administration of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2016 Feb;31(1):8-11 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Wadsworth H, Dhima K, Womack K, Hart J, Weiner MF, Hynan LS, et al. Validity of teleneuropsychological assessment in older patients with cognitive disorders. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2018 Jan 10. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Brearly TW, Shura RD, Martindale SL, Lazowski RA, Luxton DD, Shenal BV, et al. Neuropsychological test administration by videoconference: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rev 2017 Jun;27(2):174-186. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Castanho TC, Sousa N, Santos NC. When new technology is an answer for old problems: the use of videoconferencing in cognitive aging assessment. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2017 May 08;1(1):15-21. [CrossRef]
    29. Shah T, Weinborn M, Verdile G, Sohrabi H, Martins R. Enhancing cognitive functioning in healthly older adults: a systematic review of the clinical significance of commercially available computerized cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline. Neuropsychol Rev 2017 Dec;27(1):62-80. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Rebok GW, Ball K, Guey LT, Jones RN, Kim H, King JW, ACTIVE Study Group. Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014 Jan;62(1):16-24 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Duff K, Patton D, Schoenberg MR, Mold J, Scott JG, Adams RL. Age- and education-corrected independent normative data for the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample. Clin Neuropsychol 2003 Aug;17(3):351-366. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Duff K, Beglinger LJ, Schoenberg MR, Patton DE, Mold J, Scott JG, et al. Test-retest stability and practice effects of the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2005 Jul;27(5):565-575. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Duff K, Humphreys Clark JD, O'Bryant SE, Mold JW, Schiffer RB, Sutker PB. Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer's disease: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2008 Sep;23(5):603-612 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Gimson A, Schlosser M, Huntley J, Marchant N. Support for midlife anxiety diagnosis as an independent risk factor for dementia: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2018 Dec 30;8(4):e019399 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Ownby RL, Crocco E, Acevedo A, John V, Loewenstein D. Depression and risk for Alzheimer disease: systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 May;63(5):530-538 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Randolph C. Pearson Clinical. 2012. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS Update)   URL: https://tinyurl.com/ybgdkef2 [accessed 2018-11-06] [WebCite Cache]
    37. Kumar S, Moseson H, Uppal J, Juusola JL. A diabetes mobile app with in-app coaching from a certified diabetes educator reduces A1C for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2018 Dec;44(3):226-236. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Morawski K, Ghazinouri R, Krumme A, Lauffenburger JC, Lu Z, Durfee E, et al. Association of a smartphone application with medication adherence and blood pressure control: the MedISAFE-BP randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc Intern Med 2018 Jun 01;178(6):802-809. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Sepah S, Jiang L, Peters AL. Long-term outcomes of a Web-based diabetes prevention program: 2-year results of a single-arm longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2015 Apr 10;17(4):e92 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Toro-Ramos T, Kim Y, Wood M, Rajda J, Niejadlik K, Honcz J, et al. Efficacy of a mobile hypertension prevention delivery platform with human coaching. J Hum Hypertens 2017 Dec;31(12):795-800. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Patton DE, Duff K, Schoenberg MR, Mold J, Scott JG, Adams RL. Base rates of longitudinal RBANS discrepancies at one- and two-year intervals in community-dwelling older adults. Clin Neuropsychol 2005 Feb;19(1):27-44. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    AD: Alzheimer disease
    BMI: body mass index
    FINGER: Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability
    GAD-7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 survey
    ITT: intention-to-treat
    IQR: interquartile range
    PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9
    RBANS: Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status
    SCD-9: Subjective Cognitive Decline questionnaire
    VC Health: Virtual Cognitive Health

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 24.08.18; peer-reviewed by J Andrews, A Bahar-Fuchs; comments to author 21.09.18; revised version received 09.10.18; accepted 11.10.18; published 09.11.18

    Copyright

    ©Shefali Kumar, Jennifer LA Tran, Heidi Moseson, Caroline Tai, Jordan M Glenn, Erica N Madero, Caitlyn Krebs, Nicholas Bott, Jessie L Juusola. Originally published in JMIR Aging (http://aging.jmir.org), 09.11.2018.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.